Lin, David

Abstract Background Annually in the United States (US), an estimated 80–90,000 patients are diagnosed with acute pericarditis and 15–30% experience recurrent pericarditis (RP), resulting in increased morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Treatment options include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. Corticosteroids (CS) are often added to the treatment plan in RP despite CS-associated adverse events and inherent potentiation of recurrence with long-term treatment. A recent Phase 3 clinical trial RHAPSODY (NCT03737110) demonstrated efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin-1 α and β cytokine trap, in patients with RP. RHAPSODY data helped support FDA approval of the first therapy for RP. With the emergence of this targeted therapy, there is increased interest to learn more about this disease with the goal to better inform treatment and management decisions and improve long-term outcomes. Purpose RESONANCE Registry aims to evaluate the natural history of RP by collecting retrospective and prospective, longitudinal physician- and patient-reported outcomes data in real-world clinical practice across the US. Methods RP patients with active disease (recurrence within 3 years) will have both retrospective and prospective data collected (Figure 1) for as long as their RP is managed up to 5 years. For patients with inactive disease (no recurrence within 3 years), data collection will be retrospective (Figure 2). Up to 500 patients in the US are planned for enrollment at pediatric and adult medical centers, with the potential for expansion to European sites. Additionally, patients will be recruited through a novel, internet-based technology platform and screened for eligibility at a “decentralized” trial site. The registry will include variables obtained from health records, including baseline characteristics and medical history, as well as patient reported outcome (PRO) measures collected every 3 months. The RESONANCE protocol is designed to include a broad population of pediatric and adult patients, regardless of etiology or treatment course, including patients treated with rilonacept. Data will be analyzed to understand disease heterogeneity, variability in treatment and management, and impact on HRQoL. The protocol and Case Report Forms (CRFs) were developed in collaboration with physicians, patients, and patient advocates. Conclusions Registries utilize real-world data to fill knowledge gaps in the management of less common diseases such as RP. The RESONANCE Registry is the first RP registry designed to collect data across a broad range of patients regardless of treatment. The registry will also serve as a connection point for physicians to further educate and empower patients with information about their disease. In addition, PRO data may enable greater insights into the understanding of the burden of RP from the patient's perspective. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) patients report that painful, debilitating flares negatively impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RHAPSODY, the Phase 3 trial of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β cytokine trap), included a daily pain diary and patient-reported outcome SF-36v2 to measure HRQoL throughout the trial. Purpose The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effect of rilonacept on HRQoL in relation to changes in pain for RP patients who have a recurrence. Methods RHAPSODY enrolled 86 patients with acute symptomatic RP to receive weekly rilonacept for a 12-week run-in (RI) period and randomized 61 patients (1:1) to receive placebo (n=31) or continue rilonacept (n=30) for the event-driven randomized-withdrawal (RW) period. Patients on placebo who experienced a qualifying recurrence during RW (return of pericarditis pain and increase in C-reactive protein) were rescued with bailout rilonacept. Patients reported daily pericarditis pain electronically, using a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS), and completed the SF-36v2 at study visits prior to clinician interaction. Scores from RI Baseline (BL), RI Week 12 (RW BL), Recurrence visit, and RW up to Week 24 (or end of study; EOS) were evaluated for patients who experienced recurrence in RW. Analyses exclude one patient randomized to placebo who had a recurrence after Week 24 of the RW period. Results Analyses focused on the 22 of 30 patients (73%) in the placebo group who experienced a recurrence before Week 24 of RW (median time from RW BL to recurrence: 8.6 weeks). During RI, daily pain scores decreased while on rilonacept (Cohen's effect size [ES] d=−2.0), and SF-36v2 scores improved, with scores at RI BL (Fig. 1 red line) below the general population average of 50 and near or above average at RI Week 12 (Fig. 1 blue line); ES were all large (d>0.8), ranging from 0.917 (Mental Component Summary) to 2.021 (Bodily Pain). At recurrence, pain scores increased (d=6.5; Fig. 2) and SF-36v2 scores were below the