Back to Authors

Bunnett, Nigel W.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3367-0644

Mayo Clinic

The University of Melbourne

Citations 2

Legumain is activated in macrophages during pancreatitis
Edgington‐Mitchell, Laura E. , Wartmann, Thomas , Martinez, Alicia K. Fleming , Gocheva, Vasilena, Linden, Wouter A. van der, Withana, Nimali P., Aurelio, Luigi, Edgington-Mitchell, Daniel , Lieu, TinaMarie , Parker, Belinda S. , Graham, Bim , Reinheckel, Thomas , Furness, John B. , Joyce, Johanna A. , Störz, Peter , Halangk, Walter, Bogyo, Matthew , Bunnett, Nigel W. , Fleming, Alicia K, Verdoes, Martijn

American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology | August 11, 2016 | Volume: 311 | Issue: 3 | Pages: G548-G560

10.1152/ajpgi.00047.2016 Get It

Pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas characterized by dysregulated activity of digestive enzymes, necrosis, immune infiltration, and pain. Repeated incidence of pancreatitis is an important risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Legumain, a lysosomal cysteine protease, has been linked to inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis, stroke, and cancer. Until now, legumain activation has not been studied during pancreatitis. We used a fluorescently quenched activity-based probe to assess legumain activation during caerulein-induced pancreatitis in mice. We detected activated legumain by ex vivo imaging, confocal microscopy, and gel electrophoresis. Compared with healthy controls, legumain activity in the pancreas of caerulein-treated mice was increased in a time-dependent manner. Legumain was localized to CD68+ macrophages and was not active in pancreatic acinar cells. Using a small-molecule inhibitor of legumain, we found that this protease is not essential for the initiation of pancreatitis. However, it may serve as a biomarker of disease, since patients with chronic pancreatitis show strongly increased legumain expression in macrophages. Moreover, the occurrence of legumain-expressing macrophages in regions of acinar-to-ductal metaplasia suggests that this protease may influence reprogramming events that lead to inflammation-induced pancreatic cancer.
Endothelin-converting enzyme 1 degrades neuropeptides in endosomes to control receptor recycling
Roosterman, Dirk , Cottrell, Graeme S. , Padilla, Benjamin E. , Muller, Laurent , Eckman, Christopher B., Bunnett, Nigel W. , Steinhoff, Martin

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | June 25, 2007 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 28 | Pages: 11838-11843

10.1073/pnas.0701910104 Get It

Neuropeptide signaling requires the presence of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) at the cell surface. Activated GPCRs interact with β-arrestins, which mediate receptor desensitization, endocytosis, and mitogenic signaling, and the peptide–receptor–arrestin complex is sequestered into endosomes. Although dissociation of β-arrestins is required for receptor recycling and resensitization, the critical event that initiates this process is unknown. Here we report that the agonist availability in the endosomes, controlled by the membrane metalloendopeptidase endothelin-converting enzyme 1 (ECE-1), determines stability of the peptide–receptor–arrestin complex and regulates receptor recycling and resensitization. Substance P (SP) binding to the tachykinin neurokinin 1 receptor (NK 1 R) induced membrane translocation of β-arrestins followed by trafficking of the SP–NK 1 R–β-arrestin complex to early endosomes containing ECE-1a–d. ECE-1 degraded SP in acidified endosomes, disrupting the complex; β-arrestins returned to the cytosol, and the NK 1 R, freed from β-arrestins, recycled and resensitized. An ECE-1 inhibitor, by preventing NK 1 R recycling in endothelial cells, inhibited resensitization of SP-induced inflammation. This mechanism is a general one because ECE-1 similarly regulated NK 3 R resensitization. Thus, peptide availability in endosomes, here regulated by ECE-1, determines the stability of the peptide–receptor–arrestin complex. This mechanism regulates receptor recycling, which is necessary for sustained signaling, and it may also control β-arrestin-dependent mitogenic signaling of endocytosed receptors. We propose that other endosomal enzymes and transporters may similarly control the availability of transmitters in endosomes to regulate trafficking and signaling of GPCRs. Antagonism of these endosomal processes represents a strategy for inhibiting sustained signaling of receptors, and defects may explain the tachyphylaxis of drugs that are receptor agonists.