Citations 2

Sulfatase 2 (SULF2) Monoclonal Antibody 5D5 Suppresses Human Cholangiocarcinoma Xenograft Growth Through Regulation of a SULF2–Platelet‐Derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta–Yes‐Associated Protein Signaling Axis
Campbell, Nellie A. , O’Brien, Daniel R. , Singer, Mark S., Lemjabbar‐Alaoui, Hassan, Ahn, Keun Soo , Smoot, Rory L. , Rosen, Steven D. , Roberts, Lewis R. , Luo, Xin , He, Li , O'Brien, Daniel R, Roberts, Lewis R , Smoot, Rory L , Campbell, Nellie A , Luo, Xin , He, Li , Torbenson, Michael

Hepatology | March 18, 2021 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1411-1428

10.1002/hep.31817 Get It

Background and Aims Existing therapeutic approaches to treat cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have limited effectiveness, prompting further study to develop therapies for CCA. We report a mechanistic role for the heparan sulfate editing enzyme sulfatase 2 (SULF2) in CCA pathogenesis. Approach and Results In silico analysis revealed elevated SULF2 expression in human CCA samples, occurring partly through gain of SULF2 copy number. We examined the effects of knockdown or overexpression of SULF2 on tumor growth, chemoresistance, and signaling pathway activity in human CCA cell lines in vitro. Up‐regulation of SULF2 in CCA leads to increased platelet‐derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ)–Yes‐associated protein (YAP) signaling activity, promoting tumor growth and chemotherapy resistance. To explore the utility of targeting SULF2 in the tumor microenvironment for CCA treatment, we tested an anti‐SULF2 mouse monoclonal antibody, 5D5, in a mouse CCA xenograft model. Targeting SULF2 by monoclonal antibody 5D5 inhibited PDGFRβ–YAP signaling and tumor growth in the mouse xenograft model. Conclusions These results suggest that SULF2 monoclonal antibody 5D5 or related agents may be potentially promising therapeutic agents in CCA.
Circulating Extracellular Vesicles Carrying Sphingolipid Cargo for the Diagnosis and Dynamic Risk Profiling of Alcoholic Hepatitis
Sehrawat, Tejasav S. , Liu, Mengfei , Amrollahi, Pouya , Wan, Meihua , Fan, Jia , Nakao, Yasuhiko , Pose, Elisa , Navarro‐Corcuera, Amaia , Dasgupta, Debanjali , Liao, Chieh‐Yu , He, Li , Mauer, Amy S. , Avitabile, Emma , Ventura‐Cots, Meritxell , Chalasani, Naga P., Watt, Kymberly D. , Kamath, Patrick S. , Simonetto, Douglas A. , Hu, Tony , Shah, Vijay H. , Amrollahi, Pouya , Navarro-Corcuera, Amaia, Bataller, Ramon A , Gines, Pere , Malhi, Harmeet , Sehrawat, Tejasav S , Simonetto, Douglas A , Ventura Cots, Meritxell , Nakao, Yasuhiko , Dasgupta, Debanjali , Arab, Juan Pablo , Sanyal, Arun J. , Heimbach, Julie K. , Gores, Gregory J. , Ginès, Pere , Malhi, Harmeet

Hepatology | April 4, 2020 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 571-585

10.1002/hep.31256 Get It

Background and Aims Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is diagnosed by clinical criteria, although several objective scores facilitate risk stratification. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as biomarkers for many diseases and are also implicated in the pathogenesis of AH. Therefore, we investigated whether plasma EV concentration and sphingolipid cargo could serve as diagnostic biomarkers for AH and inform prognosis to permit dynamic risk profiling of AH subjects. Approach and Results EVs were isolated and quantified from plasma samples from healthy controls, heavy drinkers, and subjects with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) attributed to cholestatic liver diseases and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, decompensated alcohol‐associated cirrhosis (AC), and AH. Sphingolipids were quantified by tandem mass spectroscopy. The median plasma EV concentration was significantly higher in AH subjects (5.38 × 1011/mL) compared to healthy controls (4.38 × 1010/mL; P < 0.0001), heavy drinkers (1.28 × 1011/mL; P < 0.0001), ESLD (5.35 × 1010/mL; P < 0.0001), and decompensated AC (9.2 × 1010/mL; P < 0.0001) disease controls. Among AH subjects, EV concentration correlated with Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score. When EV counts were dichotomized at the median, survival probability for AH subjects at 90 days was 63.0% in the high‐EV group and 90.0% in the low‐EV group (log‐rank P value = 0.015). Interestingly, EV sphingolipid cargo was significantly enriched in AH when compared to healthy controls, heavy drinkers, ESLD, and decompensated AC (P = 0.0001). Multiple sphingolipids demonstrated good diagnostic and prognostic performance as biomarkers for AH. Conclusions Circulating EV concentration and sphingolipid cargo signature can be used in the diagnosis and differentiation of AH from heavy drinkers, decompensated AC, and other etiologies of ESLD and predict 90‐day survival permitting dynamic risk profiling.