Back to Authors

Followill, D

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6744-0439

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 2

AAPM Task Group Report 306: Quality control and assurance for tomotherapy: An update to Task Group Report 148
Chen, Quan , Burmeister, Jay , Chao, Edward, Corradini, Nathan, Followill, D , Liu, An , Qi, X. Sharon , Shi, Hai-Rong, Smilowitz, Jennifer B., Rong, Yi , Li, X. Allen , Shi, Hairong, Smilowitz, Jennifer B.

Medical Physics | December 13, 2022 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/mp.16150 Get It

AbstractSince the publication of AAPM Task Group (TG) 148 on quality assurance (QA) for helical tomotherapy, there have been many new developments on the tomotherapy platform involving treatment delivery, on‐board imaging options, motion management, and treatment planning systems (TPSs). In response to a need for guidance on quality control (QC) and QA for these technologies, the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee commissioned TG 306 to review these changes and make recommendations related to these technology updates. The specific objectives of this TG were (1) to update, as needed, recommendations on tolerance limits, frequencies and QC/QA testing methodology in TG 148, (2) address the commissioning and necessary QA checks, as a supplement to Medical Physics Practice Guidelines (MPPG) with respect to tomotherapy TPS and (3) to provide risk‐based recommendations on the new technology implemented clinically and treatment delivery workflow. Detailed recommendations on QA tests and their tolerance levels are provided for dynamic jaws, binary multileaf collimators, and Synchrony motion management. A subset of TPS commissioning and QA checks in MPPG 5.a. applicable to tomotherapy are recommended. In addition, failure mode and effects analysis has been conducted among TG members to obtain multi‐institutional analysis on tomotherapy‐related failure modes and their effect ranking.
Practice patterns and recommendations for pediatric image‐guided radiotherapy: A Children's Oncology Group report
Hua, Chia‐Ho , Vern-Gross, T.Z., Olch, Arthur J. , Alaei, Parham , Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam, Ulin, Kenneth, Laurie, Fran, Gopalakrishnan, Mahesh , Krasin, Matthew J. , Merchant, Thomas E. , Donaldson, Sarah S. , FitzGerald, Thomas J. , Haas‐Kogan, Daphne A. , Mahajan, Anita , Marcus, Karen J. , Taylor, Paige A. , Ahern, Verity , Followill, D , Breneman, John C. , Kalapurakal, John A. , Hodgson, David , Vern-Gross, Tamara Z, Wolden, Suzanne , Merchant, Thomas E , Donaldson, Sarah S , FitzGerald, Thomas J , Hodgson, David C , Laack, Nadia N Issa , Krasin, Matthew J , Taylor, Paige , Hodgson, David , Hess, Clayton Burnett , Deng, Jun , Gopalakrishnan, Mahesh, Esiashvili, Natia , Wolden, Suzanne L. , Constine, Louis S , Laack, Nadia N. , Buchsbaum, Jeffrey Craig

Pediatric Blood & Cancer | August 10, 2020 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pbc.28629 Get It

AbstractThis report by the Radiation Oncology Discipline of Children's Oncology Group (COG) describes the practice patterns of pediatric image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) based on a member survey and provides practice recommendations accordingly. The survey comprised of 11 vignettes asking clinicians about their recommended treatment modalities, IGRT preferences, and frequency of in‐room verification. Technical questions asked physicists about imaging protocols, dose reduction, setup correction, and adaptive therapy. In this report, the COG Radiation Oncology Discipline provides an IGRT modality/frequency decision tree and the expert guidelines for the practice of ionizing image guidance in pediatric radiotherapy patients.