Hanson, Curtis A.

Abstract Background: 'Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with isolated del(5q),' as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (SwederlowSH, et al, 2008) is a unique pathological entity with favorable outcomes. The 2016 revision to the classification expands this entity to include cases that have an additional cytogenetic abnormality, with the exception of monosomy 7 or del(7q) (Arber DA, et al, Blood 2016). The objective of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of an additional cytogenetic abnormality, other than monosomy 7 or del(7q), in patients with 'MDS with isolated del(5q)'. Methods: After due IRB approval, the Mayo Clinic MDS database (n=1067) was utilized for this study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies and cytogenetic studies performed at diagnosis. The International Society for Cytogenetic Nomenclature guidelines were used for cytogenetic nomenclature, while the 2008 and 2016 WHO criteria were used for morphological diagnosis. Results: Patient Characteristics: 72 patients (7.2%) met the 2016 WHO criteria for 'MDS with isolated del(5q)' of which 60% were female and median age was 74 years (28-90). In 61 (85%) cases del(5q) was the only cytogenetic abnormality, while in 11 (15%), del(5q) was present with an 'additional cytogenetic abnormality' (ACA). One additional case within the database had del(5q) accompanied with monosomy 7, which was not included in the analysis. Risk stratification by IPSS-R was as follows; 24 (29%) 'very low', 44 (64%) 'low' and 4 (6%) 'Intermediate' risk, with no patient classified as 'high' or 'very high' risk. At a median follow up of 43 months, 55 (76%) deaths and 5 (7%) leukemic transformations were documented. del(5q) versus del(5q) with an additional cytogenetic abnormality- phenotypic correlates: In the 'del(5q) with ACA' group, the additional abnormalities included trisomy 8 (n=4), del(20q) (n=3), der(9;18) (n=1), inv(3)(p25,q21)(n=1), -Y (n=1), and i(Xp) (n=1) (Table 1). There was no significant difference between the 'del(5q)' and 'del(5q) with ACA' groups in terms of age, gender, hemoglobin, platelet count, white cell count, absolute neutrophil count, bone marrow blast percentage or transfusion requirement. A greater proportion of the 'del(5q) with ACA' group (27%) had IPSS-R risk in the 'intermediate' category compared to the 'del(5q)' group (2%) (p=0.01). 18 of 42 cases diagnosed after 2004 (43%) were treated with lenalidomide, with no difference in the proportions treated between the two groups (p=1.00). del(5q) versus del(5q) with an additional cytogenetic abnormality- impact on overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS): The median survival of the cohort was 54 months. Survival was not significantly different between the 'del(5q)' group (median 55 months) and the 'del(5q) with ACA' group (median 38 months) (p=.75, Figure 1). This finding was consistent when analysis was restricted to patients in both groups treated with lenalidomide (p=0.29). The incidence of leukemic transformation in the del(5q) group was 5%, compared with 18% for the 'del(5q) with ACA' group (p=0.16), however there was no significant difference in LFS between the two groups (p=0.57). Conclusion : In our cohort of primary MDS patients meeting the 2016 WHO definition of 'MDS with isolated del(5q)', we confirm no significant survival difference between cases with del(5q) as the sole cytogenetic abnormality versus cases where del(5q) was accompanied by an additional cytogenetic abnormality. Table 1 Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities with del(5q): Table 1. Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities with del(5q): Figure 1 del(5q) vs del(5q) with an additional abnormality (ACA): Overall Survival Figure 1. del(5q) vs del(5q) with an additional abnormality (ACA): Overall Survival Disclosures Al-Kali: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background We have previously shown an independent adverse prognostic effect of lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count <1.2 x 10(9)/L) for survival in MDS (Jacobs et al. Am J Hematol 2010;85:160) whereas others have suggested a similar value from lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); patients with LMR ≥5 experienced shorter survival with median 67 vs. 126 months (Mushtaq et al. JCO May 20 Supp. 2016:7062). Whether or not "monocytopenia" also carries a prognostic value in MDS is currently unknown and was the main objective for the current study, which also addresses the prognostic value of LMR. Methods We retrospectively recruited 889 consecutive patients with primary MDS who were untreated at the time of referral to our institution and in whom absolute monocyte count (AMC) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at time of referral were documented. The diagnosis of MDS and leukemic transformation (LT) was made according to WHO criteria (Blood. 