Ramakrishna, Jahanavi M.

Abstract Background Vaccine-preventable diseases account for significant morbidity and mortality in the kidney transplant (KT) patient population. AST Guidelines support review and documentation of pneumococcal vaccines in KT candidate infectious disease (ID) evaluations. The objective of this study is to determine the number of KT candidates screened for prior pneumococcal immunizations and the frequency of vaccines ordered by providers when indicated at Mayo Clinic Florida’s (MCF) Transplant Center. Methods This study was an institution-based retrospective analysis of all KT candidates evaluated at MCF from December 2, 2019 – January 14, 2020. Data collection was obtained by electronic health record review. Outcomes included known history and documentation rates of prior pneumococcal vaccinations (both Prevnar 13 and Pneumovax 23) by infectious disease (ID) providers, as well as pneumococcal vaccine order frequency during ID pre-transplant evaluation when indicated. Data analysis was done using simple descriptive statistics. Results Sixty-one patients underwent KT evaluation during the study period. Among the 61 patients, 20 (32.8%) and 20 (32.8%) had a known prior history of receiving Prevnar 13 and Pneumovax 23 vaccinations, respectively. Vaccine history was unknown for Prevnar 13 and Pneumovax 23 in 39 (63.9%) patients. Vaccine status was not documented by ID providers in 2 (3.3%) patients. When appropriate, ID providers ordered Prevnar 13 and Pneumovax 23 in 38 (92.7%) and 41 (100%) patients, respectively. Orders included both electronic and written documentation to account for patients planning immunization elsewhere. Of the 38 patients advised to receive the Prevnar 13 vaccine, 17 (41.5%) patients were documented completing immunization. Pneumovax 23 order completion rates were not recorded since the study period only lasted six weeks due to closure by COVID-19. Table 1. Pneumococcal Vaccine History Documentation Rates Obtained by Patient Recall or Records Table 2. Pneumococcal Vaccine Order Rates at Pre-Kidney Transplant Consultations Table 3. Prevnar 13 Order Completion Rate by Documentation Conclusion The data reflect a high number of patients who either do not recall or have documentation of prior pneumococcal vaccination available at time of KT ID evaluation. Providers documented history of pneumococcal vaccinations extremely well, ordering immunizations when necessary. This study highlights lack of portability of immunization histories in a given patient population and opportunity for improved care. Disclosures Claudia R. Libertin, MD, Pfizer, Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support)

AbstractOptimizing immunity against vaccine‐preventable diseases improves outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) patients (Arora et al,World J Transplant, 2019, 9:1; Sester et al,Transplant Rev, 2008, 22:274; Fishman,N Engl J Med, 2007, 357:2601). The American Society for Transplantation (AST) Clinical Practice Guidelines advises that serologic screening for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) be conducted for all KT candidates, since live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated post‐transplantation (Malinis et al,Clin Transplant, 2019, 33:e13548). Our team at Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative to establish a best MMR screening and immunizations clinical practice in KT candidates using a Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) model. By retrospective chart review of all KT candidates evaluated at our institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, baseline data determining the rate of MMR serologic screening was established. PDSA cycles were implemented to adopt protocol‐driven testing for MMR serologies, immunization documentation, and vaccination in cases of seronegativity to any of the three MMR viruses in all pre‐KT candidates. Two PDSA cycles were completed in 4 months. The study population totaled 447 patients (baseline n = 283, PDSA 1 n = 61, PDSA 2 n = 103). Baseline data showed that 83% (n = 235) of pre‐KT candidates received infectious disease consultation (IDC). Complete MMR (all three viruses) serological screening in KT candidates improved from baseline 3.9%‐87.4% post‐PDSA cycle 2 (P < .001). Necessary immunizations per AST guidelines were ordered in only 41.1% (n = 23) of the control cohort vs 100% (n = 12) and 96.9% (n = 31) of PDSA cycles 1 and 2, respectively (P < .001). The data reflect significant practice improvements in MMR screening and immunization rates among KT candidates by using protocol‐driven orders combined with our pre‐existing IDCs.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic continues to overwhelm global healthcare systems. While the disease primarily causes pulmonary complications, reports of central nervous system (CNS) involvement have recently emerged ranging from encephalopathy to stroke. This raises a practical dilemma for clinicians as to when to pursue neuroimaging and lumbar tap with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. We present a case of an encephalopathic patient infected with SARS-CoV-2 with no pulmonary symptoms. We propose a three-tier risk stratification for CNS COVID-19 aiming to help clinicians to decide which patients should undergo CSF analysis. The neurological examination remains an integral component of screening and evaluating patients for COVID-19 considering the range of emerging CNS complications.

Abstract The pandemic of COVID-19 has presented several diagnostic challenges in both recognition of acute disease and also the temporal presentation of disease convalescence with return to normal activity. We present a case of delayed clinical progression of COVID-19 associated respiratory failure on day 25 after initial symptom onset and, notably, after initial full resolution of symptoms and negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal testing. The patient’s delayed presentation of exertional dyspnea and the utilization of specific characteristics of chest radiography in confirmation with laboratory cytokine measurement allowed for clinical re-categorization of the patient’s status to active COVID-19 clinical disease and changed acute management. COVID-19 positive patients should be advised to continue to monitor for respiratory deterioration for a greatly extended period of time, even if RT-PCR testing is negative and initial clinical symptoms have resolved. Frontline healthcare workers, including first responders and primary care providers, also need to be aware to monitor for and recognize this delayed presentation.

Introduction. Post-operative meningitis (POM) is a life-threatening complication of neurosurgery. Diagnosis is often difficult due to pre-existing inflammation and antecedent antimicrobial use. Bacterial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures may reveal no growth, but empiric antibiotics are typically given due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with POM. 16S rRNA gene PCR/sequencing is a molecular methodology that can identify the presence of bacteria regardless of viability for culture. Case Presentation. A patient presented with a rapid onset of fever associated with headache, neck pain, nausea and altered mental status 11 days after undergoing laser interstitial thermal therapy for treatment of recurrent astrocytoma at another hospital. Based on clinical presentation and imaging, POM was suspected, and empiric antibacterial therapy was started. Microbiological stains and cultures of CSF were negative. Due to persistent fevers, 16S rRNA gene PCR/sequencing was done on CSF; it detected a member of the order Enterobacteriales most closely resembling Serratia species. All antimicrobials were stopped except for cefepime, which was given for 2 weeks. The patient’s mental status fully recovered. Conclusion. The application of 16S rRNA gene PCR/sequencing in the setting of POM is of value by improving the quality of patient care and decreasing costs by antimicrobial de-escalation. Further studies regarding the positive and negative predictive values of this test are required.

Abstract Background Bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus is a known complication of liver transplantation (LT). Studies have shown that LT recipients are more predisposed to S. aureus infections than other solid-organ transplant patients; however, these studies have been limited in scope and mostly based out of single centers. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using 2012–2016 NIS, the largest public inpatient database in the United States. All patients with ICD9-10CM procedural codes for LT were included. The cohort was stratified into two groups depending on whether they had MSSA or MRSA infection. The odds of inpatient mortality in both groups of patients undergoing LT were determined. The inpatient mortality odds were then compared with those of patients undergoing LT without associated S. aureus infection. Other outcomes included inpatient morbidity, resource utilization, hospital length of stay (LOS), and inflation-adjusted total hospital costs and charges. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for demographic variables and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results A total of 26,415 patients underwent LT in the study period, of which 180 had MSSA and 160 had MRSA infection reported. The mean age was 51.5 years and 35.6% were female. Patients with MSSA and MRSA displayed significantly higher inpatient mortality rates (11.1% and 9.4%, respectively) compared with non-MSSA/MRSA patients (3.4%) who underwent LT (P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, patients with MSSA infection displayed higher mortality odds (aOR: 4.45, P < 0.01), while patients with MRSA infection had non-statistically significant higher inpatient mortality odds (aOR: 3.10, P = 0.12) compared with patients without MSSA/MRSA infection. Both MSSA and MRSA cohorts displayed higher mortality odds if the infection resulted in sepsis (aOR: 9.92 and 5.70, respectively; P < 0.01). Conclusion There is a direct correlation between S. aureus bacteremia and increased mortality rates and incidence of sepsis and shock in LT recipients. Patients with S. aureus bacteremia spent more days in hospital and had higher cost of healthcare. Preventing and aggressively treating S. aureus infections in the immediate post-LT setting is key to reducing mortality, morbidity and resource utilization in patients undergoing LT. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.