We present the midterm clinical outcomes and predictors of balloon angioplasty and stent placement in atherosclerotic femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease. Between January 2002 and August 2006, 155 patients (men = 56%; 71.4 ± 10.5 years) underwent 171 FP angioplasty or stent for claudication (n = 82, 54%) or critical limb ischemia ([CLI] n = 70, 46%). Follow-up was obtained through September 30, 2009. The average follow-up was 3.25 ± 1.73 years. In claudicants versus CLI, the 12-month patency for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II (TASC II) classification (TASC A/B) was 93% versus 80%, respectively, and TASC C/D 83% versus 80%. At 3 years, TASC A/B was 82% versus 80%, respectively, and TASC C/D was 56% versus 80%, respectively. The predictor of clinical failure in claudicants was chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and in CLI, the predictor of amputation was hyperlipidemia.
Vascular events that occur in the brain also occur in the eye, giving rise to different ophthalmologic manifestations that range from amaurosis fugax to complete blindness due to central retinal artery occlusion. The objective of this study was to ascertain the relative frequency and predictive value of ocular findings suggestive of carotid occlusive disease in patients being investigated for carotid endarterectomy. The charts of 366 patients undergoing carotid angiography for evaluation of cerebrovascular or visual symptoms over a 5-year period were reviewed. The presence of eye symptoms, neurologic symptoms, cervical bruits, and ophthalmologic findings on admission was recorded and correlated with the presence of significant carotid artery stenosis (? 50%). Positive eye findings included retinal plaques, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, venous stasis retinopathy, central and branch retinal artery occlusion, ischemic optic neuropathy, and asymmetric hypertensive retinopathy. Seventy-five patients (21%) presented with amaurosis fugax; 41 patients (11%) were found to have one or more ocular findings consistent with carotid artery disease. All patients with positive eye findings were diagnosed by ophthalmologists, who were consulted in 94 cases. Of these 41 patients, 29 (70.3%) were subsequently shown to have greater than 50% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery. Ten patients had amaurosis fugax, a carotid bruit, and positive eye findings. All were shown to have a significant carotid stenosis. This study shows that ocular pathology, if diagnosed, is correlated with carotid stenosis, especially if other contributing history and physical findings are also considered.
The Case for an in Situ Lesser Saphenous Vein Bypass
In situ lesser saphenous vein (LSV) graft has been advocated in cases where the greater saphenous vein is not available and the target arteries are confined to the lower leg. This is often the case of diabetic patients, whose occlusive disease pattern typically affects the tibioperoneal vessels, sparing the femoropopliteal segment. The in situ technique offers the potential advantages of decreasing surgical trauma to the vein and its vasa vasorum, better size-matching between vein and artery at the anastomoses, and improving hemodynamics. The authors reviewed the use of in situ LSV graft with attention to its indications and technical requirements. A 73-and a 76-year-old man presented with critical limb ischemia. Both had a history of diabetes, chronic renal failure, and previous use of the greater saphenous veins for coronary or peripheral bypasses. Both had good femoropopliteal inflow and tibioperoneal disease with single runoff through the distal peroneal and common plantar arteries, respectively. Venous mapping showed diminutive veins, with exception of an adequate ipsilateral lesser saphenous vein. The patients were placed in prone position for a posterior approach. The lesser saphenous veins were exposed through a longitudinal incision. Proximal anastomosis was based on the popliteal artery, exposed through the same incision. A successful in situ lesser saphenous vein bypass was performed by using the common plantar and the distal peroneal artery as target vessels. Both bypasses were patent at 24 and 18-months' follow-up, respectively. Selection criteria for in situ LSV bypass are patent femoral arteries; accessible target vessels in prone position through a medial, posterior, or lateral approach; and adequate LSV in diameter and length. In the authors' experience, in situ LSV bypass is a safe and simple option that offers successful distal revascularization.