Zhang, Lijun

Abstract Detection of hallmark genomic aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is essential for diagnostic subtyping, prognosis, and patient management. However, cytogenetic/cytogenomic techniques used to identify those aberrations, such as karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), are limited by the need for skilled personnel as well as significant time, cost, and labor. Optical genome mapping (OGM) provides a single, cost-effective assay with a significantly higher resolution than karyotyping and with a comprehensive genome-wide analysis comparable with CMA and the added unique ability to detect balanced structural variants (SVs). Here, we report in a real-world setting the performance of OGM in a cohort of 100 AML cases that were previously characterized by karyotype alone or karyotype and FISH or CMA. OGM identified all clinically relevant SVs and copy number variants (CNVs) reported by these standard cytogenetic methods when representative clones were present in >5% allelic fraction. Importantly, OGM identified clinically relevant information in 13% of cases that had been missed by the routine methods. Three cases reported with normal karyotypes were shown to have cryptic translocations involving gene fusions. In 4% of cases, OGM findings would have altered recommended clinical management, and in an additional 8% of cases, OGM would have rendered the cases potentially eligible for clinical trials. The results from this multi-institutional study indicate that OGM effectively recovers clinically relevant SVs and CNVs found by standard-of-care methods and reveals additional SVs that are not reported. Furthermore, OGM minimizes the need for labor-intensive multiple cytogenetic tests while concomitantly maximizing diagnostic detection through a standardized workflow.

Abstract Glucocorticoid (GC) is an effective anti-myeloma agent by directly inducing apoptosis and growth inhibition in myeloma cells. The anti-myeloma action of GC is mediated by its intracellular receptor, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). The response to GC is variable among myeloma patients and resistance to glucocorticoid treatment develops almost invariably. The mechanism regulating glucocorticoid-sensitivity in not well understood, although it has been hypothesized that the regulation might occur at both the receptor (GR) and post-receptor level. In MM.1 myeloma cell lines, we observed significant down-regulation of GR expression as the cells develop GC-resistance, suggesting that GR expression level is an important determinant of GC-response. Here we present evidence that GR expression level directly correlates with the clinical outcome in myeloma patients who were treated with GC-containing regimens. First, using a quantitative real-time PCR analysis, we performed a retrospective analysis of GR gene expression on bone marrow plasma cell samples from 35 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were then treated on the ECOG study E1A00. This is a phase 3 trial which randomized patients to dexamethasone (dex) alone vs. dex in combination with thalidomide. Pre-treatment expression levels of GR-alpha, GR-beta and GR-P splicing isoforms were measured for 35 patients, of whom, 10 had post-treatment samples available. Interestingly, a large variation of the GR expression levels was observed across the patient samples, with the GR-alpha being the predominant isoform. However, a clear correlation between GR expression and treatment response was not seen, likely due to the small sample size. To access a larger patient pool, we retrospectively analyzed the GR expression levels using the cDNA microarray data from the Arkansas group on 351 newly diagnosed myeloma patients treated with Total Therapy 2, of which dexamethasone was an essential component throughout the treatment course. Of the 351 patients, both event-free (EFS) and overall survivals (OS) were compared between 49 patients (14%) with low levels of GR expression and the rest (86%) with high levels of GR expression. Strikingly, the cases with low levels of GR expression were associated with statistically significantly worse EFS and OS compared to those with high levels of GR expression, with the 5-year EFS of 20% vs. 52% and OS of 34% vs. 68%, P < 0.01. In summary, we have shown for the first time that the baseline level of glucocorticoid receptor expression in newly diagnosed myeloma patients predicts their clinical response to GC-containing regimen and the overall clinical outcome.

Abstract Background: Conventional AlloTx for MM is associated with TRM exceeding 20%. Non-myeloablative AlloTx (NST) utilizes the known graft-vs-myeloma (GVM) effect in an attempt to eradicate minimal residual disease. Preliminary studies of NST in MM demonstrated significant CR and low 100 day post-NST TRM (Badros et al Blood97:2574, 2001). However, even though response rates were high, the vast majority of pts with significant MM disease at the time of transplant, relapsed within the first year. To provide maximal tumor cytoreduction to allow for a subsequent GVM effect, the ECOG designed a Phase II trial of AHSCT for maximal tumor cytoreduction followed by a matched sibling NST to allow for a GVM effect. Methods: The study was designed as a two-stage process based upon early transplant mortality in the first 100 days. Eligibility included pts treated as part of induction therapy or salvage therapy. Chemotherapy responsive disease was not required. Only matched sibling donors were allowed. Pts must have had adequate PS and physiologic organ function. After stem cell mobilization, pts received melphalan 200 mg/m2 with AHSCT. Pts underwent NST 100–182 d post-AHSCT following fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily × 5 and cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 for 2 days. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine and corticosteroids. For pts with acute GVHD, Zenapax 1 mg/kg for 5 doses q 3 d was recommended. GM-CSF was incorporated post-AHSCT and NST. The primary endpoints were day 100 TRM, early graft failure, extent of acute GVHD, toxicities, DFS and OS. The study was suspended for 6 mo after the first 19 pts to evaluate early TRM-no early TRM was observed and the study was re-opened. Results: From 5/3/01 to 1/14/05, 32 pts from 10 institutions were enrolled on the study. 23 patients, median age 51 (range 32–64) completed both transplants (28% drop-out rate): 7 (30%) CR (2 in CCR), 11 (48%) PR and 2 (9%) NR and 3 (13%) NE as the best overall response. Of the 32 pts who completed AHSCT, there were 12 grade 4 toxicities pre-NST; 11/23 pts had grade 4 toxicities post-NST. Acute grade III/IV GVHD was observed in 4 (17%); chronic GVHD was observed in 9 pts (39%): 5 limited; 4 extensive resulting in 3 CR (33%), 1 CCR, and 3 PR (33%). 1 pt (4%) had graft-failure. Two pts (8.7%; 95% CI 1.6%, 24.9%) had TRM prior to day + 100 post-NST. With a median follow up of 3.5 years from registration, the median PFS was 4.4 years and the 2-year survival rate was 78% (95% CI: 61% ∼ 95%) for the 23 pts who completed both transplants. Conclusions: AHSCT followed by NST is feasible in a Cooperative Group setting with a low early TRM. The PFS and OS were superior to historical reports for single and tandem AHSCT. AHSCT-NST tandem transplants resulted in a 78% overall response, including 30% CR (2/7 CCR) - similar to other reports for AHSCT-NST. 3/9 pts with chronic GVHD achieved CR demonstrating the GVM effect. However, a plateau in PFS or OS was not observed indicating that the GVM effect is not sufficient to produce long- term disease control and is unlikely curative using this treatment schema. Future studies should include novel therapies to induce better responses pre-transplant and consideration for post-NST maintenance to further eradicate MRD while allowing for GVM.

