Chaudhary, Rahul

ImportanceDirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC)–associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has high morbidity and mortality. The safety and outcome data of DOAC reversal agents in ICH are limited.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and outcomes of DOAC reversal agents among patients with ICH.Data SourcesPubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception through April 29, 2022.Study SelectionThe eligibility criteria were (1) adult patients (age ≥18 years) with ICH receiving treatment with a DOAC, (2) reversal of DOAC, and (3) reported safety and anticoagulation reversal outcomes. All nonhuman studies and case reports, studies evaluating patients with ischemic stroke requiring anticoagulation reversal or different dosing regimens of DOAC reversal agents, and mixed study groups with DOAC and warfarin were excluded.Data Extraction and SynthesisPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and abstracted data. Data were pooled using the random-effects model.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was proportion with anticoagulation reversed. The primary safety end points were all-cause mortality and thromboembolic events after the reversal agent.ResultsA total of 36 studies met criteria for inclusion, with a total of 1832 patients (967 receiving 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate [4F-PCC]; 525, andexanet alfa [AA]; 340, idarucizumab). The mean age was 76 (range, 68-83) years, and 57% were men. For 4F-PCC, anticoagulation reversal was 77% (95% CI, 72%-82%; I2 = 55%); all-cause mortality, 26% (95% CI, 20%-32%; I2 = 68%), and thromboembolic events, 8% (95% CI, 5%-12%; I2 = 41%). For AA, anticoagulation reversal was 75% (95% CI, 67%-81%; I2 = 48%); all-cause mortality, 24% (95% CI, 16%-34%; I2 = 73%), and thromboembolic events, 14% (95% CI, 10%-19%; I2 = 16%). Idarucizumab for reversal of dabigatran had an anticoagulation reversal rate of 82% (95% CI, 55%-95%; I2 = 41%), all-cause mortality, 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%, I2 = 0%), and thromboembolic events, 5% (95% CI, 3%-8%; I2 = 0%). A direct retrospective comparison of 4F-PCC and AA showed no differences in anticoagulation reversal, proportional mortality, or thromboembolic events.Conclusions and RelevanceIn the absence of randomized clinical comparison trials, the overall anticoagulation reversal, mortality, and thromboembolic event rates in this systematic review and meta-analysis appeared similar among available DOAC reversal agents for managing ICH. Cost, institutional formulary status, and availability may restrict reversal agent choice, particularly in small community hospitals.

