Razonable, Raymund R.

Abstract Background RSV is a common respiratory infection that causes significant morbidity in SOTR. However, risk factors for complications such as hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and secondary infections have not been well described. Methods This retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study is actively recruiting SOTR hospitalized with RSV. Here, we analyzed data from Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona), Miami Transplant Institute, Cleveland Clinic, and Royal Melbourne Hospital between 2016 and 2019. Secondary infection was defined as culture positive infection within 90 days of RSV diagnosis. Whenever appropriate, logistic and Cox regression analysis were conducted to identify risk factors. Survival functions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Figure 1:Forest plots of multivariable logistic regression models for risk factors for A) hypoxia, B) secondary infections, C) mechanical ventilation. Note: all variables included are the ones statistically significant on univariate analysis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, Odds ratio; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection. Results 233 SOTRs (58.8% male; median, 61 years), including 77 (49.1%) kidney, 23 (9.9%) liver, 79 (33.9%) lung, and 38 (16.3%) heart transplants (Table). Hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and secondary infection were seen in 98 (42.1%), 23 (9.9%), and 58 (24.9%) patients, respectively. After multivariate analysis, age >60 years, symptoms and imaging evidence of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) were associated with oxygen requirement (Figure 1A); similar results were observed in an analysis of the lung transplant cohort only. Risk factors on multivariate analysis for secondary infection include a history of rejection within six months and mechanical ventilation (Figure 1B). Risk factors for mechanical ventilation included age >60 years and LRTI on imaging (Figure 1C) after multivariate analysis. Seventeen (7.3%) patients died within 90 days of diagnosis. Cox univariate analysis identified age >60 years and LRTI on imaging, secondary infections, mechanical ventilation and hypoxia on admission were associated with higher mortality (Figure 2 and 3).Figure 2:Forest plot with Cox proportional hazards models. Note: only univariate results shown, multivariate not done due to low number of events. Conclusion This multicenter study of SOTR hospitalized with RSV identified older age ( >60 years old) as a risk factor for hypoxic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation and death. Mechanical ventilation and a history if rejection within six months of RSV were associated with increased risk of secondary infections, identifying them as high-risk that needs close surveillance for this complication.Figure 3:Effects of A) Age older than 60 years old and B) mechanical ventilation on 90 day probability of survival after RSV infection Disclosures Michelle Yong, MBBS, FRACP, MPH, PhD, MSD: Grant/Research Support|MSD: Honoraria|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant Yoichiro Natori, MD, Eurofin/Viracor: Honoraria|Nobel Pharma: Advisor/Consultant

ABSTRACT Background Multiple outpatient therapies have been developed for COVID‐19 in high‐risk individuals, but solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were not well represented in controlled clinical trials. To date, few comparative studies have evaluated outcomes between outpatient therapies in this population. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using de‐identified administrative claims data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Patients were included if they were age ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with COVID‐19 between January 2022 and December 2023, and underwent SOT prior to COVID‐19. The primary outcome was 30‐day hospitalization. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for potential confounding variables. Results 4192 SOT recipients with COVID‐19 were identified. 1403 received an outpatient COVID‐19 therapy, including anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies ( N = 748, 53.3%), molnupiravir ( N = 327, 23.3%), ritonavir‐boosted nirmatrelvir ( N = 217, 15.5%), or remdesivir ( N = 141, 10.0%). In weighted analysis compared to no treatment, anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.55; p < 0.001), molnupiravir (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.89; p = 0.013), and nirmatrelvir (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25–0.89; p = 0.020) were associated with reduced hospitalization risk, while remdesivir (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50–1.98; p = 0.992) was not. Hospitalization rates were similar between the treatment agents, apart from remdesivir showing a higher risk compared to anti‐spike monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions Outpatient COVID‐19 therapies were largely associated with improved outcomes among SOT recipients. These treatment agents showed similar rates of 30‐day hospitalization, except for remdesivir. The choice of outpatient COVID‐19 therapy in SOT recipients should primarily account for patients’ individual circumstances and drug‐drug interactions rather than differential therapeutic efficacy. image

Background: Diagnostic uncertainty caused by the low positive predictive value of HEV-specific IgM antibody (Ab) testing in a low-prevalence setting. We investigated the utility of a two-step HEV IgM Ab testing approach for diagnosing HEV infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent HEV IgM Ab and/or HEV RNA testing from July 2013 through June 2023 at Mayo Clinic. Two-step HEV IgM testing involved initial testing using recomWell HEV IgM ELISA (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany), with reflex to recomLine HEV IgM Strip (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany) on all recomWell HEV IgM-reactive or IgM-equivocal specimens, as recomLine HEV IgM has higher specificity than recomWell HEV IgM but is more labor-intensive. Results: A total of 1640 patients had HEV IgM Ab or HEV RNA testing, including 1293 (79%) with only HEV IgM Ab testing, 213 (13%) with only HEV RNA testing, and 134 (8%) with both HEV IgM Ab and HEV RNA testing. Eighteen HEV infections were diagnosed with acute (N=16) and chronic (N=2) infections. Two-step IgM Ab testing did not identify 2 solid organ transplant recipients with chronic HEV infection. In acute HEV infection with HEV viremia, 3 out of 4 patients (2 solid organ transplant recipients and 1 patient with Guillain-Barre syndrome) were treated with ribavirin. Conclusions: A two-step HEV IgM Ab test may accurately diagnose acute HEV infection in immunocompetent persons. However, this approach fails to identify chronic HEV infection in immunocompromised individuals who need HEV RNA testing to establish the diagnosis.

