Yokokawa, Miki

AbstractIntroductionVentricular tachycardia (VT) in structurally normal hearts or nonischemic cardiomyopathy can originate from the aortic sinuses of Valsalva (SoV). It is unknown whether VT can originate from the SoVs in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence, arrhythmogenic substrate, and ablation outcomes of postinfarction VT originating from the SoVs.MethodsAmong 217 consecutive patients with postinfarction VT undergoing ablation, we identified 13 (6%) patients who had ≥1 VT mapped in a SoV. Control groups of 13 patients with idiopathic SoV VT and 13 postinfarction patients without SoV VT were included.ResultsIn the study group, 17 VTs were mapped in a SoV (right n = 5, left‐right commissure n = 6, left n = 6). SoV VT target sites had low bipolar voltage during sinus rhythm [median 0.42 (IQR: 0.16–0.53) mV] which was significantly lower than target sites in patients with idiopathic SoV VTs [median 1.02 (IQR: 0.89–1.52) mV; p < .001]. An area of endocardial low voltage was found below the aortic valve in all patients with postinfarction SoV VTs compared to 9 (69%) of the patients in the postinfarction control group without SoV VT (p = .02). Morphology characteristics of postinfarction SoV VTs differed from idiopathic SoV VTs. None of the postinfarction SoV VTs were inducible after ablation and none recurred after a median follow‐up of 14 months.ConclusionIn patients with prior MI, VT can be targeted in an aortic SoV. The SoVs should be routinely investigated in postinfarction patients with inferior axis VT and an area of low voltage below the aortic valve.

Abstract Aims Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, some patients may experience a worsened arrhythmia phenotype after ablation. We aimed to determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of arrhythmia exacerbation (AE) after post-infarction VT ablation. Methods and results A total of 1187 consecutive patients (93% men, median age 68 years, median ejection fraction 30%) who underwent post-infarction VT ablation at six centres were included. Arrhythmia exacerbation was defined as post-ablation VT storm or incessant VT in patients without prior similar events. During follow-up (median 717 days), 426 (36%) patients experienced VT recurrence. Events qualifying as AE occurred in 67 patients (6%). Median times to VT recurrence with and without AE were 238 [interquartile range (IQR) 35–640] days and 135 (IQR 22–521) days, respectively (P = 0.25). Almost half of the patients (46%) who experienced AE experienced it within 6 months of the index procedure. Patients with AE had had longer ablation times during the ablation procedures compared to the rest of the patients (median 42 vs. 34 min, P = 0.02). Among patients with VT recurrence, the risk of death or heart transplantation was significantly higher in patients with than without AE (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.28–3.10; P = 0.002) after adjusting for age, gender, ejection fraction, cardiac resynchronization therapy, post-ablation non-inducibility, and post-ablation amiodarone use. Conclusion Arrhythmia exacerbation after ablation of infarct-related VT is infrequent but is independently associated with an adverse long-term outcome among patients who experience a VT recurrence. The mechanisms and mitigation strategies of AE after catheter ablation require further investigation.