Hayman, Suzanne

Abstract Frailty predicts adverse outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM), yet an objective frailty biomarker is lacking. Circulating senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors correlate with frailty and adverse outcomes in chronic diseases, but their relevance in MM is unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between 36 plasma SASP factors, frailty, and clinical outcomes in: (1) a historical cohort using stored specimens from 59 patients with newly diagnosed MM, and (2) a prospective cohort of 36 patients initiating new MM treatment. Several SASP factors were significantly associated with frailty after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index; GDF-15, TNF-RI, IL-6, and IL-8 showed positive correlations with both cumulative-deficit based and physical frailty indices. Additionally, significant age-adjusted associations were observed between SASP factors and treatment outcomes, including overall survival (OS), high-grade toxicity, and healthcare utilization. We developed a 5-factor SASP model that demonstrated superior predictive performance for OS compared to chronological age, R-ISS stage, and clinical frailty, and TNF-RI alone (5-year OS AUC: 0.90). These findings highlight the association between senescence biomarkers and frailty and OS, and support further investigation of SASP factors as objective frailty biomarkers in MM.

Abstract Background Multiple myeloma, the second most common hematologic malignancy, has witnessed incremental progress in its management over the past decade underscored by substantial improvement in patient outcomes, although it remains largely incurable. Due to its relapsing-remitting course with current therapies, patients experience considerable burden, particularly with the use of parenteral regimens that are administered on a continuous basis. As such, exploration of newer oral, finite-duration therapeutic options may be of benefit. Selinexor, an oral selective exportin (XPO)-1 inhibitor has an established synergistic activity with other antimyeloma therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors. In combination with dexamethasone, selinexor is currently approved at 80 mg twice a week dose, and in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone, it is approved at 100 mg once weekly dose for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Herein, we present the results of Arm B of the 2-arm SCOPE trial that examined an all-oral regimen of selinexor, pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (SPd) regimen for RRMM. Methods The SCOPE trial is an investigator-initiated, single arm, phase 2 study that assessed the efficacy and safety of selinexor (S), 60 mg orally (PO) weekly, pomalidomide (P), 4 mg PO, days 1-21 and dexamethasone (d), 40 mg PO, weekly in 28-day cycles given for a fixed duration (total 18 cycles ) in patients who were exposed to up to 2 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, at least one of which included both a proteasome inhibitor and the immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide. Olanzapine, along with a 5-HT3 antagonist comprised the mandatory anti-emetic prophylactic regimen. The trial's primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), based on confirmed response, and the key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety of SPd. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2016 criteria were used for response assessment in addition to reporting of the minor response. The distribution of PFS and OS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5. Results At the data cutoff date (May 28, 2025), 28 of 29 enrolled patients with RRMM were evaluable. The median age at study entry was 67.5 years (range: 65-72 years). SPd was used as the first salvage regimen in 21% of patients, and the remaining 79% of patients had previously received 2 lines of therapy at study entry. All patients had previously been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, and 32% were dual refractory. Notably, 64% of patients had previously been exposed to the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, and 11% of patients were daratumumab-refractory. The median follow-up was 23.9 months (range: 2.9-38.8 months). The patients had received a median of 9 cycles of SPd (range:1-18 cycles), and at data cutoff, 36% of patients had completed all the planned 18 cycles of SPd. The ORR was 61% (95% CI:41-78) and the rate of measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) was 21%, CR 11%, very good partial response (VGPR) 18%, partial response (PR) 11% as the best response achieved. Additionally, 7% and 25% of patients had attained a minor response (MR) and stable disease (SD), respectively. The median PFS was 24 months [95% CI: 7.1– not-estimable (NE)] months, and the median DOR was not reached (NR). 2-year OS rate was 93%. The toxicity associated discontinuation rate was 7%, and no grade (Gd) 5 events or unexpected toxicities were encountered during treatment. Gd 3 or higher hematologic toxicities occurred in 43% [Gd 3/4 anemia (11%/0%), thrombocytopenia (14%/0%), neutropenia (25%/7%), lymphopenia (4%/4%)]. Gd 3+ non-hematologic toxicities occurred in 46% [Gd 3 /4 (%) infections (21%/0%), fatigue (4%/0%), nausea (7%/0%) and anorexia (0%/7%). No patients experienced Gd 3 or 4 diarrhea, vomiting or weight loss. Additional data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion Weekly selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective and safe, all-oral regimen for patients with RRMM who are previously exposed to a proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide. SPd regimen is currently being examined in an ongoing phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