Abstract Background: COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States (Janssen, Moderna, and Pfizer) have been deemed generally safe and effective. Rare thrombotic events, now termed vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), have been reported after the Janssen and Moderna vaccinations. With millions of vaccinations being administered to adults, it is expected that some deep vein thrombosis (DVT) will occur coincidentally with vaccination. Whether COVID-19 vaccinations may contribute to DVT risk more generally (outside of VITT) has not been well studied outside of the initial clinical trials. Aims: Evaluate trends in DVT diagnosis before and after COVID-19 vaccination Methods: Vaccinated patients ≥ 18 years between 11/6/2020 through 6/1/2021 were analyzed using electronic medical records across the Mayo Clinic enterprise. Upper and lower DVT venous Duplex ultrasound (DUS) reports occurring 90 days before and after vaccination date (first dose for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines) were extracted and analyzed with a highly accurate, previously validated, Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm for acute DVT. Results: 382,527 patients with at least 1 COVID-19 vaccination were identified. The median age was 61 (IQR 44-72) and 55.3% were male. Pfizer was the most common vaccine administered (n=245,572, 64.2%), followed by Moderna (n=120,683, 31.6%) and Janssen (n=16,272, 4.3%). Most patients (91.5%) receiving vaccinations were from states with Mayo Clinic health services (Minnesota, n=197,834; Wisconsin, n=80,720; Florida, n=42,391; Arizona, n=28,882). The mean age at vaccination was 61.0 (SD 17.7), 56.5 (SD 19.1), and 54.7 (SD 16.3) for Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen vaccines respectively. Women were most likely to receive the Pfizer (56.3%) compared to Moderna (54.1%) and Janssen (49.5%) vaccines. Non-white patients were most likely to receive Janssen (21%) compared to Moderna (7.7%) and Pfizer (8.2%) vaccines. Among all patients, 7,265 upper and lower venous DUS were performed in 5,960 patients. Figure 1 shows the utilization of DUS before and after COVID-19 vaccination and shows that more patients underwent DUS in the 90 days after vaccination compared to 90 days pre-vaccination. Acute DVT was identified by the NLP algorithm in 808 (714 patients) ultrasounds (11.1%); 656 out of 6136 lower extremity DUS (10.7%) and 152 out of 1129 upper extremity DUS (13.5%). The overall rate of acute DVT (upper and lower) was 1.86 per 1000 patients, consistent with the expected background epidemiologic rate. Figure 2 shows the daily probability of acute DVT by ultrasound report in the 90 days before and after vaccination with a linear regression best fit line showing no overall correlation (R 2 = 0.0). Overall acute DVT post-vaccination occurred on 10.8% of DUS compared to 11.6% pre-vaccination (p=0.28). Among ultrasound reports in Janssen vaccinated patients, 7.0% of post-vaccination compared to 18.0% of pre-vaccination were positive for acute DVT (p=0.003). Among ultrasound reports in Moderna vaccinated patients, 11.0% of post-vaccination compared to 12.7% of pre-vaccination were positive for acute DVT (p=0.15). Among ultrasound reports in Pfizer vaccinated patients, 11.0% of post-vaccination compared to 10.4% of pre-vaccination were positive for acute DVT (p=0.56). Using a Cox proportional hazard model, pre vs post-vaccination time among the same patient cohort was compared for each vaccine. The hazard ratio for DVT post-vaccination was 0.68 (95% CI 0.34-1.38) for Janssen, 1.08 (95% CI 0.86-1.35) for Moderna, and 1.20 (95% CI 0.99-1.46) for Pfizer. After adjusting for age and sex, Pfizer and Janssen's vaccines did not have different risks for DVT compared to Moderna in the 90 days post-vaccination (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.98-1.25 and HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.32 respectively). Conclusions: In this large cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated patients, no increased risk for acute DVT post-vaccination was identified for any of the approved vaccinations in the United States. Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the risk for DVT post-vaccination when comparing each vaccine to each other. The probability of acute DVT on ultrasounds in the 90 days post-vaccination was lower than the pre-vaccination period with the Janssen vaccine possibly indicating over-testing in this group. These results provide additional reassurance of the safety of approved COVID-19 vaccines. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pruthi: HEMA Biologics: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare AG: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria.

BRASH syndrome is characterized by bradycardia, renal failure, AV nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia. The proposed mechanism involves a vicious cycle between AV nodal blockers, hyperkalemia, and renal failure and was first described in 2016. We present a case of a 52-year-old woman who presented with progressively worsening shortness of breath and hypertensive urgency who subsequently developed profound bradycardia and shock that was refractory to resuscitative measures, she was diagnosed with BRASH syndrome. In this article, we explore the predisposing factors and challenges faced during the management of patients with BRASH syndrome.

Introduction: Thrombo-inflammatory syndrome (TIS) characterized by a pathophysiological state of hypercoagulability, heightened platelet function, and inflammation has been observed in patients with acute myocardial infarction, and HIV. Hypothesis: The incidence of TIS is observed at a high rate in COVID-19 patients and worsens with symptom severity Methods: Blood samples from COVID-19 positive hospitalized patients (n=24) was collected for coagulation and platelet function analysis using point-of-care thromboelastography, TEG6s (Haemonetics, Corp) and routine labs were collected to measure markers of inflammation, coagulation, and organ damage (Table). Disease severity was grouped according to oxygen supplementation requirements and comparisons were made using unpaired t-test and chi-squared tests. Thrombo-inflammation was defined as the presence of both hypercoagulability by TEG [Clot initiation (R) < 4.6, fibrin clot strength (FCS) >32mm, and platelet fibrin clot strength (PFCS) >69] and D-dimer >ULN. Results: Ninety- five percent of COVID positive patients had at least one co-morbidity with the incidence of hypertension (71%), diabetes (50%), and obesity (42%) being the most frequent. A total of 63% (16/24) of patients had TIS, the incidence was significantly increased with escalating disease severity (p=0.03). A significant stepwise (p<0.05) increase in FCS, D-Dimer, WBC count, lactate dehydrogenase, and procalcitonin was observed with worsening respiratory function (table). MA-ADP a measure of platelet function was in the high normal range for 81 % of patients. Conclusions: Thrombo-inflammatory is observed with most COVID patients, importantly heightened platelet function is a component of the syndrome and raises the question if antiplatelet therapy is needed in select COVID patients. Selective assessments with TEG6s may facilitate antithrombotic personalization.