Abstract Background: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is at increased risk of thrombotic events, primarily venous thrombosis. The risk is significantly increased in patients receiving certain therapeutic regimens such as the combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone. Deep vein thrombosis, especially if complicated by pulmonary embolism, can result in death. It is not clear if venous thrombotic events can result in compromised survival in this group of patients. Methods: We studied patients enrolled in the Eastern Co-operative Group trial (E1A00) that randomized patients with newly diagnosed myeloma to single agent dexamethasone or thalidomide and dexamethasone. Patients with grade 3 or greater thrombotic events (DVT, or myocardial ischemia, or stroke) were identified. Wilcoxon rank sum test (for continuous variables) or Fisher’s exact test (for categorical variables) was used to compare age, baseline M-protein, hemoglobin, WBC, platelets count, creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, or ECOG PS between patients with and without thrombotic events. Results: Among the 207 patients enrolled, 36 patients (17.4%) had grade 3 or greater thrombotic events with any treatment attribution, of whom, 27 patients had DVT, 3 patients had an MI and 6 pts had a stroke. However, in only 31 of these patients were the event considered treatment-related (possible, probable, or definite) and among these 24 had a DVT. The baseline characteristics did not differ between the patients with thrombosis and those without, irrespective of its relationship to treatment. Similarly, the baseline characteristics did not diff for those with venous or arterial thrombosis. The overall survival was similar among the patients developing a DVT compared to those without a thrombotic event, when all DVT events were considered irrespective of the treatment attribution (Figure). However, majority of the patients with an arterial event (3 patients with MI and 6 with stroke) had a short overall survival. Conclusion: Venous thrombosis remains a common complication in patients with myeloma, especially when treated with thalidomide and dexamethasone. While occurrence of thrombosis clearly contributes to morbidity and often leads to dose reductions and missed doses, it does not appear to have an adverse impact on the overall survival of these patients. Figure Figure

Purpose To determine if maintenance rituximab (MR) after standard chemotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced-stage indolent lymphoma. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III-IV indolent lymphoma with responding or stable disease after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy were stratified by initial tumor burden, residual disease after CVP (minimal or gross), and histology, and randomly assigned to observation (OBS) or MR 375 mg/m2 once per week for 4 weeks every 6 months for 2 years. PFS was the primary end point. Results Three hundred eleven (282 with follicular lymphoma) evaluable patients who received CVP were randomly assigned to OBS (n = 158) or MR (n = 153). Best response improved in 22% MR versus 7% OBS patients (P = .00006). Toxicity was minimal in both study arms. Three-year PFS after random assignment was 68% MR versus 33% OBS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.4; P = 4.4 × 10−10 [all patients]) and 64% MR v 33% OBS (HR = 0.4; P = 9.2 × 10−8 [patients with follicular lymphoma]). There was an advantage for MR regardless of Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score, tumor burden, residual disease, or histology. In multivariate analysis of MR patients, minimal disease after CVP was a favorable prognostic factor. OS at 3 years was 92% MR versus 86% OBS (HR = 0.6; log-rank one-sided P = .05) and, among patients with follicular lymphoma, OS was 91% MR versus 86% (HR = 0.6; log-rank one-sided P = .08). A trend favoring MR was observed among patients with high tumor burden (log-rank one-sided P = .03). Conclusion The E1496 study provides the first phase III data in untreated indolent lymphoma that MR after chemotherapy significantly prolongs PFS.

AbstractThe immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) assay is an invaluable tool for following patients with oligosecretory plasma cell dyscrasia. Baseline values have also been shown to be prognostic in all plasma cell disorders tested. A looming question, however, is the role it should play in following myeloma patients with disease that is measurable using serum and urine electrophoresis. We used the data and stored samples from a mature Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group clinical trial (E9486) to assess serum levels of FLC at baseline and after 2 months of alkylator-based therapy. For serial determinations, the absolute level of involved serum FLC or the difference of the involved and uninvolved FLC is preferred over the ratio of involved to uninvolved FLC. FLC response after 2 months of therapy was superior to early M-protein measurement to predict overall response. The ideal cut-point for FLC change appears to be between 40% and 50% reduction. The correlation between serial measurements of serum FLC and urine M-protein is inadequate to abolish the serial 24-hour urine protein. Although baseline values of FLC are prognostic in newly diagnosed myeloma patients, serial measurements do not appear to have added value in patients who have M-proteins measurable by electrophoresis.