Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano

Abstract Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.

e22537 Background: Germline and tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) are complementary tests whose benefit in capturing patients (pts) potentially eligible for precision therapies is maximized when the tests are paired, as qualifying pathogenic variants (PVs) are missed if either test was done in isolation (Lincoln et al. 2020). Germline NGS has the additional benefit of informing prevention through surveillance and cascade testing. We highlight the benefits of a universal approach to concurrent testing in a subset of the previously reported cohort of pan-cancer pts who underwent universal germline NGS (Samadder et al. 2020). Methods: Unselected pts with solid tumors underwent an 80+ gene germline panel and 315+ gene tumor panel. Variants in genes unique to the germline or tumor panels, including microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), were also evaluated. Results: 104 pts [81.7% White, non-Hispanic, 71.2% male] with 23 cancer types [28% colorectal, 13% lung, 11% prostate, 49% other] were included. Five (5%) pts had no actionable tumor alterations or germline variants identified (Table). 18 pts (17%) had 19 pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) identified, 11 (58%) of which were detected on tumor NGS (Table). 92 pts had >1 tumor alteration identified, of which 12% were confirmed as PGVs (Table). Notably, tumor NGS revealed 81 pts (78%) pts with biomarkers that would could not have been identified with germline testing alone, such as variants in genes not on germline panel (80) or MSI-high (4), or TMB-high (21) status of the tumor. Conclusions: Germline and tumor NGS are complementary tests that often detect different actionable alterations. There is value in confirming both the presence and absence of somatic variants in the germline in order to make appropriate clinical recommendations for the patient and their family members. [Table: see text]

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) inhibitors are now being included in the treatment guidelines of multiple countries for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Activation of the FGF–FGFR pathway is related to proliferation and tumor progression. Targeting the FGF–FGFR pathway is effective and can yield durable responses in patients with CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. In this review article, we address molecules and clinical trials evaluating FGFR inhibitors in advanced CCA. We will further discuss identified mechanisms of resistance and the strategies to overcome it. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing in advanced CCA and circulating tumor DNA on disease progression will unveil mechanisms of resistance and improve the development of future clinical trials and more selective drugs and combinations.

502 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an epithelial malignancy of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tree, primarily driven by chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Given fibrosis has shown to correlate with malignancy and the aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) score, a marker for hepatic fibrosis, has shown to be useful in prognosticating hepatocellular carcinoma, this study aimed to assess the utility of APRI score in prognosticating post-surgical outcomes in CCA patients. Methods: 152 CCA patients at the Mayo Clinic that underwent surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analyses were then conducted to determine the relationship between APRI score and demographic factors, laboratory values (CA19-9, albumin, bilirubin, INR, alkaline Phosphatase, ALT, AST, and platelet count), pathology features, and outcome data. Results: When looking at demographic factors, no relationship between APRI score and age (r = -0.19, p = 0.02), sex (2-sample t-test p = 0.16) and race (ANOVA p = 0.81) were identified. There was a negative correlation between APRI score and albumin (m = -0.35, r = -0.35, p < 0.01) and a positive correlation with bilirubin (m = 0.13, r = 0.23, p = 0.01) and ALT (m = 0.01, r = 0.47, p < 0.01). No correlation between the other laboratory values analyzed was identified. Similarly, there was no relationship between APRI score and pathology features (tumor grade t-test p = 0.41, N Stage ANOVA p = 0.94, Vascular Invasion t-test p = 0.59, and Perineural invasion t-test p = 0.14), except for T3 stage which had a higher APRI score compared to T1, T2, and T4 (ANOVA p = 0.01). Likewise, APRI also did not correlate with post-surgical outcomes like recurrence (t-test p = 0.22) and mortality (t-test p = 0.39). Conclusions: In summary, despite being driven by chronic inflammation, APRI score, a marker for hepatic inflammation and a surrogate for liver fibrosis, did not serve as a reliable prognostication tool of post-surgical outcomes in CCA patients. These data suggest that although chronic inflammation is thought to be one of the primary drivers of disease, the role of other factors such as genetic and cellular signaling abnormalities may play a more prominent role in patients with CCA. In conclusion, APRI score did not serve as a useful prognostication tool in surgically resected CCA patients. Future studies should focus on other prognostic factors such as genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers in CCA.

Abstract Background Despite multiple randomized trials, the role of perioperative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is still under debate. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we aim to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative systemic therapies for patients with CRLM. Methods We searched various databases for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through May 2021.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the addition of perioperative (post, pre, or both) systemic therapies to surgery alone in patients with CRLM. The outcomes were compared according to the chemotherapy regimen using a random effects model. Outcomes of interest included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Seven RCTs with a total of 1504 patients with CRLM were included. Six studies included post-operative treatment and one evaluated perioperative (pre- and postoperative) therapy. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was the most used systemic therapy. NMA showed benefit of adding perioperative therapy to surgery in terms of DFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.84). However, these findings did not translate into a statistically significant OS benefit (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05). NMA did not show any advantage of one regimen over another including oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Conclusions This systematic review and NMA of 7 RCTs found that the addition of perioperative systemic treatment for resectable CRLM could improve disease-free survival but not overall survival. Based on the findings, addition of perioperative treatment in resectable CRLM should be individualized weighing the risks and benefits.