Narod, Steven A.

Abstract Mitochondria have been implicated in carcinogenesis because of their central role in apoptosis, free radical production, and cellular energy metabolism. Although studies have identified somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in ovarian cancers, little attention has been directed to the possible role of germline mitochondrial variants in mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent ovarian cancer development. Through an ongoing epithelial ovarian cancer genome-wide association study of 1,856 invasive cases (59% with serous carcinomas) and 1,912 controls (frequency-matched on age, race, and study site), we genotyped 138 SNPs tagging variation in the maternally-inherited mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) to evaluate the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in mtDNA are associated with ovarian cancer risk. All subjects were non-Hispanic, non-Jewish Caucasians, and were genotyped with the Illumina 610-quad Beadchip. Samples and SNPs with call rates less than 95% were excluded. Subjects with ambiguous gender, unresolved identical genotypes, and less than 80% European ancestry were excluded. For each SNP, logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) between carriers of the minor versus major maternally-inherited allele and case status. Subgroup analysis was conducted to estimate allele-specific risks between serous-only cases and controls. Haplotype analysis was performed for regions containing statistically significant SNPs (p<0.05). Two rare SNPs, C16329T in the displacement loop gene (MT-D-loop) (OR: 6.72, 95%CI: 1.5-29.8, p=0.004; minor allele frequency (MAF)=0.001) and C15905T in the tRNA threonine gene (MT-TT) (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.1-2.3, p=0.009; MAF=0.027), were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk; whereas T6777C in the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (MT-CO1) (OR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.51-0.91, p=0.009; MAF=0.063) was associated with decreased risk. All three SNPs remained statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons within the mitochondrial SNPs using permutation testing. C16329T and T6777C were also significantly associated among cases with serous histology, with ORs (95% CIs) of 6.13 (1.2-29.6) and 0.61 (0.43-0.87), respectively. Haplotype analysis for each of the three regions investigated revealed significant haplotype-disease associations; however, findings suggest that the respective associations were driven by the most significant SNP(s) listed above. This is the first large-scale epidemiologic study to provide evidence that SNPs in mitochondrial genes may be novel risk factors for ovarian cancer. Future investigation of additional mitochondrial variants (i.e. nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins) is necessary to more comprehensively investigate this association. Furthermore, replication of the most promising SNPs in a larger population is warranted to validate these findings. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2835.

Abstract Inherited BRCA1/2 mutations confer elevated ovarian cancer risk. Knowledge of factors that can improve ovarian cancer risk assessment in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is important because no effective early detection for ovarian cancers exists. A cohort of 1,575 BRCA1 and 856 BRCA2 mutation carriers was used to evaluate haplotypes at ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CTIP, MRE11, NBS1, RAD50, RAD51, and TOPBP1 in ovarian cancer risk. In BRCA1 carriers, no associations were observed with ATM, BARD1, CTIP, RAD50, RAD51, or TOPBP1. At BRIP1, an association was observed for one haplotype with a multiple testing corrected P (Pcorr) = 0.012, although no individual haplotype was significant. At MRE11, statistically significant associations were observed for one haplotype (Pcorr = 0.007). At NBS1, we observed a Pcorr = 0.024 for haplotypes. In BRCA2 carriers, no associations were observed with CTIP, NBS1, RAD50, or TOPBP1. Rare haplotypes at ATM (Pcorr = 0.044) and BARD1 (Pcorr = 0.012) were associated with ovarian cancer risk. At BRIP1, two common haplotypes were significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk (Pcorr = 0.011). At MRE11, we observed a significant haplotype association (Pcorr = 0.012), and at RAD51, one common haplotype was significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk (Pcorr = 0.026). Variants in genes that interact biologically withBRCA1 and/or BRCA2 may be associated with modified ovarian cancer risk in women who carry BRCA1/2 mutations. [Cancer Res 2009;69(14):5801–10]

Abstract Introduction: Tissue microarrays (TMA) enable rapid analysis of biomarkers in large-scale studies involving archival tumor specimens, however, their utility in heterogeneous tumors such as ovarian cancer is limited. Methods: In this study, immunohistochemical analysis was done on TMAs comprised of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to estimate the prevalence of loss of expression of three mismatch repair proteins. TMAs were initially created using cores sampled from the center of donor tissue blocks from 59 EOC cases. Full sections were subsequently created and levels of expression were compared between tissues sampled from the central portion versus the periphery. Follow-up analyses were done by obtaining cores from the periphery of up to five additional donor blocks per case. A linear mixed model for each protein was used to investigate differences between results from the initial and follow-up blocks. Results: In the original TMAs created using centrally sampled cores, loss of mismatch repair expression was noted in 17 (29%) of the 59 cases. By comparison, analyses from peripherally sampled cores revealed loss of expression in only 6 of these 17 cases. For each protein, significant differences (P < 0.05) were detected between results from the initial donor block and the majority of the follow-up blocks. Conclusions: Our investigations, based on EOC, suggest that sampling variability in protein expression may result when TMAs are used. Thus, at least for EOC, it is important to preferentially sample from the periphery of tumor blocks where exposure to tissue fixatives is optimal. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(1):28–34)

AbstractThe AURKA oncogene is associated with abnormal chromosome segregation and aneuploidy and predisposition to cancer. Amplification of AURKA has been detected at higher frequency in tumors from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers than in sporadic breast tumors, suggesting that overexpression of AURKA and inactivation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cooperate during tumor development and progression. The F31I polymorphism in AURKA has been associated with breast cancer risk in the homozygous state in prior studies. We evaluated whether the AURKA F31I polymorphism modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2. Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 was established to provide sufficient statistical power through increased numbers of mutation carriers to identify polymorphisms that act as modifiers of cancer risk and can refine breast cancer risk estimates in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. A total of 4,935 BRCA1 and 2,241 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 11 individuals carrying both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was genotyped for F31I. Overall, homozygosity for the 31I allele was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined [hazard ratio (HR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.77-1.06]. Similarly, no significant association was seen in BRCA1 (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75-1.08) or BRCA2 carriers (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67-1.29) or when assessing the modifying effects of either bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy or menopausal status of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. In summary, the F31I polymorphism in AURKA is not associated with a modified risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(7):1416–21)