Sable-Hunt, Alicia

Abstract Introduction: The Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) has established a tissue bank for the deposition of bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with multiple myeloma (MM) to be mailed and processed under good laboratory practices (GLP). To date over 300 samples have been collected. The ability for multiple sites to utilize the same GLP protocols for isolation and storage of BM for batch testing can be cost prohibitive and can introduce derived variability. Currently, limited information is available on shipped BM aspirates in regards to cell viability, cell yield, cell purity, and subsequent RNA yield and quality. Materials and methods: To test these determinants we performed a pilot study on behalf of the MMRC where samples were drawn at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR) pooled and split into 2 equal aliquots. One-half of each sample was processed following the provided GLP compliant standard operating procedures (SOP’s), immediately after sample procurement, at MCR. The CD138+ cells were stored in TRIZOLTM and the RNA was isolated and analyzed in a single batch. The other half of the aspirate was sent overnight to Mayo Clinic Scottsdale (MCS) where they were processed using an identical protocol. At both locations samples were tested for the following quality determinants; cell yield, RNA yield and integrity, and viability using a 3 color flow cytometric method (CD45, CD38 and 7ADD). Cell counts were performed on the CD138+ fraction to determine plasma cell recovery and a slide based immunofluorescent assay used to determine purity. RNA recovery and integrity were assessed using the Agilent BioanalyzerTM. Lastly, gene expression profiles was compared to determine the “signature” emanating from the shipment of samples. Results: In aggregate, all quality determinants showed similar values when the two sets of samples were compared. Cell viability was similar in both sets of samples as was our ability to collect a highly enriched plasma cell population. The cell yield was very similar (r2=0.52) but slightly lower in the shipped samples (median 71% of locally processed, range 40–140%), probably due to some shipment-associated apoptosis with subsequent loss of cell surface CD138 antigen. The purity of the shipped samples was very similar to that of locally processed (median 94%). Subjective qualitative analysis of the RNA was similar between both groups (shipped yield being 80% of local) with no evidence of degradation in the shipped samples. Details regarding the shipment signatures using gene expression profiling will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Here we show that the shipment of samples is feasible with no appreciable loss in cell yield or quality of derived products. % APOPTOTIC+ DEAD PC YIELD PURITY (%) RNA Recovered MCR MCS MCR MCS MCR MCS MCR MCS 8.9 ND 15.2 6.8 93 90 11.4 12.8 6.2 ND 2 2.8 95 99 8 17.2 17.4 8 1.4 1.4 75 88 2.2 0 2.1 18.7 2.8 1.6 96 68 7.2 2 18.1 9.5 1.2 .8 100 94 3.4 .4 5 5.0 8.5 7.2 98 91 12.6 17.8 3.7 5.1 .4 .4 88 87 ND ND 19.5 10.3 1.6 1.2 88 79 .4 3.6 29.1 ND 9.2 1.2 100 56 30.2 1.4 5.6 ND 9.2 7.6 92 88 5.2 16.8 20.3 62.8 2.4 .8 84 61 4.6 0.2 4.6 3.7 10.4 2.4 100 94 29.4 8.4 26.5 13.5 5.8 2.8 ND 97 16.8 5.8 4.5 6.2 2.2 2 100 99 10 4.4 17.5 ND 19.2 12 ND ND 16.4 14

Abstract The t[4;14] simultaneously deregulates fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and MMSET in 15% of patients (pts) with Multiple Myeloma (MM). Although oncogenic, FGFR3 expression is lost in ~25% of t[4;14] pts on gene expression profiling while MMSET is always retained. The t[4;14] is highly associated with poor prognosis, furthermore FGFR3 kinase inhibitors are in Phase I trials, thus detection of t[4;14] pts is increasingly important. The Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) therefore evaluated 4 competing methodologies for the diagnostic detection of t[4;14]. Bone marrow (BM) samples were collected in uniform fashion from 85 pts. FGFR3 immunocytochemistry (ICC) and flow cytometry (FC) were performed at the retrieval site, while split samples were shipped to the MMRC tissue bank and processed under GLP conditions. Processed samples were analyzed by cIg-FISH and quantitative IgH-MMSET RT-PCR (QPCR) on unsorted BM and blood. Of 60 samples with sufficient plasma cells for analysis, 8 were FISH +ve [13.3%]. Low % BM plasma cells prevented successful FISH in 25% of samples reflecting large volume harvests and hemodilution. Analysis was conducted in a blinded fashion. With FISH as the gold standard for detection of t[4;14] the sensitivity and specificity of the other diagnostic tests are: BM QPCR is most sensitive (7 of 8 FISH positive detected) and specific (42/43 negatives correctly identified). QPCR on peripheral blood is ongoing. FC is more sensitive to the detection of FGFR3 protein than ICC. Correlation between FC and ICC was only 0.46. Interestingly, 6 of 7 evaluable pts here and 13/14 (92%) in an expanded analysis of FISH +ve patients also expressed the FGFR3 protein. Given the discrepancy between this finding and previously reported loss of FGFR3 expression in 25% of pts we further explored t[4;14] stability. Clonal selection/heterogeneity was determined by the % plasma cells in each pt. with an unbalanced translocation (loss of one der chromosome). In 42 t[4;14] pts, 13 (31%) had a balanced translocation(>75% of cells with a double fusion), 14 (33%) had an unbalanced translocation (>75% cells with only one signal), and 15 (36%) had a chimeric picture. This heterogeneous pattern is suggestive of an evolution towards an unbalanced translocation. Despite this survival did not differ between pts with balanced or unbalanced translocation. Conclusions: These results indicate that the t[4;14] is highly heterogeneous with respect to balanced versus unbalanced translocations, which likely evolve over time. For detection, cIg-FISH continues to be the gold standard diagnostic methodology but may be limited by low plasma cell numbers in dilute BM or during MM remission. QPCR and FC appear most sensitive and specific for presence of t[4;14] and FGFR3 protein expression respectively. Surprisingly (given prior evidence of loss of FGFR3 expression in 25% of pts) 92% of t[4;14] pts in this series expressed FGFR3 protein. # Analyzed % Positive Sensitivity Specificity FISH 60 13 - - QPCR 65 14 87.5 97.6 Flow 82 15 85.7 91 ICC 85 15 62.5 92

Abstract The Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium has established a tissue bank for the deposition of bone marrow samples from patients with multiple myeloma to be mailed and processed under good laboratory practices. To date, over 1,000 samples have been collected. At this time, limited information is available on shipped bone marrow aspirates in regards to cell viability, yield, purity, and subsequent RNA yield and quality. To test these determinants, we did a pilot study on behalf of the Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium where samples were drawn at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR) pooled and split into two equal aliquots. One-half of each sample was processed following good laboratory practices compliant standard operating procedures, immediately after sample procurement, at MCR. The CD138+ cells were stored at -80°C as a Trizol lysate. The other half of the aspirate was sent overnight to Mayo Clinic Scottsdale where they were processed using identical standard operating procedures. The RNA was extracted and analyzed in a single batch at MCR. At both locations, samples were assayed for the following quality determinants: Viability was assessed using a three-color flow cytometric method (CD45, CD38, and 7-AAD). Cell counts were done to determine plasma cell recovery and post-sort purity determined by means of a slide-based immunofluorescent assay. RNA recovery and integrity was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer. Lastly, gene expression profiles were compared to determine the signature emanating from the shipment of samples. Despite minor differences, our results suggest that shipment of samples did not significantly affect these quality determinants in aggregate. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):666–73)