Desai, Aakash

Abstract Background Metformin exerts anti-inflammatory properties through a positive effect on oxidative stress, gut barrier integrity, and the gut microbiota. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of metformin on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database in patients with IBD and T2DM who initiated metformin vs oral hypoglycemics or insulin (control cohort) between August 31, 2002, and August 31, 2022. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Primary outcomes were need for intravenous (IV) steroid use or IBD-related surgery within 1, 2, and 3 years after metformin initiation. Results Our cohorts included 1323 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (mean age 58.7 ± 12.2 years, 50.1% female, 77.3% White) and 1278 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (mean age 56.3 ± 12.6 years, 58.2% female, 76.5% White). At 1 year, patients with UC and CD were less likely to require IV steroids (UC: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.59; P < .01; CD: aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.85; P < .01). The decreased need for IV steroids persisted in all metformin groups at 2 and 3 years. Patients with CD were at a lower risk for IBD-related surgery at year 1 (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81; P < .01), and this finding persisted at 3 years (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89; P < .01). Metformin did not affect risk for surgery in patients with UC. Conclusions Patients with IBD and T2DM on metformin had a decreased likelihood of worse IBD outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: There are limited real-world data comparing the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database, to compare the effectiveness of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in patients with UC. The primary aim was to assess the risk of a composite outcome of hospitalization requiring intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 and 12 months. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, mean hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, and calprotectin, and prior UC medications including recent oral or intravenous steroid use between the cohorts. Risk was expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 526 patients in the upadacitinib cohort (mean age 40.4 ± 16.3, 44.8% female sex, 76.6% White race) and 1,149 patients in the tofacitinib cohort (mean age 42 ± 17.1, 41.9% female sex, 76% White race). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome of need for intravenous steroids and/or colectomy within 6 months (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49–1.09). However, there was a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44–0.89) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months. There was no difference in the risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48–1.02) but lower risk of colectomy (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27–0.79). In sensitivity analysis, there was also a lower risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94), including lower risk of intravenous steroid use (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99) and colectomy (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.92) in the upadacitinib cohort compared with the tofacitinib cohort within 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study utilizing real-world data showed that upadacitinib was associated with improved disease-specific outcomes at 12 months compared with tofacitinib in patients with UC.

Summary Background Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RA) show anti‐inflammatory properties. Aim To evaluate their clinical impact on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outcomes. Methods Retrospective cohort study utilising the TriNetX database comparing IBD‐specific outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on GLP‐1RA compared to oral hypoglycaemic agents. The primary outcome was hospitalisation requiring intravenous steroids and IBD‐related surgery within 3 years. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for demographics, co‐morbid conditions, BMI, laboratory values, HbA1c, and IBD medications including steroids. Results We identified 1130 patients in the UC GLP‐1RA cohort (mean age: 58.9 ± 11.6 years, 56.3% female, 70.2% White, 57.2% with obesity) and 1140 patients in the CD GLP‐1RA cohort (mean age: 56.7 ± 11.5, 61.9% female, 73.6% White, 56.2% with obesity). After PSM, there was no difference in the risk of intravenous steroid use (aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.92–1.59) but a lower risk of colectomy (aHR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14–0.97) between the UC GLP‐1RA and control cohort. There was no difference in the risk of intravenous steroid use (aHR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.80–1.34) but a lower risk of surgery (aHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36–0.84) between the CD GLP‐1RA and CD control cohort. There was no difference in the risk of oral steroid use or advanced therapy initiation in the UC and CD GLP‐1RA than control cohorts. Conclusions We found an association between lower risk of IBD‐related surgery and GLP‐1RA use for T2DM in patients with UC or CD.