Cordero, Kelly Nett

Objective Evaluate the effectiveness of a digital home monitoring program for infants with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L), compared to monitoring through in-person clinic visits. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting One metropolitan pediatric hospital. Patients Eight-eight infants with CP ± L: 41 infants received digital home monitoring and 47 infants were monitored solely through in-person visits. Interventions Beginning in September 2022, all infants with CP ± L were enrolled in a digital home monitoring program, in which caregivers weighed their child weekly at home and submitted those weights, along with subjective evaluations of their child's feeding, using a secure website. Submissions were monitored by the cleft team nurse coordinator. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was the incidence of malnutrition at 4 months of age. The secondary outcome was the average number of in-person clinic visits during the first 4 months of life. Results There was not a significant difference ( P = .764) in the incidence of malnutrition between infants monitored in-person compared to infants in the home monitoring program (13% vs 17%). Infants in the home monitoring program had fewer in-person visits with speech–language pathology (5.4 vs 3.9; P < .001). Across groups, malnutrition was associated with Child Protective Services involvement ( P = .001) and presence of a syndrome ( P = .014). Conclusions The digital home monitoring program did not decrease the incidence of malnutrition, but it did reduce the number of speech–language pathology in-person visits. The program appears to distinguish infants who are gaining weight appropriately from those with feeding challenges, but it does not fully address the multifactorial contributors to malnutrition.

Assess agreement of hypernasality and audible nasal emission (ANE) ratings between audio-recordings and a clinic setting. Cross-sectional study using retrospective clinical recordings. Audio-recording ratings by two trained speech language pathologists. Percent agreement and intra- and inter-rater reliability of perceptual ratings. Intra-rater reliability (AC2) of 167 audio-recorded speech samples for the primary and secondary raters, respectively, was 0.82 and 0.79 for hypernasality; for ANE, it was 0.57 and 0.75. Inter-rater reliability was 0.77 for hypernasality and 0.63 for ANE. When comparing ratings made from audio-recording versus the original clinical ratings, intra-rater reliability was 0.85 and 0.61 (primary and secondary rater, respectively) for hypernasality and 0.21 and 0.34 for ANE. Ratings for hypernasality made from audio recordings were consistent with clinical evaluation, while ratings of ANE were not. ANE ratings made from audio recordings may not be a valid measure of velopharyngeal insufficiency speech characteristics.

Background: Palate re-repair has been proposed as an effective treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) with a low risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients achieving normal speech resonance following palate re-repair for VPI, the proportion developing OSA, and the criteria for patient selection that are associated with increased effectiveness. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception through April 2018 for English language articles evaluating palate re-repair for the treatment of VPI in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Inclusion criteria included reporting of hypernasality, nasal air emission, nasometry, additional VPI surgery, and/or OSA outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Risk of bias was assessed regarding criteria for patient selection, blinding of outcome assessors, and validity of speech assessment scale. Results: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The incidence of achieving no consistent hypernasality follow palate re-repair was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-75%). The incidence of additional surgery for persistent VPI symptoms was 21% (95% CI: 12%-33%). The incidence of OSA was 28% (95% CI: 13%-49%). Criteria for selecting patients to undergo re-repair varied, with anterior/sagittal position of palatal muscles (33%) and small velopharyngeal gap (22%) being the most common. No specific patient selection criteria led to superior speech outcomes ( P = .6572). Conclusions: Palate re-repair achieves normal speech resonance in many but not all patients with VPI. Further research is needed to identify the specific examination and imaging findings that predict successful correction of VPI with re-repair.