Piguet, Vincent

ABSTRACT Background Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis highly associated with systemic comorbidities. Accurate diagnosis and treatment remain challenging due to its rarity and clinical mimickers. Objectives To evaluate demographic, clinical features and treatment outcomes in patients referred with suspected PG at a tertiary wound care centre. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted of patients referred for suspected PG between April 2021 and June 2023. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, including biopsies and tissue cultures, were collected. Patients were categorised as having PG vs alternative diagnoses based on diagnostic criteria from Su, Maverakis and the PARACELSUS score. Results Of 60 patients (female, 51.7%; mean [SD] age 52.9 [14.0] years), 44 (73.3%) met at least one published diagnostic criterion for PG. The most common comorbidity was IBD (63.6%), followed by inflammatory arthritis (25.0%) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (4.5%). Systemic corticosteroids were used by 40.9% of patients before referral, but steroid‐sparing agents and biologics were the primary treatments after consultation. Biologics and steroid‐sparing agents were associated with significant improvement in disease activity using the PGA score (average score decreased from 2.3 to 1.5, p < 0.005), with 40.9% achieving complete remission. Elevated serum inflammatory markers and faecal calprotectin were observed in PG patients but absent in non‐PG cases. Conclusions These prospective data support previously published rates of association between PG and systemic comorbidities. Steroid‐sparing anti‐neutrophilic and targeted therapies are effective steroid‐sparing strategies in managing PG. Small sample size and referral bias may limit generalisability.

AbstractAn increasing amount of evidence has emerged suggesting that hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with inflammatory arthritis. This study reviewed the incidence, prevalence, and predictors of inflammatory arthritis in patients with HS. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, and Medline from inception to February 14, 2020. Articles were included in the review if they provided data on disease epidemiology or predictors of adult or pediatric HS patients with comorbid inflammatory arthritis. There are no validated diagnostic criteria for HS, thus we considered patients as having HS if they had at least one diagnostic code in a hospital or claims database or a diagnosis of HS/inflammatory arthritis in a medical record. The same criteria were used to confirm presence of inflammatory arthritis. We identified an increased incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in HS patients when compared with estimates in the general population. We identified a relatively high prevalence of RA, spondyloarthritis (SpA), and PsA in HS patients when compared with estimates in the general population. There was evidence to suggest that patients who are younger than 30, male, have severe HS, or are taking infliximab or adalimumab (which may also be confounded by HS disease severity) may be at greater risk for specific subtypes of inflammatory arthritis. However, further data are needed to confirm these associations. The increased incidence and prevalence of inflammatory arthritis within HS patients underscore the need for increased awareness and interdisciplinary partnership within rheumatology and dermatology.

AbstractThere is a lack of validated tools to measure fatigue in patients with inflammatory skin, neuropsychiatric, and medical disorders. The use of nonvalidated tools may compromise the quality of data. The purpose of this meta‐review was to evaluate existing fatigue scales commonly used to assess fatigue in other inflammatory conditions and to identify if there are scales that have been validated in dermatologic conditions. The PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched from inception through March 10, 2020, in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Validated tools were identified and assessed according to their main measurement properties. The literature search identified 403 references, and eight studies were eligible and assessed in this review. The unidimensional fatigue scales included were the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue (FACIT‐F), Brief Fatigue Inventory, Fatigue Severity Scale, Numerical Rating Scale – Fatigue, and Visual Analog Scale – Fatigue. The multidimensional fatigue scales found were the Checklist Individual Strength, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory Scale, and Piper Fatigue Scale. To measure fatigue, a brief scale with the ability to detect change is needed as there is a growing interest in evaluating this dimension of treatment response. In addition, a good content validity is also needed. From this systematic review, none of the selected scales have had content validation, even though the FACIT was validated in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Validation studies in specific disorders are urgently warranted.