Choong, Grace M.

513 Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor (HR) positive early-stage breast cancer (BC). For pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-low BC (defined as ER 1-10%), there is controversy regarding AET benefit, given tumor heterogeneity (>40% basal; (1)), and similar chemotherapy response and prognosis to ER-negative (neg) BC. Current guidelines categorize ER-low BC as a separate entity and suggest equipoise regarding AET benefit. We previously determined that AET omission in chemotherapy-treated pts with ER+ BC resulted in a nearly 2-fold increase in death (2). However, the impact of AET omission in patients with ER-low BC is unknown. Methods: Beginning in 2018, the National Cancer Database (NCDB) began to abstract ER as a continuous variable, allowing classification of ER+ tumors as 1-10% or >10%. Therefore, we queried the NCDB 2018-2020 for patients with stage I-III ER+BC treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, as these pts have the highest risk of recurrence. ER was assessed as ER-neg (0%), low (1-10%) and ER >10%. OS was analyzed with AET as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 357,085 pts with stage I-III ER+BC were identified, with 10,396 (3%) classified as ER-low. Among pts with ER-low disease, 69% had PR-neg BC and 67% had HER2-neg BC. The majority (77%) were treated with chemotherapy (32% neoadjuvant, 44% adjuvant, 1% unknown timing) and formed our analysis cohort. Among these 7,956 pts, AET was omitted in 3,233 (41%). AET omission was more common for pts with tumors that were PR-neg vs positive (46% vs 30%, p<0.001), HER2-neg vs positive (44% vs 37%, p<0.001), and Ki67≥20% (44% vs 35%, p<0.001). With median follow-up of 3 years, 648 deaths were observed. OS was 94.3% (95% CI: 93.8-94.9%) at 2 years and 87.6% (95% CI: 86.5-88.7%) at 4 years. In unadjusted analysis, omission of AET was associated with worse OS (HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19-1.65, p<0.001), with similar effects regardless of PR, HER2, or Ki67 (each interaction test p>0.3). When controlling for age, comorbidity score, year of diagnosis, PR, HER2, and pathologic stage, the adjusted effect of AET omission on OS was HR 1.22 (95% CI: 1.00-1.48, p=0.05). Given assessment of OS was performed during pandemic years, with 1/3 of deaths occurring during the first year of follow-up, we performed a sensitivity analysis to analyze pts who survived to one year after definitive surgery. In this analysis, the adjusted effect of AET omission on OS was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.02-1.51, p=0.03). Conclusions: Omission of AET in pts treated with chemotherapy for ER-low, early-stage BC is associated with significantly worse OS. These data strongly suggest that pts with ER low BC should be counseled regarding the benefit of AET and practice guidelines should recommend AET in this setting. 1. Benefield JNCI 2020. 2. Choong SABCS 2022.

