Masry, Hicham El

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are at increased risk for mortality. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in terms of mortality reduction has not been established in this population. Aim: To evaluate the survival benefit of CRT, either CRT-D or CRT-P, in a large cohort of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and reduced EF. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with confirmed CA and reduced EF (<40%) between 2009 and 2023 across Mayo Clinic sites. Patients were stratified into three groups: no device, CRT with pacemaker function (CRT-P), and CRT with defibrillator function (CRT-D). CRT devices were indicated for low ejection fraction less than 40% and patients who had chronic heart failure with a wide QRS. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated, and log-rank tests were used for comparison. A secondary analysis was conducted combining CRT-P and CRT-D versus no device (EF <40%), and a tertiary analysis compared CRT-P versus CRT-D. Results: Among 184 patients [36 AL (20%), 148 ATTR (80%)], 38 (19%) had no cardiac device and EF <40%, 20 (11%) received CRT-P, and 116 (63%) received CRT-D. The median follow-up was 3.4 years (1.7, 5.0). The probability of survival was significantly higher in the CRT group compared to the no device-EF<40 group (Log Rank p=0.013; figure B). Among patients receiving CRT, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between those receiving CRT-P and those receiving CRT-D (Log Rank p=0.5; figure C). Conclusion: In patients with cardiac amyloidosis and reduced EF, CRT is associated with significantly improved survival compared to no device. No mortality difference was observed between CRT-P and CRT-D. Prospective studies are warranted.

Background: A blanking period allowing for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has historically been standardized to 90 days. With the recent introduction of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for PVI and emerging in vitro data suggesting a shorter inflammatory timeframe, it remains unclear whether recurrences during this 90-days period reflect incomplete procedural success or merely transient inflammatory changes. Research Question: In patients undergoing PVI with PFA, do early AF recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days predict late AF recurrences beyond the standardized 90-day blanking period? Methods: Patients undergoing PFA for AF were retrospectively included. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia, and high-density (HD) mapping, with PVI and additional ablation lines applied at the operator’s discretion. PFA catheters included Farawave, PulseSelect, and Sphere-9. AF recurrences were defined as documented episodes on 12-lead ECG or cardiac monitoring devices, confirmed by interpretation from an experienced cardiologist. Survival analyses were conducted based on the occurrence of early recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days post-ablation. Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios were reported. This study was approved by our institutional review board. Results: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest real-world study reporting outcomes of PFA for AF in the United States. A total of 1,214 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 66.4 years; 31.9% were female, and 22.4% underwent redo PVI. Six-month AF recurrence-free survival was 79% (95% CI, 75–83%) for the overall cohort. Patients experiencing early recurrence at 30, 60, and 90 days had a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence beyond the standardized 90-day blanking period (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.7–5.9, P < 0.01; HR 5.0, 95% CI 3.6–7.1, P < 0.01; and HR 6.9, 95% CI 4.9–9.6, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Early recurrences at 30, 60, and 90 days post-ablation are strongly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence beyond the 90-day blanking period. These findings challenge the traditional concept of blanking period after PFA and suggest that early recurrence may indicate incomplete procedural success rather than transient inflammation.

Introduction: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a rare connective tissue disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the COL3A1 gene, often leading to arterial, intestinal, and uterine rupture. While vascular complications are well-documented, the prevalence and characteristics of cardiac arrhythmias in this population remain underexplored. Aim: To assess the prevalence of arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities in patients with confirmed vEDS. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted across all three Mayo Clinic sites. Patients with vEDS were initially identified using an electronic data extraction tool. Each case was subsequently confirmed through detailed chart review. Additional reviews were performed to assess the prevalence of heart blocks and both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS to determine the prevalence of each arrhythmia type. Results: A total of 132 patients with confirmed vEDS were included in the study. The mean age was 45.7 ± 13 years. The cohort was predominantly white (93.7%), with 47 males (35.6%) and 85 females (64.4%). Atrial arrhythmias were identified in 15 patients (11.4%), including atrial fibrillation in 14 (10.6%) and atrial flutter in 8 (6.1%). Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was observed in 15 patients (11.4%). Conduction abnormalities included first-degree AV block in 8 (6.1%), second-degree AV block in 3 (2.3%), left bundle branch block in 8 (6.1%), and right bundle branch block in 15 (11.4%) patients. Ventricular arrhythmias were observed in 6 patients (4.5%) with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 6 (4.5%) with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 7 (5.3%) with ventricular fibrillation. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) or orthostatic hypotension was documented in 18 patients (13.6%). Conclusion: Although arrhythmias are not the most common manifestation of vEDS, their prevalence in this cohort is notably higher than in the general population and tends to occur at a younger age. These findings support the consideration of routine screening for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with vEDS as part of their long-term cardiovascular management.