Abstract Background Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity post- autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with favorable outcomes and may overcome the adverse impact of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs). However, as the definition of high risk evolves and MRD emerges as a key endpoint, understanding its prognostic value within individual HRCAs is critical for treatment guidance. Methods We retrospectively included patients with NDMM that underwent an ASCT between September 19, 2016, and October 19, 2023, and achieved MRD negativity on Day 100 post ASCT. The MRD testing was conducted using multiparameter flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 2x10. HRCAs were defined as del(17p), 1q21+ gain or amplification (1q21+), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) and del(1p) and rest were considered standard risk (SRCA). Patients were grouped by the number of HRCAs (0, 1, ≥2). An adaptation of the recently proposed International Myeloma Society (IMS)/International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) classification for high-risk disease (TP53 mutation unavailable) was also used. Progression-free survival (PFS), measured from stem-cell infusion to progression or death, was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology and compared using log-rank test. Results We identified 386 patients with MRD negativity post ASCT, of which 381 had cytogenetic data available for analysis. The median follow-up for the study cohort was 47.3 months (95% CI: 43.2-50). The median age at the time of ASCT was 65.7 (25.4-79.2) years and 58.3% patients were males. A total of 49% (n=189) patients had standard-risk cytogenetics, 31.4 % (n=121) harbored 1 HRCA, 15.3% (n=59) patients had two HRCAs and 3.1% (n=12) had 3 HRCAs. The individual HRCA by their prevalence were: 1q21+ in 35.5%(n=137), del(17p) in 14.3% (n=55), t(4;14) in 10.9% (n=42), t(14;16) in 5.4% (n=21), del(1p) in 4.2% (n=16), and t(14;20) in 1.04% (n=4) of patients. The most common double-hit lesions were1q21+ gain and/or amplification co-occurring with t(4;14) (33.9%, n=20) and del(17p) with 1q21+ (18.6%, n=11). Despite universal MRD negativity at Day 100, several HRCAs remained prognostically significant for PFS. Patients with del(17p) had worse 3-year PFS (71%) than those without (81%) [hazard ratio (HR)=1.85, 95% CI 1.11–3.07, p = 0.0172], though 3-year OS did not significantly differ at data cutoff (80% vs. 92%, p=0.1176). Presence of 1q21+ was associated with an inferior 3-year PFS (73%) compared to those without [84%, HR: 1.96 (95% CI: 1.25–3.06), p=0.0026], while 3-year OS was similar (88% vs. 91%, HR:1.33 p=0.36). Isolated 1q21+ had inferior PFS with comparable OS when compared to SRCA [3-year PFS of 82% vs. 88% respectively (HR:1.97, p=0.0177)]; 3-year OS was 91% vs. 94% (HR:1.38, p=0.44)]. Among 1q21+ patients, those with co-occurring HRCAs had a 3-year PFS of 66% vs. 81% for isolated 1q21+ (HR: 1.47, p=0.21). Patients with t(4;14) had worse 3-year PFS (64%) vs. 82% in non t(4;14) [HR 2.11(95% CI: 1.21-3.67) p=0.0064], and 3-year OS of 82% compared to 91% [HR 2.14 (95% CI: 1.02–4.49), p=0.038]. Isolated t(4;14) showed a 3-year PFS of 59% vs. 87% in standard-risk (p=0.06), and 3-year OS of 90% vs. 93% [HR 3.29, 95% CI 0.95–11.33, p = 0.06]. The presence of t(14;16), t(14;20), and del(1p) did not significantly affect 3-year PFS (all p>0.1), likely due to small subsets. When patients were grouped by the number of HRCAs, PFS declined with increasing cytogenetic complexity. Compared to standard risk, the 3-year PFS was 77% for 1 HRCA vs [HR = 2.11 (95% CI: 1.29–3.46), p = 0.0027], 67% for ≥2 HRCA [HR = 2.64 (95% CI: 1.53–4.57), p = 0.0005]. Maintenance therapy was used in 98% of patients. Patients with HRCAs received a doublet maintenance compared to SRCA (p<0.0001), even in MRD negative disease post ASCT. Conclusion In patients with certain HRCA, achievement of MRD negativity post-ASCT does not overcome the adverse impact of HRCA on PFS. In our cohort, patients with del(17p), t(4;14), or 1q21+ continued to exhibit significantly shorter PFS despite achieving MRD-negative status. These findings underscore the need for ongoing risk-adapted strategies even in patients with MM who attain MRD-negative state. The OS estimates are immature at this time.

Summary In 2014, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated the criteria for diagnosing myeloma and added three additional criteria to the traditional Calcium elevation, Renal impairment, Anemia, Bone disease (CRAB) criteria, called the Sixty % marrow plama cells, Light chain ratio >60, Mri demonstates lytic lesions (SLiM) criteria (clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥60%, involved to uninvolved free light chain ratio (FLCr) ≥100 and >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). We report on the outcomes of 30 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) where therapy was initiated solely based on SLiM criteria and compared them to a matched cohort of 60 patients whose myeloma‐defining event was CRAB. The SLiM cohort had a shorter median time to neutrophil (15 vs. 16 days, p = 0.049) and platelet (15 vs. 17 days, p = 0.0004) engraftment. The 36‐month overall survival (OS) was 100% in the SLiM group and 93.27% in the control group (95% CI 83.06%–97.42%), with a trend towards longer OS in the SLiM cohort ( p = 0.065). The 36‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) was 91.61% in the SLiM (95% CI 69.93%–97.87%) and 65.95% in the control group (95% CI 52.31%–76.53%). There was no difference in the PFS between the cohorts ( p = 0.414). ASCT is efficacious and safe in MM patients transplanted only due to SLIM criteria. Early intervention in this asymptomatic cohort did not appear to result in deeper responses or better PFS compared to outcomes in symptomatic patients.

