Emmenegger, Urban

155 Background: Primary results from the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 TRITON3 (NCT02975934) study of rucaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC and BRCA1/2 (BRCA) vs the control arm of physician’s choice of DTX or ARPI (abiraterone acetate [ABI] or enzalutamide [ENZ]) demonstrated that rucaparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS, primary efficacy endpoint) vs physician’s choice. Here, we report final OS and safety results from TRITON3. Methods: Patients with disease progression after 1 prior second-generation ARPI in any setting were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib 600 mg BID or physician’s choice of DTX, ABI, or ENZ (control). OS was a key secondary endpoint tested initially in the BRCA subgroup, followed by the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in an ordered step-down multiple-comparisons procedure. Crossover from placebo to rucaparib was allowed after radiographic progression was confirmed by independent radiology review. Results: As of March 1, 2024 (final analysis data cutoff),patients with BRCA (N = 302) and ATM (N = 103) alterations were randomized (ITT, N = 405). After an overall median follow-up of 44.0 months, median OS in the BRCA subgroup in the rucaparib arm was 23.2 months vs 21.2 months for the physician’s choice control arm (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.68–1.20]; P = 0.5044; Table). Hierarchical testing did not continue due to lack of statistical significance. No OS benefit was observed in the ITT population or ATM subgroup (Table). Median duration of treatment in rucaparib and physician’s choice arms was 8.3 and 5.1 months, respectively. The most frequent any-grade treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) in the rucaparib (n = 270) and physician’s choice (n = 130) arms was asthenia/fatigue (61.5% and 63.1%, respectively). The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAE was anemia (23.7%) with rucaparib, and asthenia/fatigue (9.2%) with physician’s choice. Of the 135 patients in the physician’s choice arm, 77 patients had radiographic progression and 70 crossed over to rucaparib. Conclusions: Rucaparib remains the only PARPi to show improved rPFS vs a DTX-containing control arm and has a similar OS even when most patients cross over to rucaparib. Safety was consistent with prior reports. These data support rucaparib as a treatment option for patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934 . Median OS at final analysis. Group Rucaparib, n Physician's choice, n Rucaparib, months Physician's choice, months HR (95% CI) a BRCA 201 101 23.2 21.2 0.91 (0.68–1.20) ITT 270 135 22.8 21.7 0.99 (0.78–1.26) ATM 69 34 18.4 22.1 1.21 (0.77–1.90) a Calculated by stratified Cox proportional hazard model.

14046 Background: LDM CTX is a minimally toxic anti-angiogenic therapy that has demonstrated activity in multiple tumour types including HRPC. Increased Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX 2, a prostaglandin synthase enzyme) expression appears to be a consistent feature of a variety of human tumours, including prostate cancer. COX 2 inhibitors like CEL exhibit anti-tumour activity in pre-clinical studies, at least in part due to their anti-angiogenic activity. Pre-clinical work supports the concept that the combination of selective angiogenesis inhibitors like CEL with metronomic chemotherapy can enhance the effects of these agents on tumour angiogenesis. Methods: Men with asymptomatic HRPC at a single Canadian centre received celecoxib 400 mg po BID and cyclophosphamide 50 mg po daily. The primary efficacy endpoint of this 2 stage phase II study is disease control rate (DCR): 50% PSA response, tumour response or prolonged (=6 mos) PSA or stable measurable disease. This study is also assessing the safety of LDM CTX and CEL as well as potential anti-angiogenic biomarkers in these patients including circulating endothelial cells and their precursors (CEC/P), plasma levels of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Results: Enrollment for the first stage of this study (10 men) has been completed. There were 2 patients with disease control by the a priori criteria: one patient with a partial tumour response (PR) (PR duration 13 mos with PSA stabilization for 12 mos) and one patient that had both prolonged stable PSA (7 mos) and prolonged stable measurable disease (8 mos). In addition, another patient had an unconfirmed PR. The therapy was well tolerated. One patient had angina that responded well to medical therapy but there were no serious arterial-thromboembolic events. One patient developed grade 3 hypertension. All other toxicities were grade 1/2. Data on CEC/P, TSP-1 and VEGF levels will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: LDM CTX + CEL is a well tolerated therapy in men with asymptomatic HRPC. 2/10 patients achieved disease control in the first stage of the trial, meeting the criteria to proceed to the second stage. [Table: see text]