Antiplatelet agents are the standard of practice in the management of atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndrome. In contrast to the available antiplatelet agents, vorapaxar represents a novel mechanism of action. It is an antagonist of the platelet protease-activated receptor-1 and inhibits thrombin-induced and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-induced platelet aggregation. The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA 2°P-TIMI 50) trial led to the approval of vorapaxar by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral arterial disease. TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial showed that the use of vorapaxar (2.5 mg once/daily) in addition to standard dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor was effective in the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombotic events among patients with previous atherothrombosis, particularly in patients with prior MI; at the expense of an increase in major bleeding. Another recently published Vorapaxar Therapy in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction Treated With Newer Generation P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor (VORA-PRATIC) study showed that among post-MI patients treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor), vorapaxar reduced platelet-driven global thrombogenicity, an effect that persisted, albeit attenuated, in the absence of aspirin. The current review summarizes an up-to-date literature on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of vorapaxar and proposes future directions of research.

Background: Thromboelastography (TEG®) is used across a wide range of clinical settings to identify patients at risk for thrombosis and coagulopathic bleeding and may be a useful diagnostic tool to guide antithrombotic treatment in patients with COVID-19. Hypothesis: TEG® identifies symptom progression in COVID -19 patients, particularly in the high-risk minority population known to have worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Whole blood from African American and Hispanic hospitalized COVID positive (n=22) and negative outpatients (n=24) was analyzed using point-of-care TEG®6s (Haemonetics, Corp). TEG® parameters including clot initiation (R), fibrin clot strength (FCS), platelet-fibrin clot strength (PFCS) and clot lysis (LY30) were compared across disease severity groups (table). Routine labs including D-Dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and procalcitonin were also collected. Results: Ninety- five percent of COVID positive patients had at least one co-morbidity with the incidence of hypertension (73%), diabetes (55%), and obesity (45%) being the most frequent. R time was more rapid, and FCS and PFCS was significantly higher in COVID positive as compared to negative groups (p<0.03). A stepwise increase in FCS and PFCS was observed with worsening respiratory function (table). Similarly, D-Dimer, CRP, ferritin, and procalcitonin levels were highest in patients receiving ventilator support. No differences were observed in clot lysis between the groups despite elevated D-Dimer levels. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that TEG®6s can identify a prothrombotic phenotype characterized by rapid clot initiation and increased fibrin and platelet-fibrin clot strength in a minority population with COVID-19. Future studies are warranted implementing the TEG6s® in clinical trials to personalize antithrombotic therapy in COVID-19 and improve outcomes.

AbstractObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of carotid access transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta‐analysis of published cases.BackgroundSeveral case series and regional data have provided initial basis for carotid access TAVR in patients with prohibitive femoral approach. We performed this meta‐analysis to provide further evidence of feasibility and safety of carotid TAVR.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL for any study on carotid access TAVR involving ⩾5 patients since inception till March 1, 2020. Random‐effects model was used to compute overall effects. The outcomes analyzed were all‐cause mortality, Transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke, need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, pericardial tamponade, access site complications, major bleeding, and length of stay.ResultsThere was a total of 17 retrospective studies (n = 2082) with a median follow‐up of 1 month. Mean age of the patient was 80 years. Mean Euroscore and STS scores were 15 ± 6.2 and 7.9 ± 3.3, respectively. The procedural success rate was 99%. The rate of all‐cause mortality was 6.7% (range 4.6–9.7%, p < .001, I2 = 67%). Incidence of TIA/stroke was 3.9% (range 3.1–4.8%, p < .001, I2 = 0%) and PPM implantation was 16.7% (range 12.5–21.9%, p < .001, I2 = 56%). Rate of pericardial tamponade, vascular complication, and major bleeding were 1.7, 2.5, and 7%, respectively. Average length of hospital stay was 7.7 days.ConclusionOur results show that transcarotid approach is a feasible option in patients with prohibitive femoral access for TAVR.