Abstract Introduction: Immunotherapy is most likely to work in a setting of low tumor burden, making vaccine strategies attractive as maintenance therapy post autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is difficult to ascertain the effects of the vaccines from delayed responses to the transplant. A novel immunotherapeutic, APC8020 (Mylovenge), was studied as consolidation therapy after for MM post PBSCT (Mayo vaccine trial). Mylovenge is prepared from autologous antigen presenting cells, including dendritic cells, partially purified from an unmobilized leukapheresis product by gradient density isolation and then incubated for two days with autologous serum containing M protein obtained pretransplant. We report long term results of the Mayo vaccine trial compared retrospectively to a consecutive cohort of MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic during the same time period. Methods: The Mayo vaccine trial patients had transplants between July of 1998 and May of 2001. Using these cutoff dates we analyzed 151 total MM patients, 27 from the vaccine trial (9 newly diagnosed and 18 relapsed) and 124 from database (DB) (50 newly diagnosed patients and 74 relapsed). The median (range) of follow-up for alive patients in vaccine trial is 6.5 years (2.9 – 8), and in the DB is 7.1 years (6 – 8). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests and stratified log rank tests (with newly diagnosed or relapsed as the stratum) were used to compare baseline patient characteristics and time to event distributions (overall survival – OS, progression free survival – PFS, and time to progression – TTP) between the two groups. Results: The median (range) of age in vaccine trial and DB was 56 (30–69) and 57 (36–71) years respectively. There were no significant differences in the known prognostic factors including PCLI, B2M, and CRP. The median (95% confidence interval - CI) TTP for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.6 years (1.3 – 1.8); stratified log rank p value = 0.46. The median (95% CI) PFS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.5 years (1.1 – 1.8), stratified logrank p value = 0.30. The median (95% CI) OS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 5.3 years (4.0 -N/A), and 3.4 years (2.7 – 4.6); stratified logrank p value = 0.02. Conclusions: Despite the fact that no difference was seen in TTP or PFS, post-transplant vaccine therapy was associated with prolonged survival. This is similar to what has been reported in other tumor systems including prostate cancer and glioblastoma multiforme. This approach warrants further investigation, including preclinical studies aimed at optimizing the immune response and randomized trials to define the role of vaccine therapy in myeloma. Figure Figure

Background: Despite development of new therapies and advances in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), MM remains, for the most part, an incurable condition. Allogeneic HSCT, through induction of a graft-versus-myeloma effect, can potentially overcome resistance to conventional therapy and induce prolonged disease control. Such approach is limited by the risk of acute and chronic GVHD and the high treatment-related mortality and has been restricted to young patients with aggressive or refractory disease. We reviewed our experience with allogeneic HSCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Methods: Retrospective single-institution review of consecutive allogeneic transplants performed for multiple myeloma between 1991 and 2006. Results: Thirty-three patients underwent a myeloablative (52%) or reduced-intensity conditioning (48%) HSCT 3.2 months to 15 years after their diagnosis of multiple myeloma (n=31) or plasma cell leukemia (n=2). Median age at the time of HSCT was 48 years (range 33–61) and 19 patients (57%) had received one (n=12) or two (n=7) prior autologous HSCT. Donors were HLA-matched siblings in 25 cases (76%), matched unrelated (n=8), and 5/6 (n=1) and 6/6 (n=1) match, non-sibling family members. Source of HSC was peripheral blood exclusively in 21 (64%) and bone marrow in 12 (35%) transplants. Outcomes are being reported after a median follow up of 21.8 months (25.6 for survivors). Day+100 mortality was 21.2% and the incidences of any grade and grades 3/4 acute GVHD were 54.5% and 33.3% respectively. Among the 26 patients surviving beyond day+100, 57.7% developed chronic extensive GVHD. All 6 patients transplanted after a complete response (CR) to prior therapy remained so after the transplant. Of the 27 patients with measurable disease, disease reassessment could be performed for 20 after the transplant. Ten patients (50%) achieved a CR or near-CR and 8 patients (40%) obtained a partial response. Median time to progression and overall survival (Figure) after HSCT were 21.8 and 40.6 months respectively. Twenty-one patients have died, 10 as a consequence of disease progression. Twelve patients are alive, including 6 patients in CR, 8.3 to 172.7 months after the transplant. In a multivariate model the use of a non-sibling donor and peripheral blood HSC were associated with decreases risk of relapse, but had no effect on overall survival. Conclusion: Allogeneic HSCT is a feasible treatment for young patient with adverse disease features. Graft-versus-myeloma can induced myeloma eradication and prolonged disease control. Figure Figure