Introduction: The pathogenesis and outcome of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) reflects the interplay between viral replication and CMV-specific immunity. Despite advances in its diagnosis and treatment, CMV continues to cause significant morbidity after SOT. Since CMV is an opportunistic pathogen that occurs as a result of impaired pathogen-specific immunity, laboratory assays that measure CMV-specific immune responses may be useful in assisting clinicians in its management. Methods and Results: The author summarizes the evolving and emerging data on the clinical utility of assays that quantify cell-mediated immune responses to CMV in SOT recipients. The majority of publications are observational studies that demonstrate that a lack or deficiency in CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity is correlated with a heightened risk of primary, reactivation, or recurrent CMV after transplantation. A few prospective interventional studies have utilized CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays in guiding the duration of antiviral prophylaxis among CMV-seropositive SOT recipients. Likewise, CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity assays have been suggested to inform the need for secondary antiviral prophylaxis and immunologic optimization to prevent CMV relapse after treatment. Conclusions: CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays are emerging to assist transplant clinicians in predicting a patient’s risk of CMV after transplantation, and these assays have been utilized to individualize the approach to CMV prevention and treatment. The author suggests the conduct of more interventional studies to further solidify the role of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays in routine clinical practice.

Abstract The field of infectious diseases (ID) offers a rewarding career path and is widely viewed as an essential subspecialty in medicine. However, in recent years, these positive aspects have been overshadowed by concerns surrounding low fellowship match rates, undercompensation, and burnout. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellowship Training Program Directors Committee met in 2023, discussed the future of ID as a specialty, and sought to develop strategies to highlight the value and opportunities of ID for future generations, as well as underscore the importance of and provide tools for positive messaging to trainees about the subspecialty. This paper presents ideas generated at this meeting and is meant to serve as a reference for ID training program directors, as well as the wider ID community, in uplifting and shaping the future of the field.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPreventive strategies for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the posttransplant period have changed the pattern of CMV infections, now more commonly manifesting as late‐onset occurrences known as post‐prophylaxis delayed‐onset CMV disease (PPDOC). We conducted a survey to investigate provider practices in managing PPDOC.MethodsA web‐based provider survey on the management of PPDOC was developed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). It was distributed to the online forums of the American Society of Transplantation communities of practice (COP) for Infectious Diseases (IDCOP), Kidney and Pancreas (KPCOP), Liver and Intestinal (LICOP), and Thoracic and Critical Care (TCCOP). The survey was posted twice within a span of a month.ResultsFifty‐six respondents, comprising 50 (89%) transplant physicians and 6 (11%) transplant pharmacists, from 46 distinct transplant centers, completed the survey. Universal antiviral prophylaxis (UAP) was the predominant preventive approach for both high‐risk (85%) and moderate‐risk (85%) transplant recipients. Out of 56, 51 respondents completed the questions regarding management of PPDOC. Regular surveillance with nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) (88%) was the most commonly used approach in high‐risk recipients, while symptom monitoring (73%) was the most common strategy in moderate‐risk recipients. Immunologic monitoring was used only by a few respondents who found it moderately useful in high‐risk recipients.ConclusionManagement of PPDOC was highly variable among providers and strategies differed based on patient risk profile. These findings could help shape future studies and guidelines to harmonize CMV management.

AbstractBackgroundDevelopment of brain abscess following solid organ transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We undertook a descriptive study to evaluate the etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of brain abscess in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at three major transplant centers in the United States.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of adults with brain abscess following SOT between January 2000 and June 2021 at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Minnesota, and Florida.ResultsA total of 39 patients were diagnosed with a brain abscess following SOT. The most common pathogens were Nocardia sp. (24 cases, 61.5% [Nocardia farcinica, 37.5%]), followed by fungi (12 cases, 30.7% [Aspergillus sp., 83.3%]). The majority were kidney transplant recipients (59%). Median time to brain abscess diagnosis was 1.3 years (range, 29 days–12 years) after SOT; 10 of 12 patients (83%) with fungal brain abscess were diagnosed within 1 year after SOT. Twelve patients underwent brain biopsy for diagnosis (25% Nocardia vs. 50% fungal), eight (20.5%) underwent surgical resection of the abscess, and 31 (79.5%) received antimicrobial therapy alone. Median time to brain abscess resolution was 166 days for Nocardia and 356 days for fungal pathogens. Eleven of 39 patients (28.2%) died as a result of their brain abscess, including four of 24 patients (16%) with Nocardia and six of 10 patients (60%) with Aspergillus brain abscess. All‐cause mortality was 43.6%.ConclusionBrain abscess remains an uncommon infectious complication following SOT. Nocardia and fungi accounted for 92% of pathogens in our cohort. Fungal brain abscess portends a poor prognosis. image

AbstractBackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Secondary prophylaxis (SP) is not routinely recommended by guidelines on the management of CMV in SOTR but may be considered in certain higher‐risk situations.MethodsA comprehensive search of English language publications up to September 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was CMV relapse, defined as the recurrence of DNAemia or disease. Secondary outcomes included graft loss, mortality, and hematological toxicity. Meta‐analysis used the random‐effects model. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022357028).ResultsSix retrospective comparative studies were included. A total of 520/727 (72%) of SOTR received SP with valganciclovir. The meta‐analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in CMV relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–2.63). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (I2 = 0%, p = 0.57). SP was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07–0.54) but not graft loss (OR 0.67, 0.17–2.63). There was no significant difference in CMV relapse among kidney‐specific SOTR (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.65–2.96).ConclusionEvidence from six nonrandomized studies is limited and cannot support a recommendation for or against routine SP in SOTR treated for CMV infection. Awaiting prospective‐controlled trials, the decision about SP should depend on individualized risk‐profile assessments by experienced clinicians. image