AbstractBackgroundThere are few treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM).MethodsWe report a case series of patients with breast cancer and LM treated with intra‐CSF topotecan (TOPO). Outcome was assessed by clinical exam and MRI at baseline, at end of induction (4‐5 weeks), then every 3 months; CSF cytology was determined at baseline and with each treatment.ResultsThirty‐one women [median age, 58 (37‐81); median KPS 60 (40‐100)] received treatment. At baseline, 68% had positive CSF cytology, and 90%, leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI. 84% of patients also received focal RT (not during TOPO) and 77% received concomitant systemic hormonal or chemotherapy. Median number of TOPO treatments was 14.5 (range, 3‐71); median duration of treatment, 11 weeks (1‐176); and median OS, 6.9 months (range, 0.9‐48.8). Patients remaining progression‐free during 4‐6 weeks of induction (81%) had a median OS of 11.5 months (range, 1.8‐48.8). Overall neurologic PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 39%, 26%, and 6%, respectively. Clearing of CSF malignant cells for >3 consecutive samples occurred in 10/21 (48%) patients with positive CSF cytology at baseline, remaining clear for a median duration of 15.9 months (range, 1.4‐34.5). Grade 3 adverse events included headache or vomiting (3pts), T2 hyperintensity surrounding the ventricular catheter (2 pts), and meningitis (2 pts).ConclusionsIntra‐CSF TOPO, with focal RT as needed for symptomatic areas of enhancement produced durable clearing of CSF malignant cells in 48% of patients positive at baseline, with promising median PFS and OS.
Seizures in patients with glioma treated with phenytoin and levetiracetam
e13020 Background: Seizures are common in patients with glioma. Phenytoin, traditionally used for these patients, can be associated with intolerable side effects and potentially alters the metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents. Levetiracetam has more favorable pharmacokinetics facilitating ease of use with fewer side effects and is nonenzyme inducing. We compare seizure outcomes and side effects in patients with glioma treated with phenytoin and levetiracetam monotherapy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with glioma. Subjects had at least one clinical seizure and had to be followed for 6 months. Seizure outcomes and side effects were compared between cohorts treated with phenytoin or levetiracetam. Seizure outcomes were measured by time to second seizure and seizure frequency. Results: 76 patients (34 female) with pathologically proven glioma and seizures were identified, 25 treated with phenytoin and 51 with levetiracetam. 64% had grade 4 astrocytoma. There was no difference in seizure outcome between the phenytoin and levetiracetam groups when comparing time to second seizure (p = 0.584), second seizure rates (p = 0.462), and average seizures per month (p = 0.776). When adjusting for age, gender, type of seizure, type of glioma, and dosage using univariate and multivariate models there were no differences between the treatment groups and none of these covariates were statistically significant for explaining the second seizure rates between treatment groups (all p values >0.05). The incidence of side effects in the levetiracetam group was 5.9% versus 20% in the phenytoin group (p = 0.106). Additionally, 36.0% of the patients in the phenytoin group had dose adjustments not related to breakthrough seizures compared to only 9.8% in the levetiracetam group (p = 0.010). Conclusions: In this study, glioma patients treated with levetiracetam had similar seizure control as patients treated with phenytoin. Patients treated with levetiracetam experienced fewer side effects and required fewer non seizure related dose adjustments than patients treated with phenytoin. Levetiracetam is a safe, effective, and preferred alternative for seizure management in patients with glioma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.