Wilson, John

Introduction: Periaortitis is a rare inflammatory condition with both infectious and non-infectious aetiologies, often presenting a diagnostic challenge. A comprehensive evaluation—including history, physical examination, imaging, and a broad infectious work-up—is essential, as negative blood cultures do not rule out infection, and premature use of glucocorticoids may be harmful in cases of infectious periaortitis. Case description: We report the case of a 70-year-old man presenting with flank pain and periaortitis, in whom positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan revealed moderate-to-severe 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. Despite negative cultures, a Karius test and urine antigen confirmed Streptococcus pneumoniae as the causative agent. The patient underwent successful open surgical repair of a mycotic pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, followed by targeted antibiotic therapy. Discussion: Pneumococcal periaortitis is a rare condition with few reported cases, though S. pneumoniae has been implicated in various vascular infections including mycotic aneurysms, and diagnostic challenges persist, especially when blood cultures are negative. The Karius SpectrumTM, despite its cost and limited guidance for use, and FDG-PET/CT imaging have emerged as helpful tools in identifying infectious aetiologies, with high maximum standardized uptake value values favouring infection over autoimmune causes, as seen in this case. Conclusion: Infectious periaortitis should be suspected when there is a high uptake of FDG on PET/CT prompting an infectious disease work-up which may include a Karius test.

There is an increased risk of infection in patients with cancer that results in higher morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors can predispose these patients to infectious complications. Some such factors include immunocompromised states like neutropenia, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and graft-versus-host disease, while others include immunosuppressive agents like corticosteroids, purine analogs, monoclonal antibodies, and other emerging cancer therapeutics like CAR T-cell therapy. The NCCN Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Related Infections address infection concerns that may be observed in these immunocompromised populations and characterize the major pathogens to which patients with cancer are susceptible, with a focus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of major common and opportunistic infections. This paper highlights 2 recently updated sections of the guidelines, namely, infection concerns related to CAR T-cell therapy and antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations, including vaccination, in patients at high-risk for infections.

572 Background: The DEFeNDR (Decreasing the burden of Febrile Neutropenia through Dynamic RPM) program leverages in-home technology and centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management as an alternative to hospital-based care for cancer patients with neutropenic fever (NF). The objective of this study is to assess 30-day care utilization outcomes and patient satisfaction at 12 months after program implementation. Methods: Adult cancer patients hospitalized with NF were assessed daily for DEFeNDR program eligibility including MASCC score ≥21 (per ASCO guidelines) and no cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days. Patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program received a cellular-enabled tablet with pre-connected devices for twice-daily vital signs and symptom assessments. Patient generated data were EHR-integrated in real-time. Embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. Virtual RPM nurses responded to alerts and utilized predefined care pathways. The primary endpoint was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility comparing those who participated in the program (RPM) with those who declined (no RPM). Results: Of 85 eligible patients, 62 were offered DEFeNDR participation. Of those, 34 (54.8%) participated and 28 (45.2%) declined. Baseline characteristics and care utilization outcomes are summarized in Table 1. RPM patients experienced significantly lower mPEDI compared with unmonitored patients [5.1% (Standard Error [SE], 1.9%) vs 12.4% (SE, 2.1%); Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.032]. RPM patients also experienced a trend toward fewer total hospital days and lower 30-day readmission rate, as well as shorter mean length of stay and lower rate of ICU utilization when readmitted. Non-visit care activities (EHR clinical communications, documentation, and patient messaging) were decreased from pre-hospital baseline for 58.8% of RPM patients versus 46.6% of those unmonitored. All RPM patients completing a patient satisfaction survey (n=9) indicated that they would recommend the program to patients with a similar condition. Conclusions: Cancer patients with NF participating in the DEFeNDR program experienced a significant reduction in mPEDI and care utilization compared with those who declined. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.[Table: see text]

AbstractBackgroundThe incidence of mycobacterial infections in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is increasing, contributing to significant mortality and morbidity. This review explores the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in this population.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed with keywords and MeSH terms pertaining to the topics of nontuberculous mycobacteria, hematologic malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, cellular therapies, chimeric antigen therapies, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Additionally, we examined the reference lists of the included articles to identify other pertinent studies.ResultsDiagnosing mycobacterial disease among patients with hematologic disease and treatment‐associated immunosuppressive conditions is challenging due to the lack of distinctive clinical, radiographic, and laboratory markers, as well as the atypical manifestations compared to immunocompetent patients. Treatment involves using a combination of antibiotics for extended durations, coupled with strategies to achieve source control and reduce immunosuppression when feasible. This is complicated by the absence of clear data correlating in‐vitro drug susceptibility and clinical outcome for many antimicrobials use to treat NTM, adverse drug‐drug interactions, and the frequent challenges related to poor medication tolerability and toxicities.ConclusionThe rising incidence and corresponding clinical challenges of mycobacterial infections in this unique patient population necessitate a heightened awareness and familiarity of NTM disease by clinicians to achieve timely diagnosis and favorable treatment outcomes. image