2009;114:937). Complete follow-up information was updated in January 2015. For the purposes of the current study, monocytopenia was defined as AMC below the lower limit of the institutional normal range, which was 0.3 to 0.9 x 10(9)/L. Comparisons of survival and other clinical parameters were performed between i) patients with and without monocytopenia and ii) patients with and without LMR ≥5. Conventional methods were used for statistical analysis. Results Patient characteristics: Median (range) values for the 889 study patients (69% males) included: age 72 (18-98), hemoglobin 9.6 g/dL (5.4-15.7), leukocyte count 3.4 x 10(9)/L (0.4-35), platelet count 106 x 10(9)/L (2-1804), circulating blasts 0% (0-18), bone marrow blasts 3% (0-19) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) 1.2 x 10(9)/L (.02-8.9). Transfusion need was documented in 33% of patients and abnormal cytogenetics in 49%. Risk stratification by the revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) was very high in 11%, high in 16%, intermediate in 21%, low in 36% and very low in 16%. The median (range) AMC for the entire study population of 889 patients was 0.22 x 10(9)/L (0.0-1.8).The number of patients with subnormal AMC was 539 (61%). After a median follow-up of 27 months, 712 (80%) deaths and 116 (13%) leukemic transformations were documented. Comparison of patients stratified by absolute monocyte count and LMR Compared to patients with AMC >0.3 x 10(9)/L, MDS patients with monocytopenia displayed younger age (p<0.0001), lower hemoglobin (p=0.005), higher red blood cell transfusion need (p=0.03), lower leukocyte count (p<0.0001), lower platelet count (p<0.0001), lower absolute neutrophil count (p<0.0001), higher circulating (p=0.03) and bone marrow (p<0.0001) blasts, higher incidence of abnormal karyotype (p=0.03), and higher risk distribution in terms of both IPSS-R (p<0.0001) and cytogenetic risk stratification by IPSS-R (p=0.03). In univariate analysis, lower AMC was associated with inferior survival (p=0.002); significance was even more apparent when comparing patients with and without monocytopenia (p=0.0003; HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5). Similarly, there was significant association between LMR and survival (p<0.0001) with patients with LMR ≥5 experiencing inferior survival (p=0.03; HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.02-1.4). In multivariable analysis, the adverse effect of monocytopenia was shown to be independent of age (p<0.0001), gender (p=0.0001), anemia (Hemoglobin <10 g/dL; p=0.002), thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 x 10(9)/L; p=0.01), neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <0.8 x 10 (9)/L; p=0.005), subnormal ALC (p=0.0008), circulating blast percentage (p=0.002), cytogenetic risk stratification by IPSS-R (p=0.006) and LMR (p=0.02) or LMR ≥5 (p=0.002); however, significance was lost when risk stratification by IPSS-R was added to the multivariable analysis (p=0.7). In regards to LMR, it retained its significance (p=0.009) during multivariable analysis that included monocytopenia or subnormal ALC, as covariates; however, significance was lost in the context of IPSS-R (p=0.24 for LMR and 0.8 for LMR ≥5) Conclusions Monocytopenia in MDS clusters with adverse disease features and both monocytopenia and higher LMR were associated with poor survival. Despite the display of prognostic independence from each other and other risk factors considered individually, the survival impact of neither monocytopenia nor LMR was found to be independent of IPSS-R. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background A recent study from the International Working Group on Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) identified prior arterial events and hypertension as risk factors for subsequent arterial thrombosis and prior venous events and age 65 years or older as risk factors for venous thrombosis in polycythemia vera (PV) (Blood 2014;124:3021). In the current single center study, we sought to validate the aforementioned findings from the IWG-MRT and look into further details regarding arterial versus venous thrombosis in PV. Methods Study patients were selected from our institutional database of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and fulfilled the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of PV (Blood. 2009;114:937). Screening for the two most frequent mutations other than JAK2 (TET2 and ASXL1) were performed according to conventional methods (Leukemia. 2014;28:2206). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis. Results Patient characteristics: Analysis was conducted on 587 patients (median age 60 years; 48% males). ASXL1 and TET2 mutational status was available in 133 patients. Among informative cases, 31% had palpable splenomegaly, 34% microcirculatory symptoms, 30% pruritus, 8% erythromelalgia, 42% hypertension, 9% diabetes and 11% were active tobacco users. TET2 and ASXL1 mutations were documented in 18% and 11%, respectively. During follow-up, 224 (38%) patients died and median follow-up for living patients was 109 months. Median survival was 16 years and leukemic or fibrotic transformations were documented in 4% and 14%, respectively. Thrombotic events: A total of 235 (40%) patients experienced at least one thrombotic event before or after diagnosis and included 153 (26%) arterial and 104 (18%) venous events. Thrombotic events were recorded before or at time of diagnosis in 146 (25%) patients and included 97 (17%) arterial and 55 (9%) venous events. Thrombotic events after diagnosis were recorded in 128 (22%) patients and included 82 (14%) arterial and 57 (10%) venous events. Associations for arterial, venous or all thrombotic events occurring at any time before or after time of diagnosis: The occurrence of any thrombotic event before or after diagnosis correlated with active tobacco use (p=0.04), diabetes history (p=0.03), hyperlipidemia (p=0.04) and major hemorrhage (p=0.03). The occurrence of any arterial event before or after diagnosis correlated with advanced age (p=0.006), diabetes history (p=0.005), hypertension history (p=0.004) and hyperlipidemia (p<0.0001). The occurrence of any venous event before or after diagnosis correlated with female sex (p=0.008), younger