Back to Authors

Shaparin, Naum

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1060-429X

Mayo Clinic

Montefiore Medical Center

Citations 5

Use of Cryoneurolysis Therapy for the Management of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia
Gritsenko, Karina , Oh, Seung Mi , Zakirova, Mukhlisa , Ortiz, Nicole Rene, Raghavan, J., Koushik, Sarang , Viswanath, Omar, Ortiz, Nicole, Raghavan, Jagun, Viswanath, Omar , Shaparin, Naum

Orthopedic Reviews | April 14, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.52965/001c.158567 Get It

Introduction Trigeminal neuralgia is a debilitating facial pain condition characterized by recurrent, electric shock-like episodes within the trigeminal nerve distribution. While first-line treatment involves pharmacologic therapy, treatment options are limited for patients who are refractory or poor surgical candidates. Case Presentation We present a 75-year-old female with long-standing idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia refractory to combination anticonvulsant therapy and nerve block, with notable medication-related side effects. Management and Outcomes The patient underwent percutaneous cryoneurolysis targeting the maxillary (V2) and mandibular (V3) divisions of the trigeminal nerve under fluoroscopic guidance. She experienced immediate pain reduction and complete symptom resolution at a one-month follow-up with no complications. Conclusion This case highlights percutaneous cryoneurolysis as a minimally invasive treatment option for selected patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia who are not candidates for open surgical intervention.
Craniofacial Hypoplasia and the Difficult Airway
Huynh, Kathleen, Gritsenko, Karina, Breidenbach, Kathryn, Diaz, Steven, Sterling, Felix Dailey, Koushik, Sarang , Viswanath, Omar, Borowski, Blaze, Lee, Kay , Huynh, Kathleen, Gritsenko, Karina , Breidenbach, Kathryn A., Viswanath, Omar , Shaparin, Naum

Orthopedic Reviews | February 19, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.52965/001c.157900 Get It

Introduction Craniofacial hyperplasia is a disorder where the face and head do not fully develop. This leads to difficulties in airway management in those undergoing general anesthesia (GA), requiring consideration in anesthetic planning with GA and intubation versus approaches with regional/spinal anesthesia. Case Presentation A 54-year-old male (45 kg, 172.7 cm) presented for a penile implant insertion for severe erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. He was classified as ASA physical status class III. Management and Outcomes Pertinent medical history included craniofacial hypoplasia from childhood surgical interventions and radiation for sinus cancer (rhabdomyosarcoma), moderate mitral regurgitation, mild tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension, recurrent esophageal strictures, and anemia. Spinal anesthesia was selected over GA. Airway complications were avoided, and cardiopulmonary stability was preserved while maintaining adequate analgesic coverage. Conclusion Craniofacial hypoplasia patients require individualized anesthesia planning that anticipates complications. Spinal anesthesia can be used in these patients to avoid airway and hemodynamic complications.
Developing innovative teaching strategies for pain medicine rotations tailored to Generation Z
Banik, Ratan K. , Sandozi, Heba , Bhullar, Sona, Wang, Eric J. , Chai, Thomas , Cheng, Jianguo , Hagedorn, Jonathan M. , Wahezi, Sayed , Kohan, Lynn , Akhtaruzzaman, AKM , Ibrahim, Mohab , Mendelson, Andrew , Hussain, Nasir , Wang, Eric , Hagedorn, Jonathan M , Kohan, Lynn R , Mendelson, Andrew M , Hussain, Nasir , Banik, Ratan K , Bhullar, Sona, Shaparin, Naum , Singh, Ambrish

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | February 3, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: rapm-2024-106297

10.1136/rapm-2024-106297 Get It

The current state of training in pain medicine fellowships: An Association of Pain Program Directors ( APPD ) survey of program directors
Wahezi, Sayed , Caparó, Moorice , Choi, Heejung , Eshraghi, Yashar , Naeimi, Tahereh , Kohan, Lynn , Anițescu, Magdalena , Wright, Thelma , Przkora, Rene , Patel, Kiran V., Lamer, Tim J. , Moeschler, Susan M. , Yener, Ugur , Alerte, Jonathan, Grandhe, Radhika, Bautista, Alexander , Spektor, Boris , Noon, Kristen , Reddy, Rajiv , Osuagwu, Uzondu, Carpenter, A. Alden, Gerges, Frederic J., Murphy, Casey, Kim, Chong , Marshall, Cameron, Kirchen, Gwynne, Oryhan, Christine , Singh, Tejinder S. Swaran, Lubenow, Timothy R. , Sehgal, Nalini , Argoff, Charles E. , Gulati, Amit , Day, Miles, Sibai, Nabil, Dua, Anterpreet, Barad, Meredith , Singh, Tarun D. , Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi , Emerick, Trent D , Naeimi, Tahereh , Moeschler, Susan, Yener, Ugur , Bautista, Alexander , Reddy, Rajiv , Barad, Meredith J , Horn, Danielle Bodzin , Pritzlaff, Scott , Marshall, Cameron, Singh, Tejinder S. Swaran, Sayed, Dawood , Shaparin, Naum

Pain Practice | March 30, 2024 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 895-903

10.1111/papr.13373 Get It

Abstract Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved the first pain medicine fellowship programs over three decades ago, designed around a pharmacological philosophy. Following that, there has been a rise in the transition of pain medicine education toward a multidisciplinary interventional model based on a tremendous surge of contemporaneous literature in these areas. This trend has created variability in clinical experience and education amongst accredited pain medicine programs with minimal literature evaluating the differences and commonalities in education and experience of different pain medicine fellowships through Program Director (PD) experiences. This study aims to gather insight from pain medicine fellowship program directors across the country to assess clinical and interventional training, providing valuable perspectives on the future of pain medicine education. Methods This study involved 56 PDs of ACGME‐accredited pain fellowship programs in the United States. The recruitment process included three phases: advanced notification, invitation, and follow‐up to maximize response rate. Participants completed a standard online questionnaire, covering various topics such as subcategory fields, online platforms for supplemental education, clinical experience, postgraduate practice success, and training adequacy. Results Surveys were completed by 39/56 (69%) standing members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). All PDs allowed fellows to participate in industry‐related and professional society‐related procedural workshops, with 59% encouraging these workshops. PDs emphasized the importance of integrity, professionalism, and diligence for long‐term success. Fifty‐four percent of PDs expressed the need for extension of fellowship training to avoid supplemental education by industry or pain/spine societies. Conclusion This study highlights the challenge of providing adequate training in all Pain Medicine subtopics within a 12‐month pain medicine fellowship. PDs suggest the need for additional training for fellows and discuss the importance of curriculum standardization.
Maintaining High-Quality Multidisciplinary Pain Medicine Fellowship Programs: Part II: Innovations in Clinical Care Workflow, Clinical Supervision, Job Satisfaction, and Postgraduation Mentorship for Pain Fellows During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Kohan, Lynn , Sobey, Christopher M., Wahezi, Sayed , Brancolini, Scott, Przkora, Rene , Shaparin, Naum , Spektor, Boris , Moeschler, Susan M. , Anițescu, Magdalena , Moeschler, Susan

Pain Medicine | May 1, 2020 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1718-1728

10.1093/pm/pnaa176 Get It

Abstract Background Pain fellowship programs are facing unique challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions by state governments and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have resulted in a rapidly changing and evolving learning environment for today’s fellows. Innovative solutions must be sought to maintain proper education and ensure the well-being of our trainees. Methods We assembled a panel of pain program directors who serve as officers/board members of the Association of Pain Program Directors, offering guidance and recommendations to pain fellowship directors nationwide. Panel members evaluate the best available evidence and expert opinion on use of remote and virtual platforms in clinical care, adaptability to alterations in clinic and referral management, and provide guidance on postgraduate impact. Conclusions The country is in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic. The impact on pain management fellowships has been significant and will likely last for months, resulting in extraordinary challenges to the administration of pain fellowship programs and the education of our fellows. Several strategies will help address these challenges, including employing telehealth capabilities to continue clinical experiences and providing trainees with opportunities to continue their professional growth beyond fellowship completion. Together, we can implement innovative solutions to overcome these challenges.