1535 Background: Ambulatory management of select patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) may substantially decrease patients’ burden of illness and improve their quality of life, and is recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. However, in the United States, inpatient management remains the universal standard. We hereby report the health care utilization associated with the DEFeNDR remote patient monitoring (RPM) program, which leverages technology and virtual centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management of FN as an alternative to hospital-based care. Methods: Adult patients with cancer hospitalized with FN were assessed daily for eligibility to participate in the DEFeNDR program. Eligibility criteria included MASCC score >21 (per ASCO guidelines), and clinical judgment of the attending provider. Patients receiving cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days were excluded. Eligible patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program were provided a kit containing cellular-enabled, pre-connected devices to facilitate monitoring, including twice-daily vital signs and electronic symptom questionnaires. Data were EHR-integrated in real-time and embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. RPM nurses responded to alerts and escalated care as indicated by pre-specified care pathways. Program assessment was performed at 20 weeks after full implementation. The primary outcome was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility compared between those who participated in the program vs. those who declined. Results: 35 patients were offered participation in the DEFeNDR program. Of these, 17 participated and 18 declined. Baseline characteristics are provided. Participating patients experienced mPEDI of 6.9% (Standard Error [SE], 3.7%), compared with 17.7% (SE, 3.6%) for patients who declined participation. Due to small sample size, this difference (10.8%) did not reach statistical significance (Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.15). 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Mean inpatient days were also lower for patients participating in the program. Additionally, when readmitted, patients participating in RPM experienced a trend toward shorter length of stay and lower rates of intensive care unit utilization. Conclusions: A trend towards decreased burden of inpatient care is evident among patients participating in the DEFeNDR program. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring. Methods Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. Results Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months. Conclusions BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacogenomic panel testing in people with HIV (PWH). Design: Prospective, observational intervention assessment Methods: One hundred PWH were provided a comprehensive pharmacogenomic panel during routine care visits within the HIV specialty clinic of a large academic medical center. The panel determined the presence of specific genetic variants that could predict response or toxicity to commonly prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART) and non-ART medications. An HIV specialty pharmacist reviewed the results with participants and the care team. The pharmacist (1) recommended clinically actionable interventions based on the participants’ current drug therapy, (2) assessed for genetic explanations for prior medication failures, adverse effects, or intolerances, and (3) advised on potential future clinically actionable care interventions based on individual genetic phenotypes. Results: Ninety-six participants (median age 53 years, 74% white, 84% men, 89% viral load <50 copies/ml) completed panel testing, yielding 682 clinically relevant pharmacogenomic results (133 major, 549 mild–moderate). Ninety participants (89 on ART) completed follow-up visits with 65 (72%) receiving clinical recommendations based on current medication profiles. Of the 105 clinical recommendations, 70% advised additional monitoring for efficacy or toxicity, and 10% advised alteration of drug therapy. Panel results offered explanation for prior ART inefficacy in one participant and ART intolerance in 29%. Genetic explanation for non-ART toxicity was seen in 21% of participants, with genetic contributors to inefficacy of non-ART therapy identified in 39% of participants. Conclusion: Preliminary data in a small cohort of PWH demonstrates benefit of routine pharmacogenomic panel testing.

Abstract Miliary tuberculosis (TB) is a rare and potentially fatal form of disseminated TB. Disseminated TB involving the central nervous system (CNS) may be seen in up to nearly a third of miliary TB cases. We describe a case of miliary TB with CNS involvement and suspected hepatobiliary involvement in an immunocompetent patient after an elective spine surgery. Given the patient's unusual presentation in the absence of risk factors for TB, diagnosis was delayed. We were later informed that the bone graft he received during spine surgery, FiberCel (“FiberCel”) Fiber Viable Bone Matrix (Aziyo Biologics, Inc, Richmond, Calif), was contaminated with TB. This patient is 1 of almost 2 dozens reported to be affected. This case represents a novel presentation of TB due to contaminated cadaveric bone allograft matrix implantation, with notable rapid dissemination and CNS involvement.

Abstract Background Nocardia more commonly causes infection in immunocompromised individuals, notably with a relapse rate of approximately 5%. Solid organ transplant recipients will often receive post-treatment prophylaxis as the underlying immunosuppression is unable to be completely removed. However, data supporting this practice is sparse. We sought to evaluate recurrence of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients, specifically evaluating the role of post-treatment prophylaxis. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at our medical center diagnosed with nocardiosis from 2000 through 2020. We included adult SOT recipients who completed their course of Nocardia therapy. Patients were excluded if they had not yet completed therapy, died prior to completing therapy, or there was no post-therapy follow-up. The primary outcome was Nocardia recurrence. Continuous variables were presented as mean or median with interquartile range (IQR). Results 108 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. 72 (66.7%) were male and median age was 60 years (IQR 52-65). Most common SOT types were kidney (47.2%), heart (17.6%), kidney-pancreas (11.1%), and lung (11.1%). Median time from transplantation to diagnosis of nocardiosis was 396 days (IQR 154-1071). Most common sites of infection were lung (88.0%), skin (16.7%), brain (13.9%), and blood (6.5%). Multi-organ infection was present in 22.2% and 24.1% were on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis at diagnosis. Post-treatment prophylaxis was utilized in 55 (50.9%) patients (Table 1). TMP-SMX was the most common prophylaxis (87.3%; Figure 1). Four patients experienced Nocardia recurrence, 2 of which were receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis at time of relapse (Table 2). These were dosed as double strength tablet daily and weekly, respectively. Median time from treatment completion to relapse was 255.5 days (range 107-871). Figure 1. Post-Treatment Prophylaxis Regimens for Nocardia in 55 Patients Conclusion Nocardia recurrence in solid organ transplant recipients is an uncommon occurrence. Double strength daily and weekly TMP-SMX prophylaxis does not appear to be entirely protective and relapse may be dependent upon other factors such as primary treatment length. Further study into the use of post-treatment prophylaxis is warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures