Back to Authors

Ahnen, Dennis J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1783-1129

Mayo Clinic

University of Colorado Anschutz

Citations 22

The Association of Tumor Microsatellite Instability Phenotype with Family History of Colorectal Cancer
Bapat, Bharati , Lindor, Noralane M. , Siegmund, Kim, Gallinger, Steve, Jass, Jeremy R., Young, Joanne , Cotterchio, Michelle , Jenkins, Mark A. , Grove, John, Casey, Graham , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Bishop, D. Timothy , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Potter, John D. , Seminara, Daniela, Registry, and the Colon Cancer Family, Baron, John A. , Li, Lin , Zheng, Yingye , Haile, Robert W. , Hopper, John L. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Registry, and the Colon Cancer Family, Jenkins, Mark A , Potter, John D , Bishop, D Timothy

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | March 9, 2009 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 967-975

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0878 Get It

Abstract Family history is a strong predictor of colorectal cancer risk; however, a diagnosis of colorectal cancer among first-degree relatives has not been systematically investigated as a function of the colorectal cancer molecular subtypes related to tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) status. We investigated whether the observable familial colorectal cancer risks differed according to tumor MSI subtypes, stratified as MSI-High (>30% instability), MSI-Low (<30% instability), and MSS (no instability). Data from 3,143 population-based colorectal cancer cases from five institutions were assessed for family history according to the Amsterdam criteria and the Bethesda guidelines, age at diagnosis, sex, tumor location, and MSI status. The distribution of patient characteristics by MSI status was compared using polytomous logistic regression. Overall, 2.8% colorectal cancer cases met the Amsterdam criteria and 37% met the Bethesda guidelines. There were 14% MSI-High, 13% MSI-Low, and 73% MSS colorectal cancers. MSI-High (P < 0.0001) and MSI-Low tumors (P = 0.01) were more proximally located than MSS tumors. MSI-High tumors were more common among females (P < 0.001). The highest proportion of MSI-High tumors occurred in cases <40 years of age whereas the age-dependent distribution of MSI-Low tumors was unchanged. MSI-High tumors showed a statistically significant association with increasing numbers of first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer (P = 0.002); this association disappeared, however, when MSI-High cases meeting Amsterdam criteria were removed from the analysis. MSI-Low tumors did not show a similar association with family history of colorectal cancer. Familial risk associated with MSI-High tumors is primarily driven by the Amsterdam-criteria patients. MSI-Low tumors may represent a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer with respect to certain epidemiologic variables studied here. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):967–75)
Priorities in Colorectal Cancer Research: Recommendations From the Gastrointestinal Scientific Leadership Council of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups
O’Dwyer, Peter J. , Haller, Daniel G. , Tepper, Joel E. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Benson, Al B. , Rothenberg, Mace L., Petrelli, Nicholas J. , Lenz, Heinz‐Joseph, Diasio, Robert B. , Dubois, Raymond, Sargent, Daniel J. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Johnson, C. Daniel, Comis, Robert L., Eckhardt, Sabine , Hamilton, Stanley R. , O’Connell, Michael J. , Sargent, Daniel J

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 30, 2007 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 2313-2321

10.1200/jco.2006.08.6900 Get It

Emerging technologies have greatly expanded our ability to detect, characterize, and treat colorectal cancer. The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened a multidisciplinary panel, the Scientific Leadership Council in GI cancer, to discuss and advise on the priorities and opportunities to advance current and future approaches into the clinical arena to impact most rapidly the morbidity and mortality from this disease. The Council's recommendations for research priorities are the result of engagement of community and academic oncologists, patient advocacy groups, and other stakeholders including the pharmaceutical industry and governmental agencies. We detail some key prospects for investigation in the areas of colon cancer detection, prevention, and surgical and medical management. Many are in early or definitive clinical trials, and a focus on rapid accrual is urged. The implementation of biology-directed laboratory investigations, both in association with ongoing clinical trials and as a separate developmental strategy for targeted therapies, is supported as the route to individualized therapy.