Bofferding, Anne

Background/Objectives: Pectus excavatum (PEx) is considered, at least partially, a familial disorder. A variety of inheritance patterns, associations with genetic syndromes, and pathogenic variants have been reported. However, the etiology of this condition is still not completely understood, and no known genes have been identified as definitive contributors. Methods: Family members with a confirmed PEx diagnosis (one proband and two first-degree relatives) and non-affected members were recruited into this study. Exome sequencing was performed on all affected familial PEx cases to systematically screen for candidate genes that are likely to be causative for PEx, and on non-affected family members for variant segregation analysis. Results: Ten families, with three affected members each, participated, providing thirty familial PEx cases. Different inheritance patterns were represented across the ten pedigrees, with possible incomplete penetrance. Genetic variants in REST (essential for neuronal development and associated with pectus deformities in prior studies), SMAD4 (variants can predispose individuals to thoracic aortic diseases), and COL5A (associated with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome and Fibromuscular dysplasia) were initially identified as potentially linked to the development of pectus deformities and segregated with the phenotype. No variants were shared across families in the studied population. Conclusions: Germline exome sequencing of families with multiple individuals affected by PEx in our study identified potential gene candidates linked to PEx. These candidates are private to individual families and no strong candidates shared across multiple families were identified. These findings suggest that the inheritance of PEx may not be strongly related to a shared single genetic variant in known genes. Given the accumulating evidence for the genetic basis of familial PEx, further studies, including polygenic analyses, as well as assessment of the non-coding genome and possible epigenetic markers are warranted.

e24114 Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing is used increasingly in cancer supportive care for drug and dose selection, and side effects prediction with antidepressants, antiemetics, and pain medications. Genetic variants in genes that encode for drug metabolizing enzymes (CYPs), transporters (SLC6A4) and drug receptors (HTR2A, OPRM1, etc) are well known for these medications. They contribute to inter-individual differences in medication safety and efficacy. We report on their frequency and effect on supportive care drugs in patients with solid tumors. Methods: Between 06/06/19 and 12/18/19, solid tumor cancer patients at Mayo Clinic Arizona were enrolled in a PGx prospective study. They were genotyped using a multi-gene panel, OneOme RightMed. The panel assessed 27 genes, including CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, COMT, OPRM1, GRIK4, HTR2A, SLC6A4, associated with pain medications, antidepressants, and antiemetics. PGx pharmacist provided medication recommendations and dose adjustments based on PGx test results and concurrent medications. Results: 200 patients were swabbed and 196 patients were genotyped. The results were available within 5 days. All patients were also assessed for pheno-conversion (drug-drug-gene interactions) by a pharmacist. Recommendations were made based on predicted phenotype. Various solid tumor types were represented, including prostate (19.9%), colorectal (17.9%), melanoma (14.8%), and others (47.4%). Median age was 65 with 59.2% patients being male and 40.85% female. All had at least one actionable polymorphism related to these medications. The most significant findings were related to CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes. Of 196 patients, a total of 132 (67.3%) had other than normal CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype and 112 (57.1%) had other than normal CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype. Based on these genotypes, alternatives to pain medications were recommended for 37 patients, to ondansetron in 9 patients, and to anti-depressants in 51 patients. Conclusions: Genetic variants were commonly found that affect supportive care medications used in oncology practice and contribute to inter-individual differences associated with increased risk of adverse drug effects and reduced efficacy. PGx guided recommendation may help physicians in individualizing medication treatment outcomes for patients with different cancer types and with polypharmacy. PGx trained pharmacist can serve as a valuable asset in optimizing personalized medication management.