Chen, Yong

11562 Background: High-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) pose a therapeutic challenge due to the high risk of recurrence, even following complete resection. Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking angiogenesis pathways of VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR. Given a promising efficacy for treating patients with unresectable advanced STS in previous trials, we evaluated the role of anlotinib as adjuvant therapy for completely resected high-grade STS. Methods: In a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, eligible patients were those adults who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after complete resection of high-grade STS. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral 12 mg anlotinib or placebo once daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks as a cycle, with up to six cycles until disease recurrence, unmanageable toxicity or death. The primary endpoints included 1-year, 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Between June 2019 and November 2023, 88 patients were randomly assigned to receive anlotinib (n=44) or placebo (n=44). With a median follow-up of 25.99 months at data accrual cutoff on Jan 15, 2024, the 1-year and 2-year DFS rates were 88% and 77% in the anlotinib group, compared to 64% and 58% in the placebo group. Compared to patients in the placebo group, patients in the anlotinib group had a reduced risk of disease recurrence (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.22~1.00, P= 0.0445]). The median DFS was not reached. Based on tumor histology, the greatest improvement in DFS with anlotinib versus placebo was observed in patients with myxofibrosarcoma (1-year DFS rate: 82% versus 61%; 2-year DFS rate: 64% versus 43%, HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.17~1.65], P= 0.2698) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (1-year DFS rate: 86% versus 67%; 2-year DFS rate: 78% versus 67%, HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.12~2.87], P= 0.4971). Thirty-eight patients experienced adverse events (AEs; 34 with grade 1~2, 4 with grade 3): 28 patients (64%) in the anlotinib group versus 10 patients (23%) in the placebo group ( P<0.001). Three patients discontinued anlotinib, including two for proteinuria/hematuresis (2/44, 5%) and one for secondary poor surgical wound healing (1/44, 2%). Conclusions: Current results suggest anlotinib could lower disease recurrence risk in patients with completely resected high-grade STS, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03951571 . [Table: see text]

Background. Acral melanoma (AM) is a rare subtype of melanoma, which is one of the least common in Caucasian patients but is a common subtype of melanoma in Chinese patients. It is unclear if prognosis differs between Chinese and Caucasian patients diagnosed with AM. The aim of our study is to investigate patient characteristics and survival differences between Chinese and Caucasian AM patients. Methods. Two large institutional melanoma databases from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and Mayo Clinic enterprise were retrospectively reviewed from 2009 to 2015. Clinicopathologic and survival data were collected and analyzed between the two groups. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) and was calculated using the Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Results. The Chinese group presented with more advanced disease compared with Caucasians: thicker Breslow depth (median 3.0 mm vs. 1.2 mm, p = 0.003 ), more ulcerated disease (66.1% vs. 29%; p < 0.001 ), and advanced stages (stage II/III 84.3% vs. 37.1%; p < 0.001 ). No significant difference was identified in terms of age at diagnosis, location, histologic subtypes, or node positive rate. The 5-year DSS rate was 68.4% and 73% ( p = 0.56 ) in Chinese and Caucasians AM patients, respectively. Male gender, Breslow thickness, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes were independent poor prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. Conclusions. There appears to be no difference in stage-stratified survival between Chinese and Caucasians, supporting the implementation of clinical trials for AM that could include both Chinese and Caucasian patients.

Abstract Background Acral melanoma is the most common subtype of melanoma in Chinese patients and one of the least common in Caucasian patients. It has been unclear if outcomes differ between Chinese and Caucasian patients diagnosed with Acral Melanoma. This study investigated patient characteristics and survival differences between Chinese and Caucasian Acral Melanoma patients. Methods Two large institutional melanoma databases from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and Mayo Clinic enterprise, were retrospectively reviewed from 2009 to 2015. Clinicopathologic and survival data were collected and analyzed between the two groups. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) and was calculated using the Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Results The Chinese group presented with more advanced disease compared with Caucasians: thicker Breslow depth (median 3.0 mm vs. 1.2 mm, p=0.003), more ulcerated disease (66.1% vs 29%; p<0.001), and advanced stages (stage II/III 84.3% vs. 37.1%; p<0.001). No significant difference was identified in terms of age at diagnosis, location, histologic subtypes, or node positive rate. The 5-year DSS rate was 68.4% and 73% (p=0.56) for Chinese and Caucasians, respectively. Male gender, Breslow thickness, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes predicted worse DSS on multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusions There appears to be no difference in stage-stratified survival between Chinese and Caucasians, supporting the implementation of clinical trials of AM that could include both Chinese and Caucasian patients.