age (p<0.0001), lower platelet count (p=0.0014) and palpable splenomegaly (p=0.006). TET2 or ASXL1 mutations did not correlate with overall, arterial or venous thrombosis. Risk factors for arterial versus venous events after time of diagnosis: In univariate/multivariable analysis, thrombosis-free survival (TFS) was adversely affected by prior vascular events (p=0.002/0.03 multivariable) and increased leukocyte count (p=0.03/0.03); arterial thrombosis-free survival was adversely affected by prior arterial events (p<0.0001/P<0.0001), hyperlipidemia (p=0.001/0.03), hypertension (p=0.02/NS) and advanced age (p=0.02/NS); venous thrombosis-free survival was adversely affected by prior venous events (p=0.04/0.05), increased leukocyte count (p=0.0009/0.002), and younger age (p=0.02/NS). In addition, major hemorrhage at diagnosis was associated subsequent venous thrombosis in both univariate and multivariable analysis. TET2 or ASXL1 mutations did not affect the risk of overall, arterial or venous thrombosis. Conclusions In contemporarily managed patients with PV, prior vascular events predict future events for both arterial and venous thrombosis; additional risk factors included hyperlipidemia for arterial and increased leukocyte count for venous thrombosis. The current study also identifies association of arterial thrombosis in general with older age and history of hypertension, diabetes or hyperlipidemia whereas venous thrombosis was associated with younger age, female sex and palpable splenomegaly. Additional findings included association of major hemorrhage with thrombosis and higher platelet count with lower risk of venous thrombosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) previously published on 1104 patients with "essential thrombocythemia (ET)" and identified 180 (16%) misdiagnosed cases with early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PMF); the latter diagnosis was associated with inferior overall (OS), leukemia-free (LFS) and myelofibrosis-free (MFFS) survival (J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:3179). Among the 891 patients with "true" World Health Organization (WHO)-defined ET, risk factors for OS included age ≥60 years, leukocyte count ≥11 x 10(9)/L and history of thrombosis (Blood2012120:1197). In the current study, we explored the possibility that increased serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or mild grade-1 reticulin fibrosis might identify occult cases of early/prefibrotic PMF in otherwise WHO-defined ET and contribute to disease prognostication. Methods Study patients were selected from the Mayo Clinic institutional database of MPN based on their meeting the 2008 WHO criteria for diagnosis of ET (Blood. 2009;114:937). The degree of bone marrow (BM) reticulin fibrosis was based on "real life" BM reports from Mayo Clinic hematopathologists and often in accordance with the European consensus scoring system (Haematologica 2005;90:1128). Serum LDH levels were obtained at time of diagnosis or within 12 months of diagnosis, in the absence of any treatment. Information on the two most frequent non-driver mutations seen in ET (i.e. TET2 and ASXL1) was available in a subset of the patients (Blood 2015 126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis Results Patient characteristics: 183 patients (57% females) were evaluable for BM reticulin grading; median (range) levels were for age 59 years (15-88), hemoglobin 14 g/dL (9.1-17.1), platelets 812 x 10(9)/L (454-3300) and leukocyte count 8.5 x 10(9)/L (3.1-31.5). Palpable splenomegaly was reported in 27 (15%) patients and 12% displayed leukoerythroblastosis (LES). Driver mutational status was JAK2 in 72%, CALR 17%, MPL 2% and triple-negative in 9%. Thrombosis history at diagnosis was obtained from 13% of the patients and 12% experienced the same post diagnosis. Risk stratification according to the International Prognostic Scoring System for ET (IPSET) was 19% high, 43% intermediate and 38% low (Blood2012120:1197). BM reticulin fibrosis was graded "0" in 113 (62%) patients and "1" in 70 (38%). Serum LDH information was available in 110 patients (median194 U/L; range 135-669) and was increased in 31 (28%) patients. Mutational status for TET2 and ASXL1was available in 76 patients with mutational frequencies of 8% each. Clinical and laboratory correlates for mild reticulin fibrosis and serum LDH: We found no significant correlation between mild reticulin fibrosis (grade-1) and a number of clinical parameters, including age, sex, hemoglobin level, leukocyte count, platelet count, driver mutational status, LES, presence of palpable splenomegaly, thrombosis history or serum LDH (p=0.36). In contrast, increased serum LDH was associated with increased leukocyte count (p=0.002), increased platelet count (p<0.001), presence of palpable splenomegaly (p=0.03) and higher IPSET score (p=0.002); there were no significant correlations with age, sex, hemoglobin level, LES, thrombosis history, driver mutational status or TET2/ASXL1mutations. Survival analysis: After a median follow-up of 91 months, 42 (23%) deaths, 2 (1%) leukemic transformations, 7 (4%) fibrotic progressions and 22 (12%) thrombotic events were documented. In univariate analysis, risk factors for OS included age ≥60 years (p=0.002; HR 10.2, 95% CI 2.3-44.6), male sex (p=0.02; HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.2), leukocyte count ≥15 x 10(9)/L (p=0.007; HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5-14.6), and increased serum LDH (p=0.004; HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1), but not BM reticulin fibrosis (p=0.17). In multivariable analysis, age, sex and LDH remained significant; serum LDH also remained significant for OS, in the context of IPSET, whereas it did not appear to influence thrombosis-free survival (p=0.58), LFS (p=0.84) or MFFS (p=0.34). Conclusions The current study suggests that serum LDH might supersede leukocyte count as an independent risk factor for overall survival in ET; in contrast, mild reticulin fibrosis was irrelevant in terms of both prognostic value and disease phenotype. