Back to Authors

Powell, Charles R.

Mayo Clinic

Indiana University School of Medicine

Citations 3

Executive Summary: The AUA/SUFU/AUGS Guideline on Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
Kaufman, Melissa R. , Ackerman, A. Lenore, Amin, Katherine , Coffey, Marge, Danan, Elisheva R. , Hardart, Anne , Ippolito, Giulia M., Northington, Gina M. , Powell, Charles R., Rubin, Rachel , Westney, O. Lenaine , Wilson, Tracey , Lane, Giulia I. , Ackerman, A. Lenore, Coffey, Marge, Faubion, Stephanie S. , Goldstein, Irwin , Ippolito, Giulia M., Lee, Una J

Urogynecology | September 30, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1005-1014

10.1097/spv.0000000000001753 Get It

Purpose Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) describes the symptoms and physical changes that result from declining estrogen and androgen concentrations in the genitourinary tract during the menopausal transition. This guideline provides information to clinicians regarding identification, diagnosis, counseling, and treatment for patients with GSM to optimize symptom control and quality of life while minimizing adverse events. Methods The systematic review used in the creation of this guideline is based on research conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The EPC synthesized effectiveness and/or harms outcomes from 68 publications. An additional 66 articles evaluating 46 nonhormonal interventions were described in an evidence map. Results Clinicians diagnose GSM based on symptoms, with or without related physical findings, and after ruling out other etiologies or co-occurring pathologies. There is a large body of evidence examining the use of hormonal and nonhormonal treatment options to manage the symptoms of GSM; however, the local low-dose vaginal estrogen has the most robust evidence base. Conclusion The strategies defined in this document were derived from evidence-based and consensus-based processes. Given that there is insufficient information to recommend one hormonal therapy over another, this guideline is not meant to support a stepwise progression through different hormonal approaches. The clinician should make treatment decisions in the context of shared decision-making, considering patient goals and preferences, using the evidence of efficacy and adverse events of each possible intervention as a guide.
Treatment of urethral stricture disease in women: A multi‐institutional collaborative project from the SUFU research network
Lane, Giulia I. , Smith, Ariana L. , Stambakio, Hanna, Lin, George, Alawamlh, Omar Al Hussein, Anger, Jennifer T. , Brandes, Eileen R., Carmel, Maude , Chung, Doreen E. , Cox, Lindsey , DeLong, Jessica , Eltahawy, Ehab , França, Wagner, Gousse, Angelo E., Gupta, Priyanka , Hagedorn, Judith C. , High, Rachel , Khan, Aqsa , Kowalik, Casey G. , Lee, Richard K., Lucioni, Alvaro , MacDonald, Susan M. , Malaeb, Bahaa S., McKay, Scotty, Padmanabhan, Priya , Powell, Charles R., Sajadi, Kamran P. , Sutherland, Suzette E. , Theva, Didi , Vollstedt, Annah , Welk, Blayne , Zheng, Yu , Cameron, Anne P. , Carmel, Maude E , Elliott, Christopher S , Sajadi, Kamran P , Vollstedt, Annah , Welk, Blayne , Lee, Una J

Neurourology and Urodynamics | September 19, 2020 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2433-2441

10.1002/nau.24507 Get It

Abstract Aim Female urethral stricture disease is rare and has several surgical approaches including endoscopic dilations (ENDO), urethroplasty with local vaginal tissue flap (ULT) or urethroplasty with free graft (UFG). This study aims to describe the contemporary management of female urethral stricture disease and to evaluate the outcomes of these three surgical approaches. Methods This is a multi‐institutional, retrospective cohort study evaluating operative treatment for female urethral stricture. Surgeries were grouped into three categories: ENDO, ULT, and UFG. Time from surgery to stricture recurrence by surgery type was analyzed using a Kaplan–Meier time to event analysis. To adjust for confounders, a Cox proportional hazard model was fit for time to stricture recurrence. Results Two‐hundred and ten patients met the inclusion criteria across 23 sites. Overall, 64% ( n = 115/180) of women remained recurrence free at median follow‐up of 14.6 months (IQR, 3–37). In unadjusted analysis, recurrence‐free rates differed between surgery categories with 68% ENDO, 77% UFG and 83% ULT patients being recurrence free at 12 months. In the Cox model, recurrence rates also differed between surgery categories; women undergoing ULT and UFG having had 66% and 49% less risk of recurrence, respectively, compared to those undergoing ENDO. When comparing ULT to UFG directly, there was no significant difference of recurrence. Conclusion This retrospective multi‐institutional study of female urethral stricture demonstrates that patients undergoing endoscopic management have a higher risk of recurrence compared to those undergoing either urethroplasty with local flap or free graft.