Wigle, Dennis A.

e18538 Background: The drug-induced apoptosis MiCK assay has been predictive of outcomes in acute myelocytic leukemia, ovarian cancer, and a variety of solid tumors including breast cancer (Cancer Research 2012; 72:3901). We compared MiCK assay results in mesothelioma patients (pts) with NSCLC pts. Methods: Specimens from tissue or effusions were submitted to a central lab, processed to purify neoplastic cells, and a MiCK assay was performed as described (Cancer 2012; 118: 4877). Best chemotherapy regimens are defined as drugs/combinations with highest kinetic units (KU) of apoptosis +/- 1 SD compared to other drugs (this definition was predictive of outcomes in ovarian cancer). Active drugs have results over 1.0 KU of apoptosis. Results: 10 specimens have been submitted and 7 have been successful. Mean age was 69 and mean number of prior lines of therapy were 0.7 in 3 mesothelioma pts and 2.0 in 4 NSCLC pts. Mean number of drugs or combinations assayed successfully were 41 in mesothelioma and 20 in NSCLC. In mesothelioma, best active chemotherapy regimens (>1.0 KU) have been pemetrexed+doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and dactinomycin. In NSCLC, best active regimens have been doxorubicin+cisplatin, irinotecan, and cyclophosphamide+doxorubicin+vincristine. In mesothelioma pts, the assay has been able to identify unexpected significant activity of several drugs: epirubicin, idarubicin, daunorubicin, dactinomycin, bendamustine, melphalan, vincristine, topotecan, azacytidine and bortezomib. Conclusions: Use of the MiCK assay in mesothelioma is at least as successful in the laboratory as it is in NSCLC. Unexpected new leads for innovative therapeutic strategies have been identified by the in vitro results. This feasibility study justifies a prospective controlled trial of the MiCK assay in mesothelioma and NSCLC pts. Clinical trials of drugs with unexpected activity are warranted in mesothelioma pts. Clinical trial information: NCT 01770665.

7568 Background: The molecular events in the initiation and progression of invasive lung adenocarcinoma remain poorly characterized. These tumors are thought to develop through an adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), invasive adenocarcinoma (AD) sequence. The goal of our study was to assess lineage relationships between in situ and invasive components within adenocarcinomas with prominent lepidic growth patterns. Methods: Frozen tissue from fourteen lung adenocarcinomas with mixtures of AD together with an adjacent in situ component (AIS), varying in ratio between 40 to 80%, were selected from our Lung Specimen Registry. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) of each component was performed separately for each tumor. Genomic DNA was isolated using a direct in situ whole genome amplification (WGA) methodology, and Next Generation Sequencing performed using an Illumina Mate Pair (MP) library protocol. MP sequence reads were mapped to the human genome and primers spanning the fusion junctions were used in validation PCRs. Results: Genomic break points identical and unique to a specific patient were identified between the AIS and AD components in 13 (of 14) cases. The total number of events per case ranged from 4-215, and the number of identical events shared between the AIS and AD components ranged from 30 to 90%. Recurrent genomic breakpoints between cases were also observed, with the 2 most common involving 8q24.3 in 5 cases and FAM19A2 on chromosome 12 in 4 cases. PCR validation of selected genomic alterations confirmed the genomic break points identified from sequencing in both the AIS and AD in all cases. Interestingly, we also observed a limited number of genomic alterations present in a zonal distribution of surrounding normal lung around the tumor mass. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates unique chromosomal alterations present in both the AIS and AD components of individual lung tumors with features of lepidic growth. These data provide evidence for lineage relationship and clonal relatedness between the two components, and provide genomic evidence for a model of stepwise progression from AIS to invasive AD in this subset of lung adenocarcinomas.

