Weigel, Brenda J.

AbstractBackgroundInhibition of the WEE1 kinase by adavosertib (AZD1775) potentiates replicative stress from genomic instability or chemotherapy. This study reports the pediatric solid tumor phase 2 results of the ADVL1312 trial combining irinotecan and adavosertib.MethodsPediatric patients with recurrent neuroblastoma (part B), medulloblastoma/central nervous system embryonal tumors (part C), or rhabdomyosarcoma (part D) were treated with irinotecan and adavosertib orally for 5 days every 21 days. The combination was considered effective if there were at least three of 20 responses in parts B and D or six of 19 responses in part C. Tumor tissue was analyzed for alternative lengthening of telomeres and ATRX. Patient's prior tumor genomic analyses were provided.ResultsThe 20 patients with neuroblastoma (part B) had a median of three prior regimens and 95% had a history of prior irinotecan. There were three objective responses (9, 11, and 18 cycles) meeting the protocol defined efficacy end point. Two of the three patients with objective responses had tumors with alternative lengthening of telomeres. One patient with pineoblastoma had a partial response (11 cycles), but parts C and D did not meet the protocol defined efficacy end point. The combination was well tolerated and there were no dose limiting toxicities at cycle 1 or beyond in any parts of ADVL1312 at the recommended phase 2 dose.ConclusionThis is first phase 2 clinical trial of adavosertib in pediatrics and the first with irinotecan. The combination may be of sufficient activity to consider further study of adavosertib in neuroblastoma.

Abstract Introduction: Tegavivint is a first in class small molecule inhibitor of Wnt-ß-catenin signaling that functions by disrupting the interaction of ß-catenin and TBL1/TBLR1 resulting in degradation of nuclear ß-catenin. Aberrant Wnt signaling has been identified as a key mechanism of cancer biology, resulting in uncontrolled transcription of pro-oncogenic Wnt target genes. Pre-clinical in vivo studies of tegavivint demonstrated anti-tumor activity in a variety of pediatric solid tumors, including osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and lymphoma. Methods: We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation study of single agent tegavivint in children aged ≥12 months to ≤21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors including lymphoma and desmoid tumors. The dose escalation was conducted using a rolling six design starting with the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in adults, 5 mg/kg, administered intravenously over four hours on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. A single de-escalation to 4 mg/kg and escalations to 6.5 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg if pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters indicated were planned. Once the RP2D is defined a PK cohort and phase 2 cohorts including Ewing sarcoma, desmoid tumor, osteosarcoma, liver tumors, Wilms tumor and a disease agnostic cohort including cancers with Wnt alterations will be evaluated. Results: A total of 15 patients were enrolled on the phase 1 part of the study. Two patients were not treated due to pre-therapy DEXA scan demonstrating grade 1 osteoporosis; therefore, 13 patients received treatment with tegavivint on 2 dose levels (5 mg/kg and 6.5 mg/kg). The median age of treated patients was 16 years (range 3-21). Patient diagnoses included desmoid tumor (5), Wilms tumor (3), and one each of Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, CIC::DUX4 sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. There were no dose limiting toxicities among 4 DLT-evaluable patients at DL1 and 6 at DL2. The maximum tolerated dose was not determined. Grade three or higher adverse events at least possibly related to treatment included anemia (2) and lymphopenia (2). A single patient had a grade 3 QT prolongation requiring cessation of tegavivint after cycle 3. At 5 mg/kg, the mean AUC was 94,900 hr*ng/mL (range 52,000-136,000), and at 6.5 mg/kg was 91,200 hr*ng/mL (range 28,400-144,000). The pediatric RP2D dose was determined to be 6.5 mg/kg based on the pre-specified objective of achieving pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations and less than 20% difference in mean AUC between the two tested dose levels. Conclusions: Tegavivint is well tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors, the pediatric RP2D is 6.5 mg/kg demonstrating pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations. The study is currently enrolling patients to a pharmacokinetic expansion cohort and will then proceed to phase 2. Citation Format: Sarah B. Whittle, Joseph G. Pressey, Xiaowei Liu, Charles G. Minard, Kristina Z. Denic, Joel M. Reid, Stacey L. Berg, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J. Weigel. PEPN2011: a phase 1/2 study of tegavivint in children, adolescents, and young adults with recurrent or refractory solid tumors, including lymphomas and desmoid tumors: a report from the pediatric early phase clinical trials network [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT090.

