Manchanda, Naveen

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of disorders comprising cutaneous mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis, and mast cell sarcoma. It is associated with a variety of symptoms related to the release of mast cell mediators and mast cell tissue infiltration. Referral to specialized centers with expertise in the management of mastocytosis and multidisciplinary collaboration with subspecialists (eg, allergists for the management of anaphylaxis and drug hypersensitivities, anesthesiologists for invasive procedures or surgery, high-risk obstetrician for pregnancy) is recommended. The NCCN Guidelines for Systemic Mastocytosis provide evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and comprehensive care of patients with systemic mastocytosis. The multidisciplinary panel of experts convenes at least once a year to review requested changes to the guidelines from both internal and external entities as well as to discuss data on existing and new therapies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the recent updates to the guidelines.

11006 Background: Interest in pursuing a career in oncology has decreased among internal medicine residents completing an inpatient oncology rotation. Over several years, our institutional data at Indiana University School of Medicine reflected lower resident satisfaction with the oncology inpatient ward rotation compared to other rotations. Methods: A hybrid model of inpatient consultations and outpatient clinics replaced the traditional inpatient oncology rotation at our institution. Over a six-month period preceding and following the change in format, residents completed anonymous rotation assessments and rated their experiences on a 5-point Likert scale (low 1 to high 5). Areas assessed included: patient load, educational value of patient mix, quality of didactics and teaching, quality of patient care delivery, adequacy of time for reading, and overall educational quality of the rotation. Results: The hybrid oncology rotation (8 respondents out of 10 residents approached) was rated as significantly superior to the traditional ward format (15 respondents out of 16 residents approached) in six out of eight areas. Improvements in the perceived quality of patient care delivery (p=0.139) and quality of didactics (p=0.058) were also observed without reaching statistical significance. The balance of inpatient and outpatient experiences with the hybrid rotation was highly rated (4.5 ± 0.5). Conclusions: The implementation of a hybrid oncology rotation was associated with perceived improvement in educational value, patient mix, and time for reflection and study without apparent compromise in the quality of patient care delivery. [Table: see text]