4026 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma commonly receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Despite this approach the rate of recurrence remains high. Given the difficulties of postoperative therapy, the efficacy of extended neoadjuvant therapy was assessed. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-4,N0 – Tany,N(+) disease amenable to radiation and surgery. Pts were randomized to either arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 , oxaliplatin [Oxal] 85 mg/m2 day 1, and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 x 2 cycles [DOC] followed by 5-FU 180 mg/m2/day continuous IV through radiation + Oxal 85 mg/m2 days 1,15,29 + 50.4 Gy radiation (chemo-RT)) or arm B (chemo-RT alone). Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and stage (II vs III/IVA). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (PCR) rate, defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified in the surgical specimen. Interim analysis assessed efficacy and futility of the experimental intervention. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare clinical/pathologic factors between arms. Results: Baseline and stratification factors were well balanced between arms. Of 42 pts included in the interim analysis (86% male; age [median 63, range 38-88], 100% PS 0/1; 71% stage III; 55% esophagus, 40% GEJ; 36% measurable disease), 4 and 1 pts in arms A and B, respectively, did not have surgery due to death (A, 2), progressive disease (A, 1), alternative treatment (A, 1) or adverse event (B, 1). Among 21 arm A pts, 21, 20, and 19 pts started 1st cycle of DOC, 2nd cycle of DOC and chemo-RT, respectively. All arm B pts received chemo-RT. 33% (7/21) of arm A and 48% (10/21) of arm B pts achieved PCR (p=0.53). Among pts undergoing surgery, 94% (16/17) and 100% (20/20) of arm A and B pts had complete resection (p=0.46). 38% and 24% of arm A and B pts experienced at least one grade 4+ adverse event at least possibly related to treatment (p=0.51). Conclusions: Extended neoadjuvant therapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma failed to improve the PCR rate. Follow-up in regard to survival and rate of recurrence is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00938470.

2038 The effects of combining histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors were evaluated in both established glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines and short-term cultures derived from the Mayo Clinic xenograft GBM panel. Co-exposure of LBH589 (LBH) and botezomib (btzmb) results in a striking induction of apoptosis, at minimally toxic doses of either drug alone, in established U251, U87, and D37 GBM cell lines, as well as in GBM8 (G-8), GBM10 (G-10), GBM12 (G-12), GBM14 (G-14), and GBM56 (G-56) cells, which have been developed from the Mayo xenograft GBM panel and maintained in short-term cultures. Synergism of apoptosis induction was also observed in U251 cells when co-exposing other HDAC inhibitors, including LAQ824 (LAQ) and trichostatin A (TSA), with another proteasome inhibitor MG132, demonstarting a class effect. In U251 cells, btzmb alone or in combination with LBH decreased Raf-1 levels and inactivated Akt and Erk. Either LBH589 or bortezomib alone increased expression of the cell cycle regulators p21 and p27. Additionally, the combination, but not the individual agents, markedly increased JNK activation. In addition, cell death after exposure to LBH589 and bortezomib is associated with cytochrome c release, Bax translocation, as well as caspase and PARP cleavage. Bax translocation may contribute to the synergistic cytotoxicity of the combination of LBH and btzmb in glioma cells since Bax translocation to mitochondria is known to precede cytochrome c release and apoptosis, but other pathways are likely to be involved. This combination regimen warrants further preclinical and possible clinical study for glioma patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Background: Adenocarcinoma of the lung is the most common type of non-small cell lung cancer and is the subtype found in approximately 50% of all lung cancer cases. Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) are thought to be precursor lesions of invasive disease. It has been hypothesized that there is a step-wise progression to lung adenocarcinoma, but little is known about genomic alterations in these precursor lesions. Methods: Genomic analysis including whole genome and exome sequencing, and SNP array analysis were performed on 9 AIS and 18 MIA pathologically confirmed samples to identify single nucleotide variants (SNVs), structural variations and copy number variations. Mutation significance and signature analysis were determined by MutSig and NMF analyses. Altered pathways were determined by Ingenuity variant effect pathway analysis. Results: The tumor mutation burden (TMB) for AIS and MIA ranged from 0.8 to 23.1 mut/Mb with a median of 3.0mut/Mb and a mean of 5.1mut/Mb. Highly mutated genes identified in AIS and MIA were RPL10, NBPF1, KRAS, GPR52, CAMK2A, ATOX1, STK11, TP53, MET and EGFR. Genes with recurrent mutations included SPTA1, USH2A, CACNA1E, EGFR, KRAS, MUC16, MUC17, OTOG, RYR2, COL20A1, CSMD3, RFX6 and XIRP2, which implicated pathways involving the EGFR-KRAS-TP53-MAPK axis. Somatic mutations were characterized by a C>T, T>C transitions and C>A transversion signature. There were comparable structural variations in the AIS cases compared to MIA. Conclusion: In contrast to hypothesized models of tumor progression, AIS and MIA can harbor significant genomic alterations and tumor mutation burden, which suggests an intriguing concept of immunotherapeutic options for either treatment or chemoprevention. Deregulation of EGFR-KRAS-TP53-MAPK pathway indicates a role in early events of carcinogenesis. Citation Format: Michael K. Asiedu, Nanette R. Reed, Marie Christine Aubry, Anja C. Roden, Dennis A. Wigle. Genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma precursor lesions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 728.