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background In polycythemia vera (PV), abnormal karyotype at diagnosis has been reported in 10% to 20% of patients and some studies have suggested an association with inferior survival (Leukemia2013;27:1874) . In the current study, we examined the prognostic contribution of abnormal karyotype, in general, and specific abnormalities, in particular, in newly diagnosed PV. Methods Study patients were selected from our institutional database of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and fulfilled the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of PV (Blood. 2009;114:937). Cytogenetic analysis and reporting was done according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (Cytogenetic and Genome Research2013;141:1-6). Assignment as "unfavorable karyotype" was according to criteria established for PMF: favorable = normal + favorable abnormalities; unfavorable = unfavorable abnormalities (Leukemia. 2011;25:82). Screening for the two most frequent mutations in PV, other than JAK2 (i.e. TET2 and ASXL1), were performed according to conventional methods (Leukemia. 2014;28:2206). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis. Results Patient characteristics: Median (range) values for the 239 study patients (53% females) included: age 62 (17-94), leukocyte count 11.7 x 10(9)/L (4.3-59.3) and platelet count 479 x 10(9)/L (37-2747). Palpable splenomegaly was present in 26% of the patients, pruritus in 27%, erythromelalgia in in 8%, hypertension in 47%, diabetes in 10% and hyperlipidemia in 28%. Thrombosis history at diagnosis was documented in 33% of the patients and 20% experienced the same after diagnosis. 73% of the patients were "high risk" by conventional risk stratification. Mutation screening for TET2 and ASXL1 was performed in 80 patients and mutational frequencies were 19% and 11% respectively. All study patients provided cytogenetic information, which was abnormal in 46 (19%) patients. The most frequent abnormalities were isolated +9 (n=11; 24% of abnormal karyotype and considered favorable), isolated del(20q) (n=8; 17% of abnormal karyotype and considered favorable), isolated loss of Y chromosome (n=7; 15% of abnormal karyotype and considered favorable) and isolated +8 (n=5; 11% of abnormal karyotype and considered unfavorable). A total of 9 (20% of abnormal karyotype) patients displayed unfavorable karyotype that included +8 in 7 patients, del(11q) in one patient and +20 in one patient. After a median follow-up of 83 months, 70 (29%) deaths, 48 (20%) thrombotic events, 20 (8%) fibrotic progressions and 7 (3%) leukemic transformations were documented. Comparison of patients with and without cytogenetic abnormalities Patients with abnormal cytogenetics were older (p=0.048), displayed lower platelet count (p=0.005) and were more likely to be high risk (p=0.02); there was no significant correlation with TET2 or ASXL1 mutation. In univariate analysis, patients with abnormal cytogenetics displayed inferior leukemia-free (p=0.007; HR 10.6, 95% CI 1.9-58.7), myelofibrosis-free (p<0.0001; HR 7.7, 95% CI 3.1-19.3) and overall (p=0.13; HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-2.8) survival. Furthermore, the difference in overall survival became significant when cytogenetic abnormalities were classified into unfavorable (p=0.006) and favorable (p=0.6) categories. On the other hand, inferior leukemia-free and myelofibrosis-free survival was noted in both patients with favorable and unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, when compared to normal karyotype. During multivariable analysis that included age and leukocytosis (≥15 x 10 (9)/L) as covariates, the adverse effect of abnormal cytogenetics on leukemia-free (p=0.009) or myelofibrosis-free (p<0.0001) survival and that of unfavorable karyotype on overall (p=0.05) survival were shown to be independent. Finally, patients with abnormal cytogenetics were less likely to experience thrombosis after diagnosis (p=0.04; HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.09-0.97), an effect that was independent of both age and thrombosis history. Conclusions Cytogenetic abnormalities in PV confer an independent adverse prognostic effect on overall, leukemia-free and myelofibrosis-free survival, but not thrombosis-free survival; the adverse effect on leukemia-free and myelofibrosis-free survival was seen with both favorable and unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) has previously identified older age, leukocytosis, venous thrombosis and abnormal karyotype as risk factors for overall survival (OS) in polycythemia vera (PV), and older age, abnormal karyotype and leukocytes ≥15 × 109/l as risk factors for leukemia-free survival (LFS) (Leukemia2013;27:1874). Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a surrogate quantitative measure of cell turnover and tumor burden. We hypothesized that, compared to leukocyte count, serum LDH might be a biologically more accurate indicator of tumor aggression and sought to examine its potential utility as a prognostic biomarker in PV. Methods Study patients were selected from our institutional database of MPN based on their meeting the 2008 or 2016 World Health Organization criteria for diagnosis of PV (Blood. 