Peng, Zhiyong

Abstract BackgroundMany studies have evaluated bundled interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance (HHC). However, the compliance rates remain low. We aimed to use Kotter's change model (KCM) to improve HHC and conduct a complete process evaluation for HHC among medical staff in the intensive care unit (ICU). MethodsKCM was administrated in the ICU of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from March 2018 to August 2021, and 41-month longitudinal monitoring of HHC was carried out. The primary outcome was the absolute change in monthly HHC. The secondary outcomes included the characteristics of HHC in different phases, the different change trends of HHC for different HH opportunities and occupations, the quarterly incidence of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and the catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).Results. 20,222 HH actions and 24,195 HH opportunities were included in this study. The overall HHC was 83.58% (95%CI, 83.11%-84.04%). After implementing the KCM project, the HHC increased from 35.71% (95%CI, 22.99%-50.83%) to 87.75% (95%CI, 85.53%-89.67%), with an increased rate of 145.73%. The fastest-growing rate of HHC was after contact patients, which increased from 35.29% to 89.8%. Quarterly trends of the CLABSI rate (0‰-3.53‰) and CAUTI rate (0.96‰-4.26‰) remained stable at a low level under the background of the number of cases and the treatment complexities of the patients increasing year by year.ConclusionsUsing KCM can systematically change the cognition of HH in healthcare providers and create an atmosphere to promote HH to improve and maintain the stability of the HHC of healthcare providers in ICU.

Abstract BackgroundThe effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) on the COVID-19 remains controversial from clinic evidence. MethodsThis is a retrospective, two-center case series of 198 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension. ResultsAmong 198 patients, 58 (29.3%) and 16 (8.1%) were on were on ARB and ACEI, respectively. Patients who were on ARB or ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower rate of severe illness and ARDS when compared with patients treated with ACEI alone or not receiving and RAAS blocker (P＜0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with ARB in their antihypertensive regimen had a trend towards a higher survival rate when compared with individuals without ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-1.02; P = 0.054). The Cox-regression analysis to compared ACEI vs. ARB groups showed a significantly lower mortality rate in the ARB group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.58; P = 0.02). ConclusionsUsing of ARB was associated with a reduced rate of severe illness and ARDS, indicating their potential protective impact in COVID-19.

AIMS To report the major characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with ACE inhibitors and ARBs and compare the different effects of the two drugs for outcomes of COVID-19 patients. METHODS This is a retrospective, two-center case series of 198 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension. RESULTS Among 198 patients, 58 (29.3%) and 16 (8.1%) were on were on ARB and ACEI, respectively. Patients who were on ARB or ACEI/ARB had a significantly lower rate of severe illness and ARDS when compared with patients treated with ACEI alone or not receiving RAAS blocker (P＜0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with ARB in their antihypertensive regimen had a trend towards a higher survival rate when compared with individuals without ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-1.02; P=0.054). The occurrence rates of severe illness, ARDS, and death were similar in the two groups regardless of receiving ACEI. The Cox-regression analysis to compared ACEI vs. ARB groups showed a significantly lower mortality rate in the ARB group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.58; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our data may provide some evidence of using ARB, but not ACEI, was associated with a reduced rate of severe illness and ARDS, indicating their potential protective impact in COVID-19. Further large sample sizes and multiethnic populations are warranted to confirm our findings.