Greil, Richard

Abstract Purpose: Controversy exists about CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen efficacy. Experimental Design: A matched case–control study was conducted using the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 8 (ABCSG8) that randomized postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer to tamoxifen for 5 years (arm A) or tamoxifen for 2 years followed by anastrozole for 3 years (arm B). Cases had disease recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, second non–breast cancer, or died. For each case, controls were identified from the same treatment arm of similar age, surgery/radiation, and tumor–node—metastasis (TNM) stage. Genotyping was conducted for alleles associated with no (PM; *3, *4, *6), reduced (IM; *10, and *41), and extensive (EM: absence of these alleles) CYP2D6 metabolism. Results: The common CYP2D6*4 allele was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. In arm A during the first 5 years of therapy, women with two poor alleles [PM/PM: OR, 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–5.73, P = 0.04] and women with one poor allele (PM/IM or PM/EM: OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.95–2.93; P = 0.07) had a higher likelihood of an event than women with two extensive alleles (EM/EM). In years 3 to 5 when patients remained on tamoxifen (arm A) or switched to anastrozole (arm B), PM/PM tended toward a higher likelihood of a disease event relative to EM/EM (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.86–6.66; P = 0.09) among women on arm A but not among women on arm B (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.03–2.30). Conclusion: In ABCSG8, the negative effects of reduced CYP2D6 metabolism were observed only during the period of tamoxifen administration and not after switching to anastrozole. Clin Cancer Res; 19(2); 500–7. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Abstract #57 Background: ABCSG 8 is the only prospective trial examining the value of switching patients (pts) to an aromatase inhibitor after tamoxifen (Tam) in which randomization occurred prior to therapy. This trial demonstrated that 2 years (yrs) of Tam followed by 3 yrs of anastrozole (TAM to A) was superior to 5 yrs of Tam (Jakesz SABC 2005). Tam is metabolically activated by CYP2D6 to endoxifen and pts with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have a higher risk of recurrence (Goetz JCO 2005). The HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) index (Ma Cancer Cell 2004) is associated with Tam resistance while a 5-gene molecular grade index (MGI) distinguishes outcome in grade II tumors. H/I and MGI are complementary prognostic factors that define low (low MGI), intermediate (low H/I, high MGI) and high risk groups (high H/I and MGI) (Ma Clin Cancer Res 2008). We sought to validate these biomarkers in ABCSG Trial 8, and hypothesized that they may predict the benefit of sequencing TAM to A versus Tam alone.
 Methods: From 1996-2004, ABCSG 8 randomized 3,901 pts with ER positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Assuming 40% of pts had reduced CYP2D6 metabolism, we designed a nested case control study in which 110 Tam treated cases matched to 2 controls would yield 80% power to detect a relative risk of 2.3 for pts with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism. Additionally, we sought to perform an exploratory analysis of the benefit of switching from Tam to A in pts with impaired vs non-impaired CYP2D6 metabolism. DNA and RNA derived from paraffin embedded sections were used to genotype for CYP2D6 and to obtain H/I and MGI RT-PCR profiles.
 Findings: Thus far, CYP2D6 genotyping is complete in 345 pts corresponding to 53 cases/106 controls (Tam) and 62 cases/124 controls (Tam to A). DNA and RNA yields were excellent with a CYP2D6 genotype call rate of >95%. CYP2D6 allele frequencies were as expected: *3 (.01), *4, (.23), *6 (.01), *10 (.02), *17 (.00), and *41 (.10). 44% of pts had reduced CYP2D6 metabolism (at least one CYP2D6 null allele or intermediate metabolizer) and 8% were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. For H/I and MGI, 340 pts were profiled with 64%, 20% and 16% in the low, intermediate, and high risk groups, respectively. Tissue sectioning/genotyping for additional cases/controls is ongoing.
 Discussion: This is the first retrospective analysis of a large Tam versus Tam to A trial to evaluate the association between 1) CYP2D6, HOXB13/IL17BR, and MGI with TAM treatment outcome and 2) the predictive benefit of these biomarkers in pts randomized to switch from Tam to AI versus Tam alone. Final results will be presented at the meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 57.

Purpose To compare the use of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with infusional fluorouracil (FU)/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FUFOX) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and Methods A total of 474 patients with MCRC received either CAPOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid, days 1 to 14 plus oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, repeated every 22 days) ) or FUFOX (oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 followed by leucovorin 500 mg/m2 plus FU 2,000 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated every 36 days). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, and toxicity. The study was designed to determine noninferiority for the CAPOX regimen. Results Median PFS was 7.1 months in the CAPOX arm and 8.0 months in the FUFOX arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.43; P = .117). Median OS was 16.8 months (CAPOX) and 18.8 months (FUFOX; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.38; P = .26). Overall RRs were 48% for CAPOX (95% CI, 41% to 54%) and 54% for FUFOX (95% CI, 47% to 60%). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, although there was a significantly higher incidence of grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in the CAPOX arm (P = .028). Conclusion CAPOX resulted in a slightly inferior efficacy than FUFOX. With respect to PFS, the best estimate of the HR of 1.17 was within the prespecified equivalence range. However, a relevant inferiority cannot be excluded. Both regimens were generally well tolerated but there was a significantly higher rate of grade 2/3 HFS in the CAPOX arm.