Abstract Background: Germline Pathogenic Variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 are known to increase breast cancer (BCa) risk, but the effect of these PVs on tumor biology is not well-understood. Ki-67 is an established prognostic marker in hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer but the distribution of Ki-67 in breast cancer associated with germline PVs is not known. Methods: The study included patients with loco-regional (Stage I-III) HR-positive (ER+ or PR+), HER2-negative invasive ductal or lobular breast cancer evaluated at Mayo Clinic for curative intent treatment between 2012 and 2021. PV carrier status was ascertained in more than two-thirds of cases from germline whole exome sequencing (Regeneron) of patients who participated in a prospective registry at Mayo Clinic. Additional PV carriers were identified through a review of the results of clinical germline genetic testing in electronic medical records aided by natural language processing. Clinically performed Ki-67 values were abstracted from electronic medical records and analyzed as continuous and categorical variables (low: &lt; 20% vs. high: ≥20%). Throughout the timeline of the study, a consistent method for assessment of Ki-67 was utilized at Mayo Clinic, Rochester: Immunohistochemical staining of the Ki-67 antigen in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was performed using MIB-1 clone, the scanned slides were reviewed by a technologist and traced areas further analyzed for Ki-67 using Aperio Software. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy prior to the assessment of Ki-67, with metastatic disease at diagnosis, with PVs in two or more genes of interest, or unknown germline PV or Ki-67 status were excluded from the analysis. Multiple primary tumors in the same patient diagnosed within one year of each other were analyzed independently. The control (non-carrier) group included randomly selected patients from the prospective registry who tested negative for PVs in the five genes over the same time period. Ki-67 values were compared between germline PV carriers and non-carriers in a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for sex, race, age at diagnosis, stage at presentation, and histology of the tumor. Results: A total of 113 HR+/HER2- tumors from 111 PV carriers (ATM: 27, BRCA1: 24, BRCA2: 28, CHEK2: 22, and PALB2:12) along with 431 HR+/HER2- tumors from 422 randomly selected non-carriers were evaluated. The majority (&gt;95%) of patients were non-Hispanic White. Germline PV carriers in each gene were diagnosed at a significantly younger age (P&lt; 0.05) compared to non-carriers. The median Ki-67 value was 12 (Range: 1 to 93) for non-carriers, 16 (Range: 0 to 79) for ATM, 31 (Range: 4 to 86) for BRCA1, 30 (Range: 6 to 80) for BRCA2, 13 (Range: 1 to 38) for CHEK2, and 20 (Range: 3 to 46) for PALB2 PV carriers. In multivariable analysis, compared to non-carriers, we observed significantly higher odds of a high Ki67 value (≥20%) for tumors arising from germline PV carriers in BRCA1 (Odds Ratio (OR): 7.3, 95%CI: 2.3 – 23.3, p&lt; 0.001), BRCA2 (OR: 3.0, 95%CI: 1.2 – 7.4, p=0.02) and PALB2 (OR: 3.9, 95%CI: 1.1 – 14.5, p=0.04). No such relationship was observed with either ATM (OR: 1.1, 95%CI: 0.4 – 2.9, p=0.81) or CHEK2 (OR: 0.8, 95%CI: 0.3 – 2.2, p=0.63). Conclusion: This study reveals that HR+/HER2- tumors in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PV carriers have a significantly higher Ki-67 expression compared to non-carriers. These findings have implications for understanding prognosis and endocrine response PV with HR+ breast cancer. Further exploration of the relationships between Ki67 and germline PV status is necessary to personalize systemic therapy options in germline PV carriers. Acknowledgments: Thank you to Regeneron Genetics Center. The study was funded in part by the NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Breast Cancer [P50CA116201] to Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Department of Oncology Small Grants Program, and the Paul Calabresi Program at Mayo Clinic Citation Format: Robert Scheel, Grace Choong, Tara Rao, Nicholas Boddicker, Chunling Hu, Jie Na, Vinod Kaggal, Sean Murphy, Karthik Giridhar, Saba Yasir, Matthew Goetz, Fergus Couch, Siddhartha Yadav. Ki-67 Expression in Breast Cancer associated with ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-08-07.

Background: Bimiralisib is a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor demonstrating antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. The objectives of this study were to identify a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), a dosing schedule, and adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients received oral bimiralisib to determine the MTD of one continuous (once daily) and two intermittent schedules (A: Days 1, 2 weekly; B: Days 1, 4 weekly) until progression or unacceptable AEs occurred. Results: The MTD for the continuous schedule was 80 mg, with grade three fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). No MTD was reached with intermittent schedules, with only one DLT in schedule B. PK analysis suggested that 140 mg (schedule A) was within the biologically active dose range and was selected for further exploration. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were hyperglycemia (76.2%) in the continuous schedule, and nausea (56–62.5%) in schedules A and B. The most frequent treatment-emergent > grade three AE for all schedules combined was hyperglycemia (28.6%, continuous schedule; 12.0%, schedule A; 12.5%, schedule B). There was one partial response in a head and neck squamous cancer patient with a NOTCH1T1997M mutation. Conclusions: Bimiralisib demonstrated a manageable AE profile consistent with this compound class. Intermittent schedules had fewer > grade three AEs, while also maintaining favorable PK profiles. Intermittent schedule A is proposed for further development in biomarker-selected patient populations.

Abstract Purpose: Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. Methods: Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p=0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p<0.001). Conclusion: Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.

