Bashir, Yamima

Abstract Introduction: With approval of Daratumumab (Dara), targeting CD38 has become an attractive therapeutic option for various B cell cancers including WM. Using preclinical models of WM we investigated CD38 expression patterns, the impact of drug-resistance and the anti-WM effects of Dara, in vitro. An important aspect of our evaluation was the identification of optimal CD38 expression that correlates with maximal cytotoxic effects of Dara; such an approach has not been attempted previously in WM. Methods: WM cell lines (BCWM.1, MWCL.1 and RPCI.WM1) with isogenic proteasome inhibitor-resistant (CR, resistant to carfilzomib, bortezomib and ixazomib) and ibrutinib-resistant subclones (IR) were used. CD38 expression was measured by flow cytometry and a grading system was developed based on increasing CD38 MFI values with 1+= <50,000, 2+ = >50,000 and 3+ = >100,000. Daratumumab-induced specific lysis due to antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) or complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) was measured using the Calcein AM assay at an effector to target ratio (E:T) of 100:1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and complement-containing serum were obtained from healthy human donors. Daratumumab, carfilzomib and ibrutinib were obtained from commercial sources. Results: Expression of CD38 (MFI) was highest in RPCI-WM1 (91295.6) > BCWM.1 (13865.3) > MWCL-1 (9804.19) (Figure 1A.). Intriguingly we observed an interesting change in CD38 expression with induction of drug resistance; all CR clones showed a decrease in MFI (RPCI-WM1/CR; øMFI 55960.5 > MWCL-1/CR; øMFI 3890.0 > BCWM.1/CR; øMFI 1381), while decreased expression was noted in all IR clones except one (MWCL-1/IR; øMFI 6272.96, BCWM.1/IR; øMFI 3076 vs. RPCI-WM1/IR; _MFI 461784.6) (Figure 1B). When we applied our CD38 expression grading system, RPCI-WM1/IR cells classified as Grade 3+, RPCI-WM1 and its CR clones as Grade 2+, while all other WM cells were Grade 1+. We noted that utilization of this grading system was helpful in correlating the extent of cytotoxicity to the level of CD38 expression (Table 1). We next treated WM cells with Dara and observed direct lysis in only RPCI-WM1/CR (43%) > BCWM.1/CR (19%) and RPCI-WM1 (11%) cells. However, when Dara-treated WM cells were cocultured with PBMCs, significantly increased ADCC was noted in RPCI-WM1 (90.3%), RPCI-WM1/IR (88.3%) and RPCI-WM1/CR (68.0%) cells (Figure 1C). Although CDC has been reported as a mechanism of mAb-mediated cell death in WM our evaluation of CDC as a potential effector mechanism in daratumumab-treated WM was negative as expected, highlighting ADCC rather than CDC as the primary cytotoxic mechanism. Conclusion: Our analysis of CD38 in WM preclinical models highlights several important findings: 1.) Expression of CD38 changes as WM tumor clones evolve with induction of drug-resistance; an effect that may also be cell-type specific as evidenced by increased CD38 expression in RPCI-WM1/IR cells, 2.) Daratumumab can exert a direct lethal effect in WM cells but this effect is variable and cell line dependent, 3.) Expression of CD38 is an important factor directing cytotoxicity of Dara however antigen density appears to be an important factor and a grading system can be beneficial for future preclinical and/or clinical studies, 4.) ADCC and not CDC appear to be the prominent mechanism of action and 5.) ADCC-mediated cytolytic activity of Dara is contingent on CD38 expression as evidenced by the most specific lysis being noted in CD38 Grade 2+ and 3+ expressing WM cells (Table 1.). These observations can help direct optimal design of clinical studies with Dara in WM where drug resistance and CD38 expression should be further explored as factors contributing to the clinical efficacy of this new agent. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Ansell:BMS, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Celldex and Affimed: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Mitochondrial activity is critical to maintain a high cellular proliferation especially in drug-resistant clones. Ibrutinib-resistance (IR) in CLL is associated with highly aggressive clinical behavior, carrying a median survival of ~3 months. While these outcomes are not yet reported in WM, resistance to ibrutinib is foreseeable considering no WM patients achieve a complete remission with BTK inhibitors (reported series). The transition to a highly proliferative drive in the IR clone remains a biological dilemma and understanding this will allow rationale development of therapeutic strategies. It is established that increased cell proliferation is highly dependent on the functional capabilities of the mitochondria. Yet the respiratory proficiencies and adaptation of mitochondrial machinery in the IR state remains unknown. Here we interrogated mitochondrial function and its relevance in IR cells using our WM models. Materials: WM cell lines (BCWM.1, non-IR) and its isogenic IR clone (BCWM.1/IR; 20-fold resistant, without BTK or CXCR4WHIM-like mutations) were used. Mitochondrial respirometry was measured by Seahorse XF96 flux analyzer (Fig. 1a). Drug sensitivity and cytotoxicity were determined by Cell-Titer Glo cell viability assay. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on an Illumina HiSeq2000. Results: IR WM cells were noted to be in G1 arrest with altered morphologic features and growth kinetics. Despite growth arrest, IR cells showed increased basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR) (>30% increase) vs. parental (non-IR) cells. Consistent with this we observed enhanced mitochondrial ATP production suggesting increased mitochondrial utilization by the IR clones. We then measured maximal respiratory potential of WM cells with FCCP pre-treatment, which evaluates cellular potential to respond to increased ATP demand. We observed upregulation of mitochondrial spare respiratory capacity in BCWM.1/IR cells vs. parental BCWM.1 cell. In addition, a >50% increase in non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption/respiration was also noted (Fig.1b, c). To identify potential genomic changes that could explain mitochondrial overdrive, WES of the non-IR and IR cells was performed. Interestingly, this analysis did not uncover any mutational alterations in genes directing cellular oxidative phosphorylation (NDUF, COX1, COQ7, SURF1, etc.), glycolysis (PDK1, HK2, PKM2, ALDOA, etc.) or ATP production (ATP5, ND1, UCP1 and others). We then asked if mitochondrial function impacts therapeutic potential of a specific drug (or a class of drug), focusing specifically on proteasome disruption. First, we observed that proteasome inhibition- independent of the site (20S vs. 19S), retained high cytotoxic potential, wherein IR cells showed exquisite sensitivity to proteasome disruption. Interestingly, VLX1570 (targets 19S proteasome) had a 2-fold lower IC50 in IR clones than its non-IR counterpart. Cell respirometry demonstrated that compared to parental cells, VLX1570 (500nM) treatment significantly (p<0.002) and rapidly (2hr) attenuated basal respiration in IR clones at concentrations half of those needed to achieve similar effects in BCWM.1 cells. A concomitant decrease in ATP production as well as spare respiratory capacity was observed at these time points/drug concentrations (significantly more evident than in BCWM.1 cells). While our focus was mitochondrial bioenergetics and its therapeutic relevance in drug-resistant WM, unexpectedly we observed for the first time, evidence that VLX1570 induces changes in mitochondrial bioenergetics as early as 2hrs leading to increased mitochondrial membrane permeability and cell apoptosis in 6-12hrs. Comparable observations were made with bortezomib (targeting 20S). Conclusions: This is the first report identifying the role of mitochondrial hyper-drive in WM cells with resistance to ibrutinib. Of note, enhancedmitochondrial bioenergetics in the IR state increased sensitivity to proteasome inhibition and this was independent of the site of disruption in the proteasome pathway. Although, WES findings alone were not sufficient in explaining mitochondrial overdrive noted in our system, ongoing analysis of various mitochondrial functions (Fig. 1d) at the gene expression, copy number and epigenetic level may elucidate the underlying biomechanics of mitochondrial disposition in IR WM cells. Disclosures Ansell: BMS, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Celldex and Affimed: Research Funding. Linder:Vivolux, Ab: Other: Shareholder. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.

Abstract Introduction. In comparison toCLL, single agent clinical efficacy of venetoclax (a Bcl-2 inhibitor; Bcl-2i) in multiple myeloma (MM) has been modest (ORR of ~12%; Kumar et al ASCO 2016). Clinical experience to date unequivocally directs towards a combination strategy in MM for venetoclax. Our prior work has demonstrated that interaction between tumor and stromal cells upregulates phospho-Bcl-2 (pBcl-2, more stable than Bcl-2) which undermines activity of Bcl-2i. We also noted that this can be overcome using agents such as lenalidomide, which can impair the protective effect of stromal cells. Our goal in this investigation was to determine if the antitumor effect of lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) regimen can be further optimized through leveraging the Bcl-2 targeting properties of venetoclax thereby sensitizing MM cells to enhanced lethality. Given the known effects of Ld on activating host immune effector cells, we hypothesized that immune mediated cytotoxicity (engaged by Ld) can be further enhanced through concurrent treatment with venetoclax. Data presented here provides preclinical rationale and proof-of-principle for clinical development of Bcl-2i in combination with Ld. Methodology. Malignant plasma cell cancer models (MM1.S, BCWM.1, KMS11) and stromal cell line (HS5) were used. Bcl-2 and pBcl-2 were determined by flow cytometry. Drug cytotoxicity was determined by MTS assay and/orAnnexin-V/PI staining. SCID mice were used for xenograft studies. Bcl-2 inhibitors (venetoclax; Bcl-2 specific inhibitor, AT-101; pan Bcl-2 inhibitor) as well asLd were purchased from commercial sources. Results. Tumor cell lines were treated with Bcl-2i for 24hrs and showed significant loss of viability (51 - 68%) and induction of apoptosis (~40%) in vitro. To replicate microenvironment conditions, we co-cultured tumor and stromal cells for 48hrs followed by treatment with Bcl-2i (1uM). Under these conditions, we noted a significant reduction in apoptosis (~50%) in Bcl-2i-treated cells indicating the protective effect of the stroma (Fig.1a). Under similar settings, we examined Bcl-2 species in tumor cells +/- stromal cells. The ratio of pBcl-2:Bcl-2 in tumor cells without stromal contact was 0.7, whereas, the ratio increased to 1.8 when tumor and stromal cells were cocultured suggesting increased pBcl-2 as a protective mechanism (Fig.1b,c). We then investigated the potential of Ld (1uM) +/- Bcl-2i to downregulate pBcl-2:Bcl-2 and whether this correlated with increased tumor lethality. While solo Bcl-2i treatment of tumor + stromal cells downregulated pBcl-2 and Bcl-2 (ratio 1.5), a marked reduction was noted in Ld + Bcl-2i treated tumor cells (ratio of 0.3). And this correlated with enhanced tumor cell apoptosis; analogous to that observed in tumor cells without stroma (Fig.1a and c). As these experiments indicated the triple combination to overcome protective effects of the stroma through decreasing bioavailability of pBcl-2 in vitro, we next validated these observations in a xenograft model. MM1.S cells were subcutaneously implanted in SCID mice with local tumor growth monitored by caliper measurement and systemic dissemination measured by Human-Ig lambda levels. DMSO-treated mice demonstrated tumors averaging ~410mm3 by Day 24 post-tumor implantation, whereas mice treated with Bcl-2i (35mg/kg QD, oral gavage) or Ld alone (Len 10mg/kg QD; Dex 0.5mg/kg QD, IP injection) showed tumors ~330mm3. In Ld + Bcl-2i- treated mice, tumor size was ~250mm3- significantly lower than DMSO (p<0.001) or Bcl-2i orLd group mice (p<0.054) (Fig.1d). A similar trend was seen when systemic Human-Ig-lambda was measured (Fig.1e). Notably, mice tolerated the triple combination treatment well; with no significant weight loss or other toxicities noted. Conclusions. Regulation of the Bcl-2 pathway is an important approach for controlling tumor cell proliferation; most recently validated with the approval of venetoclax for treatment of CLL. Herein we demonstrateLd as an attractive partner regimen to enhance the effects of not only Bcl-2i but also that ofLd in MM. Ongoing work is investigating the combination ofLd + venetoclax and preliminary in vitro results in venetoclax-insensitive MM cells (IC50 >5uM) show significant apoptosis induction with combination therapy (Fig.1f). Altogether our studies provide the rationale for clinical evaluation of this combination platform (Len/Dex + Bcl-2i). Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.