Suwanchinda, Atchima

AbstractObjectiveQuantifying the degree of dorsal hand atrophy is a challenging endeavor, but often necessary, in both the clinical and the research setting. The aim of this investigation was to create and consecutively validate a 5‐point photonumeric scale for assessment of dorsal hand atrophy.Material and MethodsA medical team created a novel 5‐point photonumeric scale. Twelve international raters were involved in the digital validation, while five raters performed a live validation.ResultsFor the digital validation of the Croma Hand Atrophy Assessment Scale, a total of 72 subjects (58 females, 14 males) with a mean age of 43.0 ± 14.4 years [18–73 years] were assessed. For the live validation, 88 subjects (73 females, 15 males) with a mean age of 45.0 ± 14.1 years [20–73 years] were rated. The results revealed almost perfect intra‐rater (ICC: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.88–0.92]) and inter‐rater agreements (ICC: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.81–0.89] and 0.86 [95% CI:0.82–0.89]) in the digital validation and substantial intra‐rater (ICC: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.75–0.82]) and inter‐rater agreements (ICC: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.68–0.81] and ICC: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.54–0.77]) in the live validation.ConclusionThe created scale to assess dorsal hand atrophy has been shown to provide substantial‐to‐almost perfect agreement in the digital and live validation cycles and reached comparable intra‐rater and inter‐rater agreement to already published and validated scales. It is expected that the created scale will help physicians and researchers in the assessment of hand atrophy in the clinical and research setting in the future.

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this investigation was to create and to examine the reproducibility and validity of 5‐point photonumeric assessment scales that allow objective assessment of chin retrusion and jawline sagging using a digital and a live validation.Material and methodsTwo new 5‐point photonumeric scales created to assess chin projection and jawline sagging were validated by 12 experts in a digital validation and by 5 experts in a live validation setting. Intra‐rater agreement and inter‐rater agreement were assessed.ResultsFor the digital validation, an almost perfect intra‐rater (Kappa: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.86–0.91]) and almost perfect inter‐rater agreement in both sessions (Kappa: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74–0.86] and 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74–0.86]) was achieved for the Croma Chin Projection Assessment Scale, while intra‐rater agreement (Kappa: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85–0.91]) was almost perfect for the Croma Jawline Sagging Assessment Scale and inter‐rater agreement being substantial in the first session (Kappa: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.71–0.81]) and almost perfect in the second session (Kappa: 0.81 [95%CI: 0.76–0.85]). For the live validation, intra‐rater agreement was almost perfect for the Croma Chin Projection Assessment Scale (Kappa: 0.82 [95%CI: 0.74–0.90]) and the Croma Jawline Sagging Assessment Scale (Kappa: 0.83 [95%CI: 0.77–0.89]), while inter‐rater agreement was substantial in both sessions for both scales.ConclusionThe created chin and jawline photonumeric grading scales are valid and reliable tools for assessing chin projection and jawline sagging. The scales will be of value for standardized chin evaluation and quantifying outcomes in clinical research and daily practice.

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this investigation was to create and validate 5‐point photonumeric scales for the assessment of dynamic crow's feet, static crow's feet, and infraorbital hollows.Material and methodsThree novel 5‐point photonumeric scales were created by a medical team. A total of 12 raters from all over the world performed a digital validation, and a total of 5 raters a live validation of the created scale.ResultsThe statistical analysis revealed almost perfect intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability in the digital validation of the scales for the assessment of static and dynamic crow's feet as well as infraorbital hollows. In the live validation, both crow's feet scales showed almost perfect intra‐rater reliability, while the Croma Infraorbital Hollow Assessment Scale showed substantial intra‐rater reliability. Inter‐rater reliability was substantial for all three scales in the live validation. All three scales, the Croma Dynamic Crow's Feet Assessment Scale, Croma Static Crow's Feet Assessment Scale, and Croma Infraorbital Hollow Assessment Scale, were validated digitally and in a live setting.ConclusionThe created scales to assess infraorbital hollowing, dynamic and static crow's feet have been shown to provide substantial to almost perfect agreement in the digital and live validation and can thus be considered as helpful tools in the clinical and research setting. While technical methods and appliances to assess the degrees of severity of age‐dependent features are advancing, validated scales are of great importance due to their ease of use and, as shown by the validations, reliability, and reproducibility.

AbstractObjectiveThe most promising facial region for inducing pan‐facial effects is the temporal region. The temple displays signs of facial aging itself which include temporal volume loss and increased visibility of the temporal crest, the temporal vasculature, the lateral orbital rim, and the upper zygomatic arch. The objective of this article is to provide a detailed review of temple anatomy pertaining to routinely performed temporal injection techniques, their expected esthetic outcomes as well as the intendant advantages, disadvantages, and procedure pearls.Materials and MethodsThis narrative review is based on the clinical experience of the authors treating the temporal region for esthetic purposes. The postulated outcome of each technique was observed during the routine clinical practice of the authors.ResultsThe temporal region is based on a bony platform consisting of the parietal, frontal, sphenoid, and temporal bones. The overlying soft tissues are arranged in layers which contain the temporal neurovascular structures. The temporal soft tissues consist of 10 parallel layers which vary in their thickness depending on age‐related influences. Six different techniques will be addressed, which include subdermal and interfascial techniques for volumizing, low and high supraperiosteal techniques for volumizing, and supraauricular and temporal lifting techniques.ConclusionThis narrative provides a detailed anatomic overview of the temporal region and describes each commonly performed injection technique with respect to anatomy, esthetic outcome, as well as potential pearls and pitfalls. It is hoped that the description contained herein may guide esthetic practitioners toward safer and more natural outcomes when treating the face.