Tagoug, Inès

Abstract Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD) are a backbone therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Despite their efficacy, most patients develop resistance, and the mechanisms are not fully defined. Here, we show that IMiD responses are directed by IMiD-dependent degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 that bind to enhancers necessary to sustain the expression of MYC and other myeloma oncogenes. IMiD treatment universally depleted chromatin-bound IKZF1, but eviction of P300 and BRD4 coactivators only occurred in IMiD-sensitive cells. IKZF1-bound enhancers overlapped other transcription factor binding motifs, including ETV4. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing showed that ETV4 bound to the same enhancers as IKZF1, and ETV4 CRISPR/Cas9-mediated ablation resulted in sensitization of IMiD-resistant MM. ETV4 expression is associated with IMiD resistance in cell lines, poor prognosis in patients, and is upregulated at relapse. These data indicate that ETV4 alleviates IKZF1 and IKZF3 dependency in MM by maintaining oncogenic enhancer activity and identify transcriptional plasticity as a previously unrecognized mechanism of IMiD resistance. Significance: We show that IKZF1-bound enhancers are critical for IMiD efficacy and that the factor ETV4 can bind the same enhancers and substitute for IKZF1 and mediate IMiD resistance by maintaining MYC and other oncogenes. These data implicate transcription factor redundancy as a previously unrecognized mode of IMiD resistance in MM. See related article by Welsh, Barwick, et al., p. 34. See related commentary by Yun and Cleveland, p. 5. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 4

Abstract Background: Immunoglobulin (IGH, IGL, IGK) and non-immunoglobulin (PVT1, TXNDC5, FAM46C, DUSP22, etc.) enhancers hijacking by variable genes (MYC, MAF, MAFB, CCND1/2/3, MMSET, IRF4) is a recognized oncogenic driver event in MM. However, the identity of the transcription factors (TFs) or transcriptional regulatory complexes binding and regulating the activity of these enhancers remains to be fully elucidated and may yield valuable therapeutic targets. As such the discovery of the BET family member BRD4 as the master histone acetyl mark reader at enhancers loci regulating MYC lead to promising therapeutic developments in MM and numerous other cancers. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) promote the proteasomal degradation of IKAROS (IKZF1) and AIOLOs (IKZF3) leading to the transcriptional repression of MYC and the suppression of MM cells survival and proliferation. However, acquired resistance to IMIDs and the loss of the transcriptional repression of MYC are nearly universal and occur in spite of sustained IKZF1/3 degradation suggesting that transcriptional rewiring may be sustaining hijacked enhancers activity and transcription of driver oncogenes. Methods and Results: In order to define how IMiDs repress MYC transcription, we first defined IKZF1, BRD4, the lysine acetyl transferase P300 and the mediator complex subunit MED1 mapping within the MM genome using ChIPseq. In MM cell lines (MM1S, RPMI8226, ARP1 and AMO1), IKZF1 predominantly mapped to intronic and intergenic loci which are typically enriched with enhancer and superenhancer elements. Indeed, IKZF1 mapping to the genome nearly completely (96.5%) overlapped that of P300, MED1 and BRD4 co-occupied enhancer and superenhancer loci. We also confirmed that in the MM1S sensitive cell lines IMiDs (lenalidomide 10 μM, 24h) exposure efficiently depleted IKZF1, BRD4, P300 and MED1 at enhancer loci with ensuing MYC (and MAF) downregulation. In contrast, in resistant cell lines (RPMI8226) and in spite efficient IKZF1 displacement, BRD4, P300 and MED1 were retained at the oncogenic enhancer (IGLL5) driving MYC (and MAF). These findings lead us to postulate that in IMiDs resistant cells retention of BRD4 and MED1 at oncogenic enhancers in the absence of IKZF1 likely results from rewiring of the TFs regulating MYC. To identify TFs that may co-localize with BRD4 and IKZF1, we analyzed the enrichment of DNA motifs at IKZF1and BRD4 co-occupied enhancers using the MEME suite motif-finding algorithms. This computational analysis revealed a strong enrichment at these MM enhancers of the GGAA motif recognized by the ETS family of TFs (P= 3.2 e-743) and other motifs boxes for the RUNX (P= 9.6 e-725), MYC/MYB ( P= 8.8 e-52) and interferon regulatory (IRF) (P= 3.1 e-293) TFs. We next confirmed that the ETS family TF ETV4 was indeed expressed in IMiDs resistant, but not sensitive, MM cell lines. ChiPseq occupancy profiles in IMiDs resistant RPMI8226 cell line revealed co-localization of ETV4 with IKZF1, P300 and BRD4. As predicted, lenalidomide treatment induced global depletion of IKZF1 but not ETV4 at BRD4 occupied enhancers in resistant cell lines (RPMI8226 and ARP1). Importantly, Cas9-mediated knock out of ETV4 in RPMI8226 cells sensitized them to lenalidomide with ensuing MYC downregulation and cell death. Confirming its role in MM, ETV4 transcript was indeed detectable in primary patients' samples in the CoMMpass data repository (ETV4 FPKM >1.0 in 112/724) and its expression was associated with significantly reduced survival outcomes (HR 0.64; P=0.0008). Similarly, high expression (top quartiles) of RUNX2 or MYB, TFs with enriched motifs at IKZF1 co-occupied enhancer loci, was also associated with decreased survival. Of note RNAseq analysis of paired patient samples pre- and post-IMiDs treatment (n=14 pairs) revealed significant upregulation of ETV4 at the time of acquired IMiDs resistance (7/14). Lastly transcriptome analysis of 101 patients enrolled in the RD arm (lenalidomide and dexamethasone) of the POLLUX trial (NCT02076009) confirmed the reduced survival of patients with top quartiles expression of ETV4 as well as MYB and RUNX2 (Fig.1) Conclusion: Transcriptional plasticity with expression of extra-lineage TFs such as the ETS family member ETV4 sustains oncogenic enhancers in MM overcoming IKAROS and AIOLOS dependency and promoting IMiDs resistance. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Neri: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Soong: Jannsen: Employment. Chiu: Janssen: Employment. Bahlis: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: MYC rearrangement is a recurrent somatic event in MM and results in super-enhancers repositioning within 3Kb (centromeric or telomeric) of the MYC locus. BRD4, a member of the bromodomain family, binds H3K27Ac and regulates enhancers activity, RNA polymerase II transcription initiation and elongation and in particular it regulates MYC transcription in MM cells. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) promote the proteasomal degradation of IKZF1/3 and the transcriptional repression of MYC and IRF4. However the exact mechanisms through which IMiDs downregulate MYC are not well understood. Methods and Results: Using a extended panel of 12 MM cell lines we have first confirmed our previous observartion that IMIDs universally degraded IKZF1/3, however unlike in IMiDs-sensitive cell lines it failed to downregulate MYC in resistant cells. Therefore, this finding suggests that MYC transcriptional regulation rather than IKF1/3 degradation is the "bottleneck" in IMiDs anti-myeloma activity or resistance. In addition, RNA-seq of paired and serially collected primary myeloma cells with acquired resistance to IMIDsconfirmed the enrichment of genes signatures associated with MYC at the time of acquired resistance. Of note, in a library of t(4;14) MM cell lines lenalidomide significantly downregulates FGFR3 while the expression of WHSC1 was not affected. As in t(4;14) cells FGFR3 is driven by the 3' IGH enhancer while WHSC1 is under the control of the intronic Em enhancer, and in view of the known role of IKZF1 in CSR, we posit that IKZF1 regulates plasma cells enhancer activity and hence MYC expression. To validate this hypothesis we first established the genome-wide distribution of IKZF1 in MM1S, RPMI8226 and OPM2 cells by ChIP-Seq. This analysis revealed the distribution of IKZF1 across the genome, predominantly to intronic an intragenic loci with only ~ 8% or reads mapping within +/- 5 kb of genes TSS. Importantly IKZF1 was also enriched at known myeloma cells enhancers or super-enhancers such as IGLL5, TXNDC5, BCL2L1, and DUSP22. We also mapped BRD4 binding to the genome in 8226 and MM1S cell lines and confirmed previously described mapping to known B-cell enhancers. Of note IKZF1 nearly universally overlapped with all BRD4 enhancers and superenhancers loci. These findings lead us to propose that IKZF1 depletion in response to IMiDs treatment will result in enhancer destabilization and displacement of BRD4 from enhancer loci. Indeed, Chip-Seq analysis of IKZF1 and BRD4 genomic distribution pre- and post- treatment with lenalidomide (10 uM for 4 or 8h) in IMiDs sensitive cell lines significantly depleted IKZF1 and BRD4 at superenhancer loci. In contrast, in IMiDs resistant cell lines (RPMI8226) and despite IKZF1 depletion, BRD4 was largely retained at these loci. These findings suggest that in IMiDs sensitive cells, IKZF1 is the major transcription factor mediating BRD4 recruitment to enhancer and superenhancer loci. In contrast, in IMiDs resistant cells and similar to BET-bromodomain inhibitor (JQ1) resistance, transcriptional plasticity or hyper-phosphorylation of BRD4 attributable to the phosphatase PP2A inactivation may also be mediating IMiDs resistance. Indeed the levels of p-BRD4 determined by western blotting were significantly higher in IMiDs resistant INA6 and RPMI8226 cells compared to MM1S cells. Furthermore, treatment of INA6 cells with the PP2A activator phenothiazine significantly sensitized INA6 cells to lenalidomide. Lastly, in order to investigate whether IMiDs resistance was associated with acquired new MYC rearrangements with an "IKZF1_resisant enhancer," we performed mate-pair sequencing of IMiDs resistance patients (18 post acquisition of IMIDs resistance and 7 pairs of pre- and post- acquisition of IMIDs resistance). MYC structural rearrangements (indels, translocations, inversions) were detected using DELLY and MANTA. Of note several MYC rearrangement were identified including MYC duplication in 1 patient, MYC structural rearrangement (±3Kb of TSS) in 9 patients (enhancer partner: TXNDC5, IGHa2, NSMCE2, IGLL5) and a newly acquired IRF4-IGH