Xie, Deborah X.

ABSTRACT Objective Total laryngectomy (TL) represents a major operation often performed on medically complex patients. The impact of blood transfusion in TL patients is not well defined. Here, we utilize a national database to characterize these patients and further investigate a potential dose‐dependent relationship between transfusion and postoperative outcomes. Methods The National Surgical Quality Program (NSQIP) was queried for patients who underwent TL with/without neck dissection (CPT 31360, 31365) between 2014 and 2022. Total units of transfused blood were only available for patients between 2020 and 2023. Statistical analysis involved hypothesis testing, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Among 2311 patients, 413 (17.9%) received transfusions. Non‐White race, ASA Class ≥ 3, hypertension, cancer with distant metastases, bleeding disorders, and elevated BUN, WBC, and INR were associated with transfusion ( p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified hypertension (OR 1.81), bleeding disorders (OR 2.64), ASA ≥ 3 (OR 2.40), concurrent free flap (OR 3.75) and lower hematocrit (OR 0.85) as predictors. Transfused patients had longer hospital stays (12 vs. 9 days), increased complications (e.g., stroke, DVT), higher reoperation (23.2% vs. 13.9%) and mortality (2.7% vs. 0.8%) ( p < 0.05). ROC analysis suggested transfusion > 2.5 units was associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusion TL remains a major surgical endeavor that can be associated with lengthy and complicated hospital courses. We show that perioperative transfusion may be associated with increased hospital stay, reoperation, and mortality in TL patients, with a potential dose‐dependent effect. Our study reinforces the risks associated with blood transfusion and further supports the thoughtful utilization of blood products in TL patients. Level of Evidence 3.

BackgroundPost‐viral olfactory dysfunction (PVOD) is one of the most common causes of olfactory loss. Despite its prevalence, optimal treatment strategies remain unclear. This article provides a comprehensive review of PVOD treatment options and provides evidence‐based recommendations for their use.MethodsA systematic review of the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies with defined olfactory outcomes of patients treated for PVOD following medical, surgical, acupuncture, or olfactory training interventions were included. The Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual and Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS) instrument recommendations were followed in accordance with a previously described, rigorous, iterative process to create an evidence‐based review with recommendations.ResultsFrom 552 initial candidate articles, 36 studies with data for 2183 patients with PVOD were ultimately included. The most common method to assess olfactory outcomes was Sniffin’ Sticks. Broad treatment categories included: olfactory training, systemic steroids, topical therapies, a variety of heterogeneous non‐steroidal oral medications, and acupuncture.ConclusionBased on the available evidence, olfactory training is a recommendation for the treatment of PVOD. The use of short‐term systemic and/or topical steroids is an option in select patients after careful consideration of potential risks of oral steroids. Though some pharmacological investigations offer promising preliminary results for systemic and topical medications alike, a paucity of high‐quality studies limits the ability to make meaningful evidence‐based recommendations for the use of these therapies for the treatment of PVOD.