Background: Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is a distinct myocardial disorder associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are frequently used in this population, data on predictors of shock therapy remain limited. Aim: Evaluation of a large cohort of patients with NCCM and ICDs to identify incidence and clinical factors associated with ICD shock Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with confirmed NCCM between 2002 and 2023 at all Mayo Clinic sites. Baseline clinical data, genetic findings, cardiac imaging parameters, and device-related outcomes were collected through detailed chart review. Multivariable Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Results: Among 145 patients with NCCM who received ICDs, the median age was 45 years (IQR: 34–56), with 75 (52%) female and 120 (83%) White. The median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 35% (IQR: 22.5–47.5%), and the median follow-up from ICD implantation was 6.4 years (IQR: 2.9–11.0). Most ICDs (124, 85.5%) were implanted for primary prevention. Appropriate shocks were observed in 37 patients (25.5%), with 14 (9.8%) experiencing three or more appropriate shocks. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 15 patients (10.3%). Device-related complications were reported in 22 patients (15.2%), including infections in 4 (2.8%), lead fractures or dislodgement in 17 (11.9%), and pneumothorax in 1 (0.7%). Clinical predictors of shocks are illustrated in the figure. Conclusion: ICD therapy for NCCM patients prevented SCD in 25.5% of patients. Syncope, RBBB, troponin T >30 ng/L, and imaging-based apical trabeculations were independently associated with ICD shocks in patients with NCCM. These factors may aid in risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with confirmed and possible cardiac sarcoidosis who had an ICD implant and identify predictors of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in this patient population. Methods: We performed a retrospective study patients with a diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) at Mayo Clinic and had an ICD implanted for primary or secondary prevention indication. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of possible or confirmed (biopsy-proven) CS with an ICD implanted between 1993 and 2022 were included. Primary outcomes included sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VT) resulting in a documented appropriate ICD shock and death from any cause. Secondary outcomes included ICD-related complications. Results: We identified 148 patients, in which 23 patients (15.5%) experienced VT events with a total of 160 treated episodes. 4 patients (2.7%) experienced inappropriate ICD shocks (11 episodes). During a median follow up of 3.1 years, 26 patients deceased, and the overall survival was 98% and 77% at 1 and 5 year. Older age, CAD, CKD, paced rhythm and QRS duration were associated with worse survival (Figure 1 – 4) . Device related complications were rare, except for the higher percentage of CHF in patients with VT after implant, however this was not statistically significant. Patients with ICD therapies were younger (53 vs 58 years, p=0.029), had higher LGE burden (26.9 vs 16.3%, p=0.01), and higher percentage of LV mass (26.9 vs 16.3, p=0.011). Multivariate logistic regression model which showed that patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis had significantly higher odds of VT events (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.02 to 9.08, p = 0.046). In patients with increased LV mass (every 10 g increase), the odds of developing VT increased by 1.49 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.19, p = 0.041). LV mass and LGE percentage showed fair ability of predicting the outcome by ROC analysis. Youden’s index showed 26 for LV mass and 16% for LGE percent as the optimal cut-off points for predicting VT outcomes (Figure 5) . The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were 81.8%, 74.1%, 37.5%, 95.6% and 75.4% respectively for an LV mass of 26 grams and 81.8%, 63.8%, 30.0%, 94.9% and 66.7% respectively for an LGE percentage of 16%. Conclusion: LGE burden continues to be a major predictor for VT events in patients with CS. Myocardial tissue burden and electrical abnormalities from CS predict mortality than myocardial function loss.

