Back to Authors

Walter, Louise C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-6238

Mayo Clinic

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Citations 3

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 1.2021
Walter, Louise C. , Browner, Ilene , Clifton, Katherine , Cohen, Harvey Jay, Extermann, Martine , Gross, Cary P. , Gupta, Sumati , Hollis, Genevieve, Keating, Nancy L. , Koll, Thuy T., McKoy, June M. , Misra, Sumi, Moon, Dominic H. , Owusu, Cynthia , Rosko, Ashley , Russell, Marcia M. , Sedrak, Mina S. , Siddiqui, Fareeha, Stella, Amy, Stirewalt, Derek L. , Tew, William P. , Hollinger, Liz, George, Giby V. , Sundar, Hema, Dotan, Efrat , Clifton, Katherine , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Jagsi, Reshma , Kessler, Elizabeth , Korc‐Grodzicki, Beatriz , O’Connor, Tracey L. , Sedrak, Mina S. , Subbiah, Ishwaria M. , Williams, Grant R.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 22, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1006-1019

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0043 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Older Adult Oncology address specific issues related to the management of cancer in older adults, including screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), assessing the risks and benefits of treatment, preventing or decreasing complications from therapy, and managing patients deemed to be at high risk for treatment-related toxicity. CGA is a multidisciplinary, in-depth evaluation that assesses the objective health of the older adult while evaluating multiple domains, which may affect cancer prognosis and treatment choices. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines providing specific practical framework for the use of CGA when evaluating older adults with cancer.
Expanding Beyond Maximum Grade: Chemotherapy Toxicity over Time by Age and Performance Status in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in CALGB 9730 (Alliance A151729)
Wong, Melisa L. , Gao, Junheng , Thanarajasingam, Gita , Sloan, Jeff A. , Dueck, Amylou C. , Novotny, Paul J. , Jatoi, Aminah , Hurria, Arti , Walter, Louise C. , Cohen, Harvey Jay, Wood, William A. , Feliciano, Josephine , Stinchcombe, Thomas E. , Wang, Xiaofei , Dueck, A. C. , Wood, William A , Miaskowski, Christine

The Oncologist | September 20, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e435-e444

10.1002/onco.13527 Get It

Abstract Background Prior comparisons of chemotherapy adverse events (AEs) by age and performance status (PS) are limited by the traditional maximum grade approach, which ignores low-grade AEs and longitudinal changes. Materials and Methods To compare fatigue and neuropathy longitudinally by age (<65, ≥65 years) and PS (0–1, 2), we analyzed data from a large phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (CALGB 9730, n = 529). We performed multivariable (a) linear mixed models to estimate mean AE grade over time, (b) linear regression to estimate area under the curve (AUC), and (c) proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratio of developing grade ≥2 AE, as well as traditional maximum grade analyses. Results Older patients had on average a 0.17-point (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00–0.34; p = .049) higher mean fatigue grade longitudinally compared with younger patients. PS 2 was associated with earlier development of grade ≥2 fatigue (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07–2.27; p = .02). For neuropathy, older age was associated with earlier development of grade ≥2 neuropathy (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.00–1.97; p = .049). Patients with PS 2 had a 1.30 point lower neuropathy AUC (95% CI, −2.36 to −0.25; p = .02) compared with PS 0–1. In contrast, maximum grade analyses only detected a higher percentage of older adults with grade ≥3 fatigue and neuropathy at some point during treatment. Conclusion Our comparison of complementary but distinct aspects of chemotherapy toxicity identified important longitudinal differences in fatigue and neuropathy by age and PS that are missed by the traditional maximum grade approach. Clinical trial identification number: NCT00003117 (CALGB 9730) Implications for Practice The traditional maximum grade approach ignores persistent low-grade adverse events (AEs) and changes over time. This toxicity over time analysis of fatigue and neuropathy during chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer demonstrates how to use longitudinal methods to comprehensively characterize AEs over time by age and performance status (PS). We identified important longitudinal differences in fatigue and neuropathy that are missed by the maximum grade approach. This new information about how older adults and patients with PS 2 experience these toxicities longitudinally may be used clinically to improve discussions about treatment options and what to expect to inform shared decision making and symptom management.