Back to Authors

Bearman, Scott I.

Mayo Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Citations 1

Intensive Dose-Dense Compared With High-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Operable Breast Cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup Study 9623
Bearman, Scott I., Lew, Danika L., Hudis, Clifford A. , Wolff, Antonio C. , Chew, Helen K. , Livingston, Robert B., Martino, Silvana, Moore, Halle C. F. , Green, Stephanie , Gralow, Julie R. , Barlow, William E. , Ingle, James N. , Elias, Anthony , Wolff, Antonio C

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 3, 2007 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1677-1682

10.1200/jco.2006.08.9383 Get It

Purpose Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)/Intergroup study 9623 was undertaken to compare treatment with an anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS) with a modern dose-dense dose-escalated (nonstandard) regimen including both an anthracycline and a taxane. Patients and Methods Participants in this phase III randomized study had operable breast cancer involving four or more axillary lymph nodes and had completed mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by HDC with AHPCS or to receive sequential dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide. The primary end point of this study was disease-free survival (DFS). Results Among 536 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the two arms for DFS or overall survival (OS). Estimated five-year DFS was 80% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) for dose-dense therapy and 75% (95% CI, 69% to 80%) for transplantation. Estimated 5-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 84% to 92%) for dose-dense therapy and 84% (95% CI, 79% to 88%) for transplantation. Conclusion There is no evidence that transplantation was superior to dose-dense dose-escalated therapy. Transplantation was associated with an increase in toxicity and a possibly inferior outcome, although the hazard ratios were not significantly different from 1.