Back to Authors

Stutzman, Marissa J.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Abstract 13281: Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Endophenotype Determines the Yield of Ultra-Rare RYR2 Variants in Youthful Unexplained Sudden Cardiac Arrest
Stutzman, Marissa J., Tester, David J. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Giudicessi, John R.

Circulation | April 28, 2022 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.13281 Get It

Introduction: Loss-of-function variants in the RYR2-encoded cardiac calcium release channel underlie a small number of unexplained sudden cardiac arrest and death (SCA/SCD) cases. Objective: To determine if the yield of ultra-rare RYR2 variants in unexplained SCA patients with a default diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) depends on pre-defined IVF endophenotype and whether RYR2 variant-positive IVF cases have a discernible electrocardiographic phenotype. Methods: All SCA cases referred to Mayo Clinic’s Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic between 01/2000 and 04/2021 were reviewed. After exclusion of 116 cases where a probable SCA root cause was identified and/or RYR2 genetic testing was not pursued, a total of 64 unexplained SCA cases (36% female; 26 ± 11 years at the time of SCA) were included. Clinical data was extracted from the medical record and patients classified as having i) IVF (no diagnostic clues), N=38 (59%) ii) PVC-triggered ventricular fibrillation (PTVF; documented short coupled PVC-triggered ventricular arrhythmias), N=19 (30%), or iii) early repolarization syndrome (ERS; J-point elevation ≥0.1 mV in ≥2 contiguous leads, excluding leads V 1 -V 3 ), N=7 (11%). The yield of ultra-rare, non-synonymous RYR2 variants (MAF<0.0001 in the Genome Aggregation Database) and electrocardiographic profiles were then compared. Results: Overall, a qualifying, ultra-rare RYR2 non-synonymous variant was identified in 5 out of 64 (7.8%) unexplained SCA patients. Of note, the yield of ultra-rare RYR2 missense variants was significantly higher in individuals with an PTVF endophenotype than those without [4/19 (21%) versus 1/45 (2.2%), p=0.02]. Interestingly, the majority of ultra-rare RYR2 variant-positive unexplained SCA survivors [3/5 (60%)] displayed an exercise stress test pattern characterized by the onset of ventricular ectopy at ~120 bpm with suppression at heart rates ≥140 bpm. Conclusions: The burden of ultra-rare RYR2 variants is higher in unexplained SCA patients with documented PTVF. Collectively, this data suggests that i) a subset of PTVF may have an underlying genetic basis and ii) some IVF- and PTVF-associated RYR2 variants may result in an identifiable electrocardiographic profile.
Prevalence and electrophysiological phenotype of rare SCN5A genetic variants identified in unexplained sudden cardiac arrest survivors
Giudicessi, John R. , Ye, Dan , Stutzman, Marissa J., Zhou, Wei , Tester, David J. , Ackerman, Michael J.

EP Europace | February 14, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 622-631

10.1093/europace/euz337 Get It

Abstract Aims To determine the prevalence and in vitro electrophysiological (EP) phenotype of ultra-rare SCN5A variants of uncertain significance (VUS) identified in unexplained sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. Methods and results Retrospective review of 73 unexplained SCA survivors was used to identify all patients that underwent a form of genetic testing that included comprehensive SCN5A analysis. Ultra-rare SCN5A variants (minor allele frequency &lt; 0.005) were adjudicated according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Variants designated as VUS were expressed heterologously and characterized using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Overall, 60/73 (82%; the average age at SCA 28 ± 12 years) unexplained SCA survivors had received SCN5A genetic testing. Of these, 5/60 (8.3%) had an ultra-rare SCN5A variant. All SCN5A variants were classified as VUS. Whereas the single SCN5A VUS (p.Asp872Asn-SCN5A) identified in an unexplained SCA survivor with PR interval prolongation and inferior early repolarization conferred a loss-of-function phenotype (46.2% reduction in peak current density; 16 ms slower recovery from inactivation), the four other SCN5A VUS (p.Glu30Gly-SCN5A, p.Gln245Lys-SCN5A, p.Pro648Leu-SCN5A, and p.Glu1240Gln-SCN5A) identified in unexplained SCA survivors without early repolarization/conduction delay were indistinguishable from wild-type Nav1.5 channels. Conclusion In the absence of a phenotype(s) potentially attributable to sodium channel dysfunction, all SCN5A VUS identified in unexplained SCA survivors conferred a wild-type EP phenotype in vitro. As the background rate of SCN5A genetic variation is not trivial, great care must be taken to avoid prioritizing genotype over phenotype when attempting to ascertain the root cause of an individual's SCA.