population average (Fig. 1 orange line), with largest reductions between RI Week 12 (RW BL) and recurrence for Bodily Pain (−13.4) and Physical Component Summary (−10.6). Following rilonacept bailout, average pain decreased (d=−2.1; Fig. 2), and by RW Week 24/EOS, SF-36v2 scores returned to similar levels as at the end of the RI period (Fig. 1 green line). Conclusion Impaired RI BL SF-36v2 scores indicate negative impact of RP on HRQOL in RP patients. While receiving rilonacept, HRQoL scores improved to near or above population averages, in conjunction with patient-reported pain. After discontinuing rilonacept during RW, HRQoL scores worsened at recurrence and improved upon receipt of bail-out rilonacept, similar to pain. These results provide support for the broader benefit of rilonacept treatment beyond pain, when administered on top of conventional therapies and as mono-therapy, providing evidence of its potential to improve HRQoL in this patient population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Introduction: The magnitude of pericardial delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) illustrates the severity of inflammation in pericarditis. We report exploratory CMR data from an open-label Phase 2 study of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β inhibitor) in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Methods: Patients (pts) with idiopathic RP or post-pericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) enrolled in the study. A subset had CMR at baseline (BL) and final visit (FV, 6 mo). Pain (NRS) and inflammation (CRP) were also collected. CMR images were graded (none, mild, moderate, or severe DHE) by a central core lab blinded to clinical data. Results: Of 25 study pts, 11 had CMR at BL and FV; 6 active idiopathic RP, and 5 corticosteroid (CS)-dependent non-active RP (4 idiopathic, 1 PPS). At BL, DHE was severe (3), moderate (2), and none (1) in active RP pts and moderate (1) or mild/none (4) in CS-dependent pts (Figure 1). At FV, DHE was improved (2), resolved (2; one pt example in Figure C/D), or unchanged (2) in active RP pts and was improved (1), resolved (1), unchanged (2) or worsened from none to mild (1) in CS-dependent pts. DHE improvements were associated with decreased pain and CRP and occurred despite discontinuation of CS or reduction in dose level. One pt with severe DHE at baseline and mild DHE at FV experienced a recurrence ~8 weeks after rilonacept discontinuation and enrolled a second time with severe DHE; the patient had reduced CRP and pain NRS during both enrollments and ended the second enrollment with moderate DHE. Conclusions: Serial CMR demonstrated improvement in pericardial DHE after 6 mo of rilonacept treatment, consistent with clinical improvement, while corticosteroids were tapered/discontinued. Recurrence in one pt with incompletely resolved DHE after 6 months of rilonacept treatment could indicate that a longer treatment duration is warranted in patients with unresolved DHE. These preliminary results may inform future CMR-guided treatment studies in RP.

Background: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) episodes and conventional treatments result in morbidity, but the impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been quantified. The Phase 2 trial NCT03980522 of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β inhibitor) evaluated HRQoL. Methods: Patients with active RP who were symptomatic at Baseline (A-RP, n=16) and RP patients who were not currently experiencing a recurrence but were corticosteroid-dependent at Baseline (CSD-RP, n=9) were enrolled. All received rilonacept weekly for 6 weeks to end of base treatment period (TP) plus an optional 18-week extension treatment period (EP). Corticosteroid tapering occurred in the EP. Physical and mental HRQoL (PROMIS Global Health v1.2 Physical and Mental Component Scores [PCS/MCS]) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Results: Figure 1 presents the PROMIS PCS/MCS and pain scale scores (both patient-reported) as well as C-reactive protein levels over time. Mean PCS/MCS scores at baseline were 39.9/44.5 and 43.3/46.5 for A-RP and CSD-RP groups respectively (versus the norm mean of 50). In A-RP, PCS/MCS scores improved by 11.4/5.6 points by end of base TP, and this improvement was sustained throughout the EP (increase of 11.4/6.0 points from baseline at end of EP). In CSD-RP, PCS/MCS scores increased by 1.8/1.4 points by end of TP and improved by 3.5/4.2 points at end of study, after tapering or discontinuation of corticosteroid without disease recurrence. Conclusion: Impaired baseline HRQoL suggests negative impact of RP. For A-RP, rilonacept rapidly improved pericarditis signs and symptoms which was associated with HRQoL improvements. For CSD-RP, rilonacept supported tapering/withdrawal of corticosteroids without recurrence, with maintained/improved HRQoL. These results suggest rilonacept can improve RP patient HRQoL while providing an alternative to corticosteroids.