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Data regarding the optimal timing of CIED reimplantation after TLE are not well established. Objective: This study aims to assess the 5-year outcomes of early (≤7 days) versus non-early (>7 days) CIED reimplantation following TLE for CIED infection using a multi-national database. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for CIED infection between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Patients were further categorized into two groups: early CIED reimplantation (≤7 days from TLE) and non-early CIED reimplantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by including patient demographics, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events during a 5-year study period. Results: A total of 1668 patients in the early CIED reimplantation group and 1550 in the non-early group were identified. After PSM, 1327 patients in each group were analyzed. Compared to non-early group, early CIED reimplantation group was associated with significantly higher odds of all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 1.837, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.532-2.203) and repeated device infection (OR: 1.569, 95% CI: 1.314-1.873) at 5-year follow-up. However, no significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.778-1.104), HF exacerbation (OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 0.855-1.218), cardiac arrest (OR:0.924, 95% CI: 0.739-1.157), stroke (OR: 1.169, 95% CI: 0.915-1.494), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.163, 95% CI: 0.749-1.808), major bleeding (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 0.857-1.358) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.759-1.123) between the two groups. Conclusion: Early reimplantation of CIED following TLE of infected devices was associated with worse outcomes in all-cause hospitalization and repeated device infection. Further large prospective studies are needed to define the optimal timing of device reimplantation.

Background: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) are rare connective tissue disorders characterized by arterial fragility and early-onset vascular events. Stroke risk is elevated in both conditions, but data on stroke subtypes and anticoagulation use remain limited. Understanding the relationship between stroke mechanisms, arrhythmias, and antithrombotic therapy is crucial in these genetically vulnerable populations. Aim: To assess the prevalence and subtypes of stroke in patients with LDS and vEDS. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted across three Mayo Clinic sites. Patients with LDS and vEDS were identified using an electronic data extraction tool, followed by manual chart review for diagnostic confirmation. Stroke subtypes, ischemic, dissection-related, and hemorrhagic, were classified based on imaging findings and clinical documentation. Data on atrial arrhythmias, valve replacement status, and anticoagulation use (including warfarin and apixaban) were systematically collected and analyzed. Results: In the LDS cohort, 12 of 94 patients (12.8%) experienced a stroke: 8 ischemic (8.5%), 3 dissection-related (3.2%), and 1 hemorrhagic (1.1%). Atrial fibrillation or flutter was present in 7 patients (58.3%), 6 of whom had ischemic strokes. Among the stroke patients, 9 (75%) had prosthetic valves, 6 mechanical and 3 bioprosthetic, and 4 (33.3%) were on warfarin at the time of the event. In the vEDS cohort, 22 of 132 patients (16.7%) had strokes: 13 ischemic (9.8%) and 9 dissection-related (6.8%). No hemorrhagic strokes were observed. Atrial fibrillation or flutter was documented in 12 patients (54.5%), with 10 experiencing ischemic and 2 dissection-related strokes. Of these, 5 (22.7%) were on apixaban, 3 (13.6%) on warfarin, and 4 (18.2%) were not anticoagulated. None of the vEDS stroke patients had mechanical valves. Conclusion: Ischemic stroke is the most frequent cerebrovascular event in both LDS and vEDS, but dissection-related strokes are more common in vEDS. Atrial arrhythmias often precede ischemic events, yet anticoagulation use varies widely. One-third of dissection-related strokes occurred despite antithrombotic therapy, raising concerns about current management strategies. These findings support the need for syndrome-specific guidelines for stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, and anticoagulation in LDS and vEDS patients.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is increasingly recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndrome, particularly in young to middle-aged women. While most presentations are associated with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a subset of patients present with acute systolic dysfunction. The characteristics of patients who recover their LVEF are not clearly defined. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 495 patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD treated at three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Rochester, and Florida) from 1994 to 2023. Patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and congenital heart disease were excluded. Baseline LVEF at SCAD presentation was categorized into <35%, 35–39%, 40–49%, and ≥50%. Follow-up LVEF was assessed by echocardiography performed between 30 days and 1 year post-SCAD. The primary outcome was improvement in LVEF to ≥50% at follow-up. Results: A total of 495 SCAD patients were included. At presentation, 26% had reduced LVEF: 6% had LVEF <35%, 5% had LVEF between 35–39%, and 15% had LVEF between 40–49%. Patients who did not normalize their EF at follow-up were slightly younger (45 vs. 48 years, p=0.04), were more likely to have had an in-hospital cardiac arrest (13% vs. 4%, p=0.01), required mechanical circulatory support during their care, and had SCAD involving the left main artery (11% vs. 2%, p=0.01). Predictors of EF normalization included SCAD which involved the obtuse marginals (15% vs. 4%, p<0.05). The group with the lowest EF at presentation had the highest probability of persistent EF <50% at follow-up (32% for those with LVEF <35%) while patients who had normal EF at presentation had a 6% chance of having EF <50% at follow-up (Figure 1). Conclusions: Our study shows that the majority of SCAD patients have normal EF at presentation. 80% of those with reduced EF at presentation will normalize at follow-up. Predictors of low EF at follow-up included dissection involving the left main artery, lower EF at SCAD presentation, in-hospital arrest and use of mechanical circulatory support.