Abstract Background: HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is a rare entity. Treatment decisions for HER2-positive lobular breast cancer are often extrapolated from the HER2-positive ductal subtype of breast cancer but the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well defined. Methodology: Women with a diagnosis of stage I to III HER2-positive ILC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Baseline characteristics were compared between ILC and IDC using Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Five-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan Meir method. Multivariate cox proportional hazards regression model including age, race, ethnicity, Charleston Deyo score, grade, TNM stage, and treatment modalities such as type of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation was used to identify factors associated with OS in HER2-positive ILC. In a subset of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the odds of achieving a complete pathological response were compared between women with ILC and IDC in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, Charleston Deyo score, grade, and clinical stage. Results: A total of 4,197 women with HER2-positive ILC and 116,984 women with HER2-positive IDC were included in the final analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years for women with HER2-positive ILC and 56 years for women with HER2-positive IDC (p&lt; 0.001). The five-year OS among women with HER2-positive ILC was 93.1%, 90.8%,and 78.8% in TNM stages I, II, and III respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant difference in difference in overall survival was not observed between women with HER2 positive ILC and IDC (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.0, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.9 - 1.1, p=0.55). Among women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a complete pathological response was observed in 31.7% of women with HER2-positive ILC and 42.7% of HER2-positive IDC. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in odds of achieving a complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between HER2-positive ILC and IDC (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.8, 95%CI: 0.7 - 1.0, p=0.12). Higher odds of complete pathological response in HER2-positive ILC were observed for women with estrogen-receptor negative (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1- 3.8), p= 0.02) and progesterone-receptor negative (OR 2.4, 95%CI: 1.5- 3.7), p&lt; 0.001) tumors. The five-year OS for women with a complete pathological response, partial response, and no response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive ILC were 89.6%, 84.9%, and 77.3% respectively (p=0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that HER2-positive ILC has comparable clinical outcomes to HER2-positive IDC and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlates with OS in HER2-positive ILC. These findings lend support to the current practice of treating HER2-positive ILC and IDC in a similar manner. Citation Format: Suman Gaire, Pravash Budhathoki, Utsav Joshi, Anish Shah, Grace M. Choong, Siddhartha Yadav. Clinical outcomes of loco-regional HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-04.

Abstract Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in ER+ breast cancer (BC) reduces local, distant, and contralateral BC events and improves overall survival (OS). Furthermore, decreased adherence or omission of ET increases the risk of death. However, in ER+ pts with early-stage BC treated with NAC who have a pathologic complete response (pCR), the importance of adjuvant ET may be called into question. We sought to examine the impact of ET omission on the survival of pts with ER+ BC treated with NAC, according to pCR vs residual disease. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2010-2018 for female pts with stage I-III ER+ BC treated with NAC followed by surgery. pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis, ypN0. The percent receiving adjuvant ET and the impact of adjuvant ET omission on overall survival (OS) in patients with and without pCR were assessed separately based on HER2 expression. OS was analyzed with adjuvant ET as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: We identified 34,394 pts treated with NAC for ER+ BC (28,434 ER+/HER2-, 5960 ER+/HER2+). Pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than pts with ER+/HER2- BC to have received adjuvant ET (61.6% vs 88.8%, p&lt; 0.001). Overall, 4505 (13.1%) had pCR (9.1% of ER+/HER2- and 32.0% of ER+/HER2+). Within each subtype, pts with pCR were significantly less likely to start adjuvant ET after surgery than pts with residual disease (78.4% vs 89.8% for ER+/HER2- and 46.5% vs 68.7% for ER+/HER2+, each p&lt; 0.001), Table 1. Regarding those with residual disease, pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than ER+/HER2- BC to receive adjuvant ET (68.7% vs 89.8%, p&lt; 0.001). Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Among pts with pCR, 5-year OS was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.1-94.4%) for ER+/HER2- BC and 94.3% (95% CI: 93.1-95.5%) for ER+/HER2+ BC (p=0.08), while among patients with residual disease 5-year OS was 81.7% (95% CI: 81.1-82.2%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 84.5-86.9%) for the two subtypes respectively (p&lt; 0.001). On multivariable analysis, omission of adjuvant ET was significantly associated with poorer OS in patients with residual disease for both ER+/HER2- BC (adjusted HR 1.72, p&lt; 0.001) and ER+/HER2+ BC (adjusted HR 1.63, p&lt; 0.001). In contrast, omission of adjuvant ET was not significantly associated with OS in patients with pCR, regardless of HER2 status (ER+/HER2- adjusted HR 1.28, p=0.20; ER+/HER2+ adjusted HR 1.13, p=0.54), Table 1. Conclusions: In pts receiving NAC for ER+ BC, those with ER+/HER2+ disease were less likely to have received adjuvant ET compared to ER+/HER2- patients, regardless of pCR. In pts with residual disease after NAC, omission of adjuvant ET was associated with significantly higher risk of death. These data provide strong support for interventions to increase utilization of ET, especially for patients with residual disease following NAC. The observation that ET omission did not impact OS in pts with ER+ BC who achieve pCR following NAC is hypothesis generating and may have implications for future de-escalation trials for this subset of patients. Table 1. Differential use of adjuvant endocrine therapy by subtype and pCR and the impact on overall survival Citation Format: Grace M. Choong, Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Matthew P. Goetz. Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) omission in ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-12.

555 Background: Women with early-stage breast cancer (BCa) are living longer, and survivorship issues including second primary cancers (SPCs) are therefore increasingly important. This study seeks to determine the risk of SPCs, including contralateral breast cancer (CBCa), in women with early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Methods: The study population consisted of women with BCa diagnosis between 2000-2018 within the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER v 3.2.9) registry and between 2000-2021 in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry. In the SEER registry, the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPCs were estimated for adult women with histologically confirmed early stage (I-III) ILC compared to the development of any primary cancer in the general population. For reference, SIRs for SPCs for a similar patient population with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast were also estimated. For comparison of CBCa between ILC and IDC, follow up records from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry were evaluated among adult women who underwent lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy for early stage ILC or IDC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to compare the risk of CBCa between ILC and IDC while adjusting for the age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status of the primary tumor. Results: An increased incidence (p<0.05) of any SPCs and second BCa was noted for both ILC and IDC compared to the expected rate of primary cancer in the general population (Table). Interestingly, women with ILC were observed to have a significantly increased incidence of subsequent gastric cancer which was not seen for women with IDC. An SIR >1.5 was noted for subsequent risk of sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for both ILC and IDC (Table). In the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry of 2,218 women with ILC and 14,629 women with IDC meeting the inclusion criteria, the 5-year risk of CBCa was 2.6% and 1.5% (log rank statistic p-value =0.001) for ILC and IDC respectively. A significantly increased risk of CBCa was noted in women with ILC (Hazard Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.47, p<0.001) compared to women with IDC in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Women with ILC may have an increased risk of SPC and second BCa compared to the risk of any primary cancer in the general population. The increased incidence of gastric cancer and the higher risk of CBCa in ILC survivors compared to women with IDC is intriguing and needs to be investigated further including evaluation of the role of germline genetic factors. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose Cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard either in the first (1L) or second line (2L) setting for the treatment of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal sequencing of treatments after progression on CDK4/6i remains unknown. We performed a single institution analysis to identify treatments and outcomes after progression on a CDK4/6i. Methods We identified patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC prescribed a CDK4/6i in the 1L or 2L settings from December 2014-February 2018 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Outcomes were collected through September 30, 2020. Results Palbociclib, in combination with letrozole or fulvestrant, was the most prescribed CDK4/6i. The 1L and 2L CDK4/6i cohorts exhibited comparable overall survival (OS), but progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the 1L than the 2L cohort [28.2 months (95% CI 19.6–34.9) vs 19.8 months (95% CI 15.7–29.6)]. The most common post-CDK4/6i treatments were PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (PI3K/mTORi), single agent ET, or chemotherapy. PFS in the 1L CDK4/6i cohort following PI3K/mTORi was 8.5 months (95% CI 5.5 months – NE), single-agent ET was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.3–14.0 months), and chemotherapy PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI 3.3 months- NE). Conclusions Following progression on a CDK 4/6i, mPFS was short, with similar PFS times comparing chemotherapy and ET, with slightly longer PFS for targeted strategies (PI3K/mTOR). These results highlight a major need to better understand the mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance and identify new therapeutic strategies for these patients.

Abstract The management of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved over the last 20 years. Major advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of 7 HER2‐targeted therapies for the treatment of early‐stage and/or advanced‐stage disease. Although oncologic outcomes continue to improve, most patients with advanced HER2‐positive BC ultimately die of their disease because of primary or acquired resistance to therapy, and patients with HER2‐positive early BC who have residual invasive disease after preoperative systemic therapy are at a higher risk of distant recurrence and death. The concept of treatment de‐escalation and escalation is increasingly important to optimally tailor therapy for patients with HER2‐positive BC and is a major focus of the current review. Research efforts in this regard are discussed as well as updates regarding the evolving standard of care in the (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, including the use of novel combination therapies. The authors also briefly discuss ongoing challenges in the management of HER2‐positive BC (eg, intrinsic vs acquired drug resistance, the identification of predictive biomarkers, the integration of imaging techniques to guide clinical practice), and the treatment of HER2‐positive brain metastases. Research aimed at superseding these challenges will be imperative to ensure continued progress in the management of HER2‐positive BC going forward.