Background Cyclin D has been shown to play an essential role in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) initiation and progression, providing rationale for targeting the CDK4/6-cyclin D complex that regulates cell cycle progression. Procedure The Children’s Oncology Group AINV18P1 phase 1 trial evaluated the CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, in combination with standard four-drug reinduction chemotherapy in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B- and T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma. Palbociclib (50 mg/m 2 /dose) was administered orally once daily for 21 consecutive days, first as a single agent (days 1-3) and subsequently combined with reinduction chemotherapy. This two-part study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) followed by an expansion pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort. Results Twelve heavily pretreated patients enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for toxicity. One dose-limiting hematologic toxicity (DLT) occurred at the starting dose of 50 mg/m 2 /dose orally for 21 days. No additional DLTs were observed in the dose determination or PK expansion cohorts and overall rates of grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were comparable to those observed with the chemotherapy platform alone. Five complete responses were observed, two among four patients with T-ALL and three among seven patients with B-ALL. Pharmacokinetic studies showed similar profiles with both liquid and capsule formulations of palbociclib. Conclusions Palbociclib in combination with reinduction chemotherapy was well tolerated with a RP2D of 50 mg/m 2 /day for 21 days. Complete responses were observed among heavily pretreated patients.

Abstract Background To determine outcomes of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with isolated lung metastases. Methods Data were analyzed for 428 patients with metastatic RMS treated on COG protocols. Categorical variables were compared using Chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests. Event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. Results Compared with patients with other metastatic sites ( n = 373), patients with lung‐only metastases ( n = 55) were more likely to be <10 years of age, have embryonal histology (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma), have N0 disease, and less likely to have primary extremity tumors. Lung‐only patients had significantly better survival outcomes than patients with all other sites of metastatic disease ( p < .0001) with 5‐year EFS of 48.1 versus 18.8% and 5‐year OS of 64.1 versus 26.9%. Patients with lung‐only metastases, and those with a single extrapulmonary site of metastasis, had better survival compared with patients with two or more sites of metastatic disease ( p < .0001). In patients with ERMS and lung‐only metastases, there was no significant difference in survival between patients ≥10 years and 1–9 years (5‐year EFS: 58.3 vs. 68.2%, 5‐year OS: 66.7 vs. 67.7%). Conclusions With aggressive treatment, patients with ERMS and lung‐only metastatic disease have superior EFS and OS compared with patients with other sites of metastatic disease, even when older than 10 years of age. Consideration should be given to including patients ≥10 years with ERMS and lung‐only metastases in the same group as those <10 years in future risk stratification algorithms.

Abstract Purpose: In many cancers, nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab improves response rates compared with either agent alone, but the combination has not been evaluated in childhood cancer. We conducted a phase I/II trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in children and young adults with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods: ADVL1412, Part C assessed safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab at two dose levels (DL): DL1 1 mg/kg of each drug and DL2 3 mg/kg nivolumab plus 1 mg/kg ipilimumab. Part D evaluated response at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Part E tested DL3 (1 mg/kg nivolumab plus 3 mg/kg ipilimumab) in Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Tumor response was measured using RECIST v1.1. Pharmacokinetics and PD-L1 expression on archival tissues were assessed. Results: Fifty-five eligible patients enrolled. Based on safety, tolerability, and similar drug exposure to the same doses administered in adults, DL2 was defined as the pediatric RP2D. Among 41 patients treated at the RP2D, 2 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1, and 4 patients experienced toxicities beyond that period. Two patients had clinically significant sustained partial responses (1 rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 Ewing sarcoma) and 4 had stable disease. Among 8 patients treated at DL3, 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred, all immune-related adverse events; no objective responses were observed. Conclusions: The RP2D of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) is well tolerated in children and young adults with solid tumors and shows some clinical activity. Increased dose of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus nivolumab (1 mg/kg) was associated with increased toxicity without clinical benefit.