Introduction: Complex congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with atrial arrhythmias have higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to less complex CHD patients. This study aims to identify echocardiographic predictors of thromboembolism (TE) and major bleeding in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) or Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum (PA-IVS) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). Methods: This cohort study included patients with ToF or PA-IVS who had a diagnosis of AF who underwent a TTE across three sites. Outcomes were incidence rate of major bleeding or TE, calculated using univariable and multivariable cox regression with interaction for anticoagulant choice and fractional area change (FAC). The HAS-BLED score was augmented with major predictors of bleeding, and receiver operator curves compared. Results: We included 300 patients (287 ToF [95.7%], 13 PA-IVS [4.3%]), mean age 45.6 years. Most received warfarin (227 [79.4%]), 40 (13%) used DOACs, and 5 (1.6%) used enoxaparin. TTE predictors of TE included large LVOT diameter ≥3cm (HR 8.92, p=0.002), small LVOT VTI (p=0.014), FAC <30% (HR 7.08, p=0.026) and moderate RV dysfunction (HR 10.75, p=0.026). Predictors of major bleeding included moderate tricuspid regurgitation (HR 2.40, p=0.022), right atrial pressure (1.12, p<0.001), severe RA enlargement (HR 2.30, p=0.048), RV mid diameter (HR 1.06, p=0.005), RV end diastolic area (HR 1.04, p=0.021), RV end systolic area (HR 1.05, p=0.016) elevated RVSP and FAC ≤45% (HR 0.37, p=0.016). Among warfarin users, impaired RV function (FAC ≤45%) was linked to reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.27, p=0.025). There was a nonsignificant trend towards higher bleeding in DOAC users with FAC >45% (HR 3.87, p=0.284), but significantly higher bleeding in DOAC users with FAC ≤45% (HR 12.41, p=0.008) vs. warfarin users with normal RV function (table 1). We developed an augmented HAS-BLED score: the standard score plus one point for moderate-to-severe pulmonic or tricuspid regurgitation and one for FAC ≤45%. This outperformed the standard HAS-BLED in predicting major bleeding (AUC 0.67 augmented vs. 0.57 un-augmented, p=0.008) (figure 1). Conclusion: Echocardiographic evidence of right heart disease is a strong predictor of major bleeding in patients with ToF or PA-IVS. FAC is a useful tool to determine excess major bleeding risk, particularly in DOAC users. Augmenting HAS-BLED with right heart parameters improves diagnostic accuracy.