2009;114:937; Blood 2016 127:2391) and availability of serum LDH level, obtained within six months of diagnosis. Information on karyotype and targeted next-generation sequencing was available in a subset of the patients (Blood 2015 126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of diagnosis. Age and leukocyte count prognostic categories were based on previously published IWG-MRT study (Leukemia2013;27:1874). Results Patient characteristics: A total of 216 patients (50% females) met the above-outlined criteria: median (10th-90th percentile) levels were for age 63 years (38-81), hemoglobin 18 g/dL (16.6-20.7), platelets 467 x 10(9)/L (237-833), leukocyte count 11.7 x 10(9)/L (7.2-20.3) and spleen size 0 cm (0-2). Pruritus was documented in 28%, microcirculatory symptoms in 31%, erythromelalgia in 6%, hypertension in 45%, diabetes in 7%, active tobacco use in 13%, hyperlipidemia in 25%, palpable spleen in 26% and abnormal karyotype in 15% of informative cases. Grading for bone marrow reticulin fibrosis was documented for 144 patients: 50% grade "0", 42% grade "1", 7% grade "2" and 1 grade "3". Thrombosis history at diagnosis was documented in 26% of patients and occurred after diagnosis in 19%. Mutation analysis was available in 72 patients and revealed TET2 mutations in 18 (25%), ASXL1 in 5 (7%), SRSF2 in 2 (3%) and IDH2 in one (1.4%). Serum LDH levels and correlates: Median serum LDH level was 226 U/L (range 71-1008); the upper normal limit (UNL) for Mayo Clinic was 222 U/L. Increased serum LDH was recorded in 110 (51%) patients that included 26 (12%) patients with LDH ≥1.5 x UNL. A significant correlation was demonstrated between increased serum LDH and older age (p=0.007), female sex (p=0.04), leukocytosis (p=0.01), venous thrombosis history (p=0.005) and, interestingly, absence of active tobacco use (p=0.003); no correlation was noted for bone marrow reticulin fibrosis, presence of palpable splenomegaly, abnormal karyotype or ASXL1 mutation. Survival analysis: After a median follow-up of 77 months, 82 (38%) deaths, 8 (3.7%) leukemic transformations, 13 (6%) fibrotic progressions and 41 (19%) thrombotic events were documented. In univariate analysis, the following adversely affected OS: advanced age (P<0.0001), increased LDH as a continuous variable (p=0.0006), LDH ≥1.5 x UNL (p<0.0001), leukocyte count ≥15 x 10(9)/L (p=0.02) and arterial thrombosis history (p=0.001). In multivariable analysis, only age and LDH remained significant; multivariable HR (95% CI) were 5.4 (2.8-10.4) for age ≥67 years, 3.2 (1.8-6.0) for LDH ≥1.5 x UNL and 2.4 (1.2-4.7) for age 57 to 66 years. In the subset of patients with available information on karyotype and non-JAK2 mutations (n=72), advanced age, LDH ≥1.5 x UNL and ASXL1 mutations remained significantly associated with inferior survival. Serum LDH also predicted leukemic transformation (HR 17.8, 95% CI 4.1-78) and fibrotic progression (HR 11.6, 95% CI 25-53.7); in multivariable analysis, only serum LDH ≥1.5 x UNL (HR 22.3, 95% CI 2.1-234.6) and abnormal karyotype (HR 9.5, 95% CI 1.2-74.7) predicted leukemic transformation and only the former predicted fibrotic progression. Conclusions Serum LDH is a simple and inexpensive biomarker that might supersede leukocyte count as an independent predictor of overall, leukemia-free and myelofibrosis-free survival in PV; advanced age and ASXL1 mutations also retained significance for OS and abnormal karyotype for LFS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Most patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are elderly and age >65 years is an adverse prognostic factor (JCO 2013;31:2428). Our objective in the current study was to examine risk factors for survival and treatment outcome in younger patients (age ≤65 years), with emphasis on molecular and cytogenetic markers. Methods: DNA analysis for SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations was carried out on specimens obtained at time of diagnosis. We used both conventional and revised (see accompanying ASH 2014 abstract) cytogenetic risk models to query their application in the current study population. Treatment data included outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplant (HCT) and treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA), including azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC). Results: Survival: 259 patients (median age 59 years, range 18-65; 75% males) with WHO-defined CMML and age≤ 65 years were included in the study: 108 from the French consortium, 81 Mayo Clinic, 47 Moffitt Cancer Center and 23 University of Milan; 217 (84%) patients had CMML-1 and the remainder CMML-2. At a median follow-up of 26 months, 124 (48%) deaths and 79 (31 %) leukemic transformations were documented. Mutational frequencies were 34% (61/178) for ASXL1, 45% (74/165) for SRSF2, and 4% (7/168) for SETBP1. Cytogenetic data was available in 248 of 259 study patients; 56 (23%) patients displayed abnormal karyotype and the revised cytogenetic risk designations included 196 (80%) low, 29 (12%) intermediate, and 23 (9%) high. In univariate analysis, lower hemoglobin (p<0.0001), higher WBC (p=0.005), higher monocyte count (AMC) (P=0.004), lower platelet count (p=0.004), presence of circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC) (p=0.004), presence of circulating blasts (p<0.0001), bone marrow (BM) blasts ≥10% (p=0.005), WHO morphological subtype (p=0.0003), Spanish cytogenetic risk stratification (p=0.0002), revised Mayo cytogenetic risk stratification (p<0.0001), SRSF2 (p=0.03) and ASXL1 (p=0.03) mutational status predicted shortened survival. In multivariable analysis, lower hemoglobin (p<0.0002), presence of circulating blasts (p<0.0001), SRSF2 (p=0.03) and ASXL1mutational status (p=0.04) retained their negative prognostic impact. A similar analysis identified circulating IMC (p<0.0001), presence of circulating blasts (p<0.0001), and BM blast % (p=0.0002) as predictors of blast transformation (BT). Response to hypomethylating agents: Seventy-two (28%) patients received HMA (AZA-46, DAC-26, both-6). In the AZA group, median number of cycles was 5 (range; 1-44), median duration of therapy 5 months (range;1-59) with 4 (6%) receiving DAC on progression and 26 (42%) proceeding with HCT. Over-all response rate (ORR) was 25% (6/24) and included complete response (CR) in 2 (8%) patients, partial response (PR) in 2 (8%) and hematological improvement in 2 (8%). In the DAC group, median number of cycles was 6 (2-25), median duration of therapy 5 months (range;1-49), with 2 (8%) receiving AZA on progression; ORR was 50% (7/14) and included CR in 4 (29%) patients, PR in 1 (7%) and HI in 2 (14%). ASXL1 (p=0.4), SRSF2 (p=0.7) mutational status or karyotype (p=0.5 for Spanish and 0.3 for revised Mayo) did not correlate with response to HMA. Allogeneic stem cell transplant: 50 patients underwent HCT. Conditioning regimen was reported in 41 patients and included myeloablative (MA) in 14 (34%) (median age 51 years, 27-62) and reduced intensity (RIC) in 27 (66%) (median age 48 years, 18-65). Donor source was documented in 40 patients and included matched related in 19 (48%), matched unrelated in 12 (30%), mismatched unrelated in 4, haploidentical in 2 and umbilical cord transplant in one. 27 (63%) patients had chronic GVHD (50% in MA group and 80% in the RIC group). Among 40 evaluable patients, 23 (57%) achieved CR, 8 (21%) relapsed and 8 (21%) died from transplant-related complications. ASXL1 (p=0.9), SRSF2 (p=0.5) mutational status or karyotype (p=0.2 for Spanish and 0.3 for revised Mayo) did not affect transplant outcome. Conclusions: Survival in young CMML patients is poor and even worse in the presence of SRSF2 or ASXL1 mutations, anemia or circulating blasts. Treatment outcome was more impressive with transplant than it was with HMA and neither was influenced by karyotype or ASXL1/SRSF2 mutational status. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background : DNMT3A mutations result in epigenetic dysregulation and impart a negative prognostic impact in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. In chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), DNMT3A mutations are seen in 2-5% of patients. In a large Groupe Français des Myélodysplasies (GFM) study (n=312), DNMT3A mutations were seen in 2% and were not included in further survival analyses (Itzykson JCO 2013). In a prior Mayo Clinic study (n=175), DNMT3A mutations were seen in 5% (n=9) and on univariate, but not multivariate analysis (Patnaik Blood C J 2016), were associated with shortened over-all survival (OS). We carried out this study on a larger CMML cohort (n=261), with more (n=15) informative cases to assess the impact of DNMT3A mutations. Methods : 261 patients with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined CMML were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies and cytogenetics performed at diagnosis. Targeted capture assays were carried out on BM DNA specimens obtained at diagnosis for the following genes; TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, EZH2, SUZ12, SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, U2AF1, PTPN11, Tp53, SH2B3, RUNX1, CBL, NRAS, KRAS, JAK2, CSF3R, FLT3, KIT, CALR, MPL, NPM1, CEBPA, IKZF, and SETBP1. The 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria were used. Results: Among the 261 study patients, 65% were males and median age was 70 years (range, 28-91). 154 (59%), 64 (25%) and 43 (16%) patients were classified as CMML-0, 1 and 2, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 174 (67%) deaths and 37 (14%) leukemic transformations (LT) were documented. Mutational frequencies ≥4% were encountered in; TET2 45%, ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 40%, NRAS 14%, SETBP1 13%, CBL 10%, JAK2 7%, RUNX1 6%, DNMT3A 6%, U2AF1 6%, SF3B1 5%, ZRSR2 4%, Tp53 4%, and IDH2 4%. i) DNTM3A mutated CMML: phenotypic and molecular correlates DNMT3A mutations were seen in 15 (6%) patients; 64% male with a median age of 64 years. DNMT3A amino acid substitutions included; R882H 50%, R882C 29%, R910P 7%, R598* 7% and R320* 7%. The median variant allele frequency burden was 45%. Concurrent gene mutations were detected in; TET2 43%, ASXL1 21%, SF3B1 21%, U2AF1 14%, RUNX1 14%, SETBP1 14%, NRAS 14%, SRSF2 7%, JAK2 7% and Tp53 7%. There was no difference between DNMT3A mutated and wild-type patients in terms of age and gender distribution, hemoglobin level, leukocyte, monocyte (AMC), and platelet counts, peripheral blood (PB) or BM blast content. Concurrent gene mutations were equally distributed with the exception for a higher prevalence of SF3B1 (p=0.003) and a lower prevalence of SRSF2 (p=0.004) mutations in DNMT3A mutated CMML. Four (29%) patients underwent leukemic transformation. ii) Impact on OS and leukemia-free survival (LFS): Median survival for the entire cohort (n=261) was 24 months. In univariate analysis, survival was shorter in DNMT3A mutated (median 8 months) versus wild-type (median 27 months) patients (p=0.0007; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.7; Figure 