a2 rearrangement in 1 patient with pre-existing MYC-IGLL5 rearrangement. Conclusion:We have demonstrated that IMIDs alter enhancer activity in myeloma cells by depleting IKZF1 / IKZF3 and disrupting BRD4 binding to enhancers and super-enhancers, stalling of RNA polymerase II and MYC transcription. Disclosures Neri: Celgene and Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bergsagel:Amgen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Bahlis:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: IMiDs are now recognized to promote the proteasomal degradation of IKZF1/3 and the transcriptional repression of MYC and IRF4. MYC locus rearrangement is a recurrent somatic event in MM and results in MYC repositioning near superenhancers (such as IGH@, IGL@ and others). The mechanisms of IMiDs-mediated downregulation of MYC in MM cells is not well understood, in particular it is unclear how IMiDs alter the activity of the super-enhancers driving MYC transcription. Methods and results: Transcriptome analysis (RNAseq) of MM cells (OPM2 and MM1S) treated with lenalidomide or upon the silencing of IKZF3 (lentiviral delivery of dox-inducible IKZF3 shRNA) confirmed the downregulation of MYC, IRF4 and among others the upregulation of other genes of interest such as CD38, DKK1, PDL1, FOXO3 and a host of genes involved in interferon response. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) confirmed the enrichment of genes signatures associated with MYC as well as the interferon response. Notably, in t(4;14) MM cell lines we observed a significant downregulation of FGFR3 while the expression of WHSC1 was not affected. This finding was confirmed in a library of t(4;14) MM cell lines by qRT-PCR analysis. As FGFR3 is driven by the 3' IGH enhancer while WHSC1 is under the control of the intronic Em enhancer in t(4;14) MM cells, and in view of the known role of IKZF1/3 in class switch recombination, we postulated that IKZF1/3 regulate the 3' IGH enhancer activity and MYC expression in cells harbouring a MYC-IGH rearrangement. To validate this hypothesis we established the genome-wide distribution of IKZF1 in OPM2 and MM1S cells (both cell lines harbour an IGH-MYC rearrangement) by ChIP-Seq. Ikaros bound to 17660 loci of which 43% were associated with gene targets. Ikaros-binding motifs and other motifs such as STAT1, E2A, RUNX1 were also identified (MEME Tomtom and Jasper motif analysis) in the vicinity of Ikaros enrichment peaks. Importantly IKZF1 peaks also mapped to the IGH 3' enhancer loci and these results were confirmed by ChIP-PCR analysis. Of interest while no Ikaros peaks mapped to MYC (within 5 kb of TSS) by ChIP-seq, modest enrichment of Ikaros at MYC promoter was identified by ChIP-PCR in MM1S and KMS11 cells, and this enrichment was significantly attenuated by lenalidomide treatment. Since inhibition of MYC occurs as a consequence of depletion of the acetylated chromatin reader BRD4 at enhancers that drive MYC expression (Delmore et al., 2011), we examined the interaction between BRD4, IKZF1 and IMiDs treatment. Chip-Seq analysis revealed that BRD4 and IKZF1 are associated with most active enhancers and promoters in MM1S tumor cells. In particular, BRD4 and IKZF1 were enriched at the IGH 3'α2 enhancer locus. Importantly, treatment with lenalidomide (10μM, 4 hours), dramatically depleted IKZF1 and BRD4 enrichment at the 3' IGH enhancers (ChIP-PCR analysis). In contrast, treatment with the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 depleted BRD4, but not IKZF1 from the IGH 3' enhancer locus. These findings suggest that IKZF1 regulates BRD4 binding to the 3' IGH enhancers and explain the selective effect of IMiDs on MYC transcription in transformed cells harboring a MYC rearrangement. In addition, these results suggest that IMiDs will affect MYC expression only in cells were MYC is driven by an IKZF1/IKZF3 responsive enhancer. Lastly we sought to explain how IKZF1 may regulate BRD4 enrichment at H3K27Ac marks in super-enhancer loci. Since Ikaros is a known integral component of the NuRD (nucleosome remodelling and histone deacetylase) complex, we examined whether lenalidomide treatment and the ensuing Ikaros depletion lead to local gain of NuRD at MYC TSS and depletion of H3K27 acetylation. CHD4 (helicase subunit of the NURD complex) and H3K27Ac ChIP-PCR analysis revealed significant accumulation of the NuRD complex at MYC TSS as well as reduced H3K27Ac at 3'IGH enhancers after IMiDs exposure in MM1S and OPM2 cells. Importantly, CHD4 silencing abrogated lenalidomide induced MYC transcriptional repression and cell death. Conclusion: In summary, our studies suggest that Ikaros drives MYC expression in MM cells harbouring an IGH-MYC rearrangement by regulating the accumulation of the acetylated chromatin reader BRD4 at the IGH 3' enhancer and preventing the NURD complex mediated depletion of H3K27Ac marks at these enhancers. Our findings also explain the IKZF1/3 dependent mechanism of IMiDs-mediated MYC transcriptional repression. Disclosures Neri: Celgene: Research Funding. Duggan:Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Keats:Translational Genomic Research Institute: Employment. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy.