Back to Authors

Nelson, Marquita

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3969-2293

Mayo Clinic

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Citations 3

Impact of COVID-19 on Hematology-Oncology Trainees: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Durani, Urshila , Major, Ajay , Velázquez, Ana I. , May, Jori E. , Nelson, Marquita , Zheng, Ze , Hall, Anurekha G. , Alam, Sara Taveras , Reynolds, Robby , Thompson, John Colton, Kumbamu, Ashok , Das, Devika , Murphy, Martina, Henry, Elizabeth , Lee, Alfred Ian , Marshall, Ariela L. , Weeks, Lachelle D. , May, Jori , Wun, Ted , Weeks, Lachelle Dawn , Marshall, Ariela , Major, Ajay , Velazquez, Ana I , Durani, Urshila , Wun, Ted

JCO Oncology Practice | January 6, 2022 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e586-e599

10.1200/op.21.00630 Get It

PURPOSE: Graduate medical and research training has drastically changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with widespread implementation of virtual learning, redeployment from core rotations to the care of patients with COVID-19, and significant emotional and physical stressors. The specific experience of hematology-oncology (HO) fellows during the COVID-19 pandemic is not known. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study using a survey of Likert-style and open-ended questions to assess the training experience and well-being of HO fellows, including both clinical and postdoctoral trainee members of the American Society of Hematology and ASCO. RESULTS: A total of 2,306 surveys were distributed by e-mail; 548 (23.8%) fellows completed the survey. Nearly 40% of fellows felt that they had not received adequate mental health support during the pandemic, and 22% reported new symptoms of burnout. Pre-existing burnout before the pandemic, COVID-19–related clinical work, and working in a primary research or nonclinical setting were associated with increased burnout on multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed significant concerns about employment after training completion, perceived variable quality of virtual education and board preparation, loss of clinical opportunities to prepare for independent clinical practice, inadequate grant funding opportunities in part because of shifting research priorities, variable productivity, and mental health or stress during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: HO fellows have been profoundly affected by the pandemic, and our data illustrate multiple avenues for fellowship programs and national organizations to support both clinical and postdoctoral trainees.
Measuring the Impact of COVID-19 on Hematology-Oncology Trainees: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment
Mañana, Ana I. Velazquez, Nelson, Marquita , Gollapudi, Anurekha, Reynolds, Robby , Thompson, John Colton, Kumbamu, Ashok , Murphy, Martina, Henry, Elizabeth , Lee, Alfred Ian , Durani, Urshila , May, Jori E. , Zheng, Ze , Alam, Sara Taveras , Reynolds, Robby, Das, Devika , Marshall, Ariela L. , Wun, Ted , Weeks, Lachelle D.

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 20-21

10.1182/blood-2020-143347 Get It

Introduction: While the COVID-19 pandemic has affected many aspects of clinical care, research, and medical training, its impact on hematology-oncology trainees and professional development has not been described. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 on fellows enrolled in hematology-oncology programs. Methods: In spring 2020, ASH and ASCO developed and administered a survey by e-mail to active hematology-oncology fellow members. Response formats used both a semi-Likert scale and open-ended text. Questions focused on fellow experiences and how changes in their programs have impacted their personal and professional lives across several domains. Multiple-choice responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and NVivo software was used for qualitative analysis of open-ended questions. Results: Respondent demographics are described in Table 1. Of 2,306 trainees, 620 (27%) responded to the survey. Most respondents continued patient care responsibilities during the pandemic (80%). Almost half of all trainees (47%) reported that they felt less productive than usual. Stress and/or anxiety about the current situation was the most cited factor affecting productivity in the overall cohort (Figure 1). One-third (33%) of respondents had volunteered or were assigned to clinical/non-clinical COVID-19-related efforts. Of the 90 visa holders in our cohort, 30% (N=27) reported experiencing issues with their visa/immigration status. Eight percent of respondents stated their career plans had changed due to COVID-19. Of those who said their plans had changed, 30 respondents were considering careers in academia pre-pandemic and 11 were considering private practice. However, only 14 respondents were considering academia post-pandemic while 19 were interested in private practice. Overall, most respondents had concerns about at least one of the following: salary reductions, availability of networking events, family well-being, mental health and obtaining a job (Figure 2). The prevalence of burnout increased from 22% (N=105) before the pandemic to 33% (N=161) during (p<.001). Of the respondents who did not report burnout before COVID-19, 22% noted new-onset burnout during the pandemic. New-onset burnout prevalence varied based on the type of work respondents performed: no COVID-related work (17%), COVID-related non-clinical work (26%), and COVID-related clinical work (34%) (p<0.01). The open-ended responses yielded several consistent themes. Clinical and educational constraints were enumerated: lost learning opportunities due to low patient volumes, unavailability of colleagues to discuss cases, and overall low perceived quality of virtual learning. Trainees also reported reduced motivation to complete work within a stipulated time frame due to lack of robust discussions in the virtual environment and technological challenges in navigating educational resources. Trainee research was also severely impacted as laboratories closed, experimental animal colonies were lost, and many research activities ceased. Respondents also expressed concern that cuts in research training initiatives and budgets would jeopardize faculty positions for graduating fellows and that funding for travel and conferences was suspended. Fellows' recommendations for ASH and ASCO included improved online education, virtual research training and networking opportunities, practical guidance on caring for immune-compromised patients during the pandemic, increased funding resources for trainees, mental health resources, and advocating on behalf of trainee visa holders. Conclusions: Hematology-oncology trainees reported their training experiences have been deeply impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. A majority of trainees are concerned about the negative impact on career opportunities, research funding, financial well-being, and mental health. Burnout increased during COVID-19, especially in trainees who were assigned to specific COVID-related efforts. Training programs and professional societies can support trainees by increasing trainee research funding, online networking and learning opportunities, mental health resources and, support for international trainees. Disclosures Velazquez Manana: Corbus Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate family member stock ownership; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate family member stock ownership; Midatech: Other: Immediate family member stock ownership. Wun:Glycomimetics, Inc.: Consultancy.
Associations between hematology/oncology fellows’ training and mentorship experiences and hematology-only career plans
Masselink, Leah E. , Erikson, Clese , Connell, Nathan T. , Castro, Laura M. De , Dent, Georgette A. , Marshall, Ariela L. , Naik, Rakhi P. , Nelson, Marquita , Rajasekhar, Anita, Sharma, Deva , Smith, Melody , Lee, Alfred Ian , Marshall, Ariela , Smith, Melody , O'Connell, Casey Lee

Blood Advances | October 31, 2019 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3278-3286

10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000569 Get It

Key PointsClinical, research and mentorship experiences in hematology are positively associated with fellows' plans to pursue hematology-only careers.