1A). Other variables of significance, in univariate analysis, included lower hemoglobin (p=0.002), higher leukocyte count (p=0.0009), higher AMC (p=0.0012), PB blast % (p=0.001), circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC, p=0.01), BM blast % (p=0.045), abnormal karyotype (p=0.02), and ASXL1 (p=0.01) mutations. Survival was also adversely affected by the presence of either (n=133) or both (n=3) ASXL1/DNMT3A mutations (0=0.007, Figure 1B). In multivariable analysis (MVA) excluding ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations, hemoglobin (p=0.03), IMC (p=0.013) and AMC (p=0.02) retained significance. When ASXL1 mutations were added to the MVA, ASXL1 (p=0.01) mutations, AMC (p=0.012) and IMC (p=0.03) retained significance. Similarly, when only DNMT3A mutations were added to the MVA, DNMT3A (p=0.003) mutations, IMC (p=0.01) and AMC (p=0.02) retained significance. When both DNMT3A and ASXL1 mutations were added to the MVA, only DNMT3A (p<0.0001) and ASXL1 (p=0.004) mutations remained significant. DNMT3A mutations predicted shortened OS, independent of the ASXL1 inclusive GFM model (p<0.0001) and Mayo Molecular Model (p=0.002). DNMT3A mutations (p=0.0018), along with low hemoglobin levels (p=0.003) independently predicted for a shorter LFS. Conclusions: DNMT3A mutations are seen in ~5% of patients with CMML and impart a negative prognostic impact on both OS and LFS. This finding warrants inclusion of DNMT3A mutations in molecularly integrated CMML prognostic models. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The impact of JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy on the natural history of myelofibrosis remains unclear. While a Phase 3 study showed that overall survival of ruxolitinib-treated intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis patients was superior as compared to placebo-treated patients, it remains unclear whether such an advantage would persist in patients receiving standard therapy, and whether this result is generalizable to other JAK inhibitors. We conducted a sponsor-independent, single-center retrospective analysis of overall and leukemia-free survival after long-term follow up in patients receiving JAKi treatment with comparison to two control populations: (i) a contemporaneously diagnosed (2005 onwards) primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patient cohort receiving standard therapy (JAKi and pomalidomide naïve); and (ii) a pomalidomide treated patient cohort (JAKi-naïve). Methods Baseline clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data were collected at the onset of study treatment with the first JAKi or pomalidomide, or at the time of first referral for patients receiving standard therapy. Information regarding bone marrow karyotype and DIPSS-plus risk status was available for all patients. Information on survival and leukemic transformation was updated in July 2013. Results The 3 patient groups were: (i) JAKi-treated: n=157, median age 65 years, range 34-89. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 20 (13%), Int-2 66 (42%), and High 71 (45%). Median follow up from first JAKi treatment was 30 months (range 1-67 months); during this period, 72 deaths (46%) and 14 (9%) leukemic transformations were documented. The first JAKi was ruxolitinib in 51 patients (33%), momelotinib (CYT387) in 79 (50%), and fedratinib (SAR302503) in 27 (17%). The proportion of patient deaths and leukemic transformation (median follow up, range) per specific JAKi was: ruxolitinib 57% and 12% (40 months, 2-67), momelotinib 43% and 9% (29 months, 1-42), and fedratinib 33% and 4% (21 months, 2-53), respectively. (ii) Control#1 (Pomalidomide-treated): n=69, median age 67 years, range 36-87. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 0 (0%), Int-2 28 (41%), and High 41 (59%). Median follow up was 25 months (range 2-70 months); during this period, 47 deaths (68%) and 7 (10%) leukemic transformations were documented. (iii) Control# 2 (Standard therapy): n=319, median age 66 years, range 22-90. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 98 (31%), Int-2 122 (38%), and High 99 (31%). Median follow up from time of referral was 18 months (range 1-92 months); during this period, 101 deaths (32%) and 18 (6%) leukemic transformations were documented. For patients with Int-2 or high-risk disease (n=221), 92 deaths (42%) and 13 (6%) leukemic transformations were recorded (median follow up 16 months, range 1-92). The survival analysis focused on DIPSS-plus Int-2 and high-risk patients for all groups, reflecting the population predominantly selected for treatment on JAKi clinical trials. There was no significant difference in the median overall survival of myelofibrosis patients treated with JAKi (39 months) versus standard therapy (35 months) versus pomalidomide (26 months) (p=0.12) (Figure). The 5-year survival rates were 31%, 33% and 26%, respectively. Similarly, the median overall survival of patients treated with ruxolitinib (35 months), momelotinib (37 months) or fedratinib (42 months) was not significantly different (p=0.4). Baseline DIPSS-plus status (ie, Int-2 vs. high-risk) effectively stratified JAKi treated patients in terms of overall survival (median survival 31 vs. 60 months; p=0.0002). There was no significant difference in leukemia-free survival when comparing JAKi-treated patients versus standard therapy verus pomalidomide-treated patients (p=0.6) (Figure). The estimated 5-year risk of leukemic transformation was 17%, 12% and 13%, respectively. Conclusions With long-term follow up, myelofibrosis patients receiving JAKi