Brown, Robert A.

ABSTRACTWe are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm‐associated orthopedic foreign‐body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low‐amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with no current, in a rat femoral foreign‐body infection model. In the infected group, a platinum implant seeded with S. epidermidis biofilm (105 CFU/cm2), plus 50 μL of a 109 CFU suspension of bacteria, were placed in the femoral medullary cavity of 71 rats. One week later, rats were assigned to one of four groups: infected with no current or DC, or uninfected with no current or DC. After 2 weeks, bones were removed and subjected to histopathology, micro‐computed tomography (μCT), and strength testing. Histopathology showed no inflammation or bony changes/remodeling in the uninfected no current group, and some osteoid formation in the DC group; bones from the infected no current group had evidence of inflammation without bony changes/remodeling; along with inflammation, there was moderate osteoid present in the DC group. μCT showed more cortical bone volume and density, trabecular thickness, and cancellous bone volume in the DC group compared with the no current group, for both uninfected and infected bones (p < 0.05). There was no difference in torsional strength or stiffness between the no current versus DC groups, for both infected and uninfected bones (p > 0.05). © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

AbstractBackgroundToll‐like receptor 3 (TLR3) is implicated in the pathogenesis of viral diseases owing to its ability to recognize viral double‐stranded RNA. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in TLR3 gene that impairs the function of the protein‐receptor influences the outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation.MethodsThe clinical characteristics of 611 liver recipients (HCV‐infected: n = 153, non‐HCV‐infected: n = 458) were assessed to investigate the impact of TLR3 L412F SNP on transplant outcomes.ResultsTLR3 L412F is common, and it was significantly more prevalent among the HCV‐infected cohort (57.5% vs. 45.2%, P = 0.008). In a multivariate analysis, TLR3 L412F was significantly associated with chronic hepatitis C (odds ratio: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13–2.65, P = 0.01). In an analysis that compared HCV‐infected patients with wild‐type versus TLR3 L412F, a marginally higher rate of allograft failure and mortality was observed in the TLR3 L412F group (44.3% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.09). However, in a multivariate analysis, only donor age was significantly associated with allograft failure and mortality (relative risk: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.007–1.06, P = 0.02).ConclusionTLR3 L412F is significantly common in HCV‐infected liver recipients, and may be associated with worse outcomes. However, larger studies are needed to determine its significant association with allograft failure and mortality after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C.

AbstractHuman herpesvirus‐6 (HHV‐6) is unique among human herpesviruses because of its ability to integrate into chromosomes. This entity, termed chromosomally integrated HHV‐6 (CIHHV‐6), is often mistaken for active infection and treated unnecessarily. The clinical significance of CIHHV‐6 in transplant recipients is not defined. Herein, the clinical characteristics of 7 liver transplant patients with CIHHV‐6 from our recent study, together with 14 other published cases of CIHHV‐6 were reviewed. Of the 21 cases, CIHHV‐6B was reported most commonly among solid organ transplant recipients, while CIHHV‐6A was mostly seen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. None of the 21 patients developed clinical symptoms related to HHV‐6 after transplantation. However, antiviral therapy was administered to 5 asymptomatic patients mistaken to have HHV‐6 infection because of their very high HHV‐6 DNA levels, 3 who developed symptomatic cytomegalovirus disease, and 1 with graft‐versus‐host disease that was mistaken for HHV‐6 infection. In patients who received antiviral therapy, there was no apparent decline in HHV‐6 DNA load, although change in viral kinetics is difficult to discern in the setting of high baseline HHV‐6 DNA load. Clinicians should be aware of this entity of CIHHV‐6 so that antiviral therapy can be considered in the proper clinical context.

ABSTRACT Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in clinical specimens is progressively becoming a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in the immunocompromised host. We evaluated two automated and reproducible PCR tests, the LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) and the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif.), for the detection of CMV DNA in blood samples from transplant recipients with CMV infection as determined by shell vial culture. Following a log transformation analysis, the mean CMV DNA in plasma (PL), whole blood (WB), peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using the LightCycler was 6.79 copies per ml, 7.23 copies per ml, 6.38 copies per 2 × 10 6 cells, and 6.27 copies per 2 × 10 6 cells, respectively. This compares to 7.86 copies per ml, 8.37 copies per ml, 7.59 copies per 2 × 10 6 cells, and 7.44 copies per 2 × 10 6 cells, respectively, using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor. While higher CMV DNA levels were observed for the various blood compartments analyzed using COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor, a high degree of correlation was evident between the two automated systems (jackknife correlation r = PL 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.64, 0.90], WB 0.77 [95% CI; 0.62, 0.92], PBL 0.77 [95% CI; 0.67, 0.88], and PBMC 0.81 [95% CI; 0.72, 0.89], all P < 0.001). Therefore, we conclude that either automated diagnostic system is accurate for CMV DNA quantitation.