10022 Background: nab-Sirolimus (formerly know ABI-009 and nab-rapamycin) is a novel human albumin-bound preparation of sirolimus, a potent mTOR inhibitor. We report results of a Phase I study of ABI-009 alone and in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide in children with relapsed/refractory solid or CNS tumors. Methods: Patients (age 1-21 years) with relapsed/refractory solid or CNS tumors were eligible. Using a rolling 6 design, ABI-009 was administered intravenously as a single agent on Days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 (cycle = 21d), then subsequent cycles ABI-009 was administered in combination with temozolomide (125 mg/m2/dose, maximum 250 mg/dose) orally once daily x 5 on Days 1-5 and irinotecan 90 mg/m2/dose orally once daily x 5 on Days 1-5. Three dose levels (DL) of ABI-009 were investigated (DL1: 35mg/m2/dose, DL-1: 20mg/m2/dose, and DL-2: 15mg/m2/dose). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) was established based on dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observed during Cycle 1 and 2. At the RP2D, additional patients were enrolled for pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: 33 patients were enrolled (32 eligible and 1 ineligible); 11 did not experience DLT but were not evaluable for toxicity due to progressive disease or physician decision to discontinue protocol therapy prior to completion of cycle 2; 17 [median age 13 (2-20) years] were evaluable for determination of MTD during dose escalation, 6 were enrolled on the PK cohort, of which 3 were evaluable to toxicity. At DL1, 2/5 patients experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia during cycle 1 (n = 1) and cycle 2 (n = 1)); at DL-1, 2/6 patients experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia in cycle 1); at DL-2, 1/6 patients experienced DLT (thrombocytopenia in cycle 1). PK expansion enrolled at DL-2 and 1/3 participants evaluable for toxicity had a DLT (mucositis). Overall, at DL-2, 2/9 patients (22%) had DLT. One patient with Ewing Sarcoma had a partial response and remained on study for 35 cycles; Patients (one each) with Ewing Sarcoma, Wilms Tumor, and Pineoblastoma had stable disease, ranging from 3-6 cycles. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia was dose limiting for ABI-009 alone and in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan. The MTD for ABI-009 is 15mg/m2/dose days 1 and 8 in combination with 5 daily doses of temozolomide 125 mg/m2/dose and oral irinotecan 90 mg/m2/dose. One patient had a partial response, 3 patients had prolonged stable disease. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are pending and will inform future trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02975882.

AbstractBackgroundChildren with diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) have a dismal prognosis. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is an orally available, blood-brain barrier penetrant, Wee1 kinase inhibitor. Preclinical efficacy against DIPG is heightened by radiation induced replication stress.MethodsUsing a rolling six design, 7 adavosertib dose levels (DLs) (50 mg/m2 alternating weeks, 50 mg/m2 alternating with weeks of every other day, 50 mg/m2, then 95, 130, 160, 200 mg/m2) were assessed. Adavosertib was only given on days of cranial radiation therapy (CRT).The duration of CRT (54 Gy over 30 fractions; 6 weeks) constituted the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period. Endpoints included tolerability, pharmacokinetics, overall survival (OS) and peripheral blood γH2AX levels as a marker of DNA damage.ResultsA total of 46 eligible patients with newly diagnosed DIPG [median (range) age 6 (3–21) years; 52% female] were enrolled. The recommend phase 2 