therapy exhibited similar overall and leukemia-free survival as compared to two control populations (DIPSS-plus matched standard therapy and pomalidomide-treated patients). Baseline DIPSS-plus status was a powerful predictor of overall survival in JAKi treated patients. While underscoring the limitation of a non-head-to-head retrospective comparison, there was no significant difference in overall or leukemia-free survival when comparing individual JAKi drugs. Disclosures: Pardanani: Bristol Myers Squibb: Clinical trial support Other; Sanofi: Clinical trial support, Publication support services, Clinical trial support, Publication support services Other; PharmaMar: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other; JW Pharmaceutical Corp.: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other. Off Label Use: Use of Ruxolitinib, Momelotinib, Fedratinib and Pomalidomide for treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Trial setting.

Abstract Background : An increased incidence of second skin and visceral malignancies in comparison to the general population has been reported in patients with hematologic neoplasms such as, chronic lymhocytic leukemia (CLL) (~11-36%) (Tsimberidou, JCO, 2009),chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (4-6%) (Miranda, Leukemia 2016)and multiple myeloma (MM) (3-4.3%) (Palumbo, Lancet Oncol 2014).Diverse etiologies exist for this association. We carried out this study to describe the spectrum of second malignancies in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Methods : Patients with World Health Organization defined CMML were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies performed at diagnosis. We only included malignancies that were diagnosed at the time of CMML diagnosis or subsequent to it. Patients that had concomitant systemic mastocytosis (n=18), therapy related CMML (n=19) and those that underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n=23) were excluded. Standard cancer specific diagnostic and staging methods were utilized. Results: The study included 378 patients (median age 71 years; 66% males). Seventy-one concomitant and/or subsequent second malignancies were identified in thirty-two (8%) patients. Age group distribution was; 50-59 years 1 (1%), 60-69 years 21 (30%), 70-79 years 30 (42%) and ≥ 80 years 19 (27%) second malignancies. 22 (69%) patients had 1 second malignancy, 4 (13%) had 2, 2 (6%) had 4 (skin neoplasms), while 4 (13%) patients had ≥ 5 second malignancies (Table one). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 284 (75%) deaths and 54 (14%) leukemic transformations were documented. i) Second hematological malignancies: Thirteen (18%) concomitant (n=7, 54%) and subsequent hematological malignancies (n=6, 46%) were observed in 13 (3.5%) patients. In addition, 10 (3%) pre malignant states including, 7 patients with MGUS and 3 with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) were seen. In one case each, the MGUS and MBL evolved into multiple myeloma (after 16 months) and CLL (after 30 months), respectively. Concomitant malignancies included: polycythemia vera (n=2, 15%), MM (n=2, 15%), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (n=1, 8%), splenic lymphoma (n=1, 8%), ALK-rearranged T-cell lymphoma (n=1, 8%), while subsequent malignancies included: MM (n=1, 8%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=1, 8%), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (n=1, 8%), CLL (n=2, 15%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1, 8%). Four (31%) patients needed chemotherapy, with outcomes including: complete remission in one case (multiple myeloma), progression of disease in 2 (multiple myeloma and diffuse large B cell-lymphoma) and partial response in 1 case (ALK rearranged T cell lymphoma). CMML related cytopenias did not preclude patients from getting chemotherapy. Three patients died from causes related to their second malignancies. ii) Cutaneous malignancies: Fifty-one (71%) concomitant (n=12, 24%) and subsequent cutaneous malignancies (n=39, 76%) were seen in 13 (3%) patients. The concomitant malignancies included: 7 (14%) basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 5 (10%) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), while subsequent cancers included: 3 (6%) malignant melanoma, 7 (14%) BCC and 29 (57%) SCC. Four cases (8%) were locally advanced and four patients (8%) had recurrent lesions. A concomitant diagnosis of BCC and SCC was made in 8 patients (16%). All patients were treated surgically or with electrodesiccation and curettage. No deaths or metastases were reported. iii) Visceral malignancies: Seven (10%) subsequent visceral malignancies were seen in 6 (1%) patients. These included; colonic adenocarcinoma (n=2, 29%), bladder adenocarcinoma (n=1, 14%), endometrial adenocarcinoma (n=1, 14%), prostate adenocarcinoma (n=1, 14%), clear cell renal carcinoma (n=1, 14%) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=1, 14%). All the cases were localized and surgically resected, with two patients (colonic and endometrial adenocarcinoma) needing adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. All patients achieved complete remission with no mortality related to second malignancies. Conclusions: Approximately 8% of CMML patients have second cutaneous (3.5%), hematological (3.5%) and visceral (1%) malignancies, with most of these occurring in and beyond the seventh decade (~70%) of life. Mortality related to second cancers was low (2%), with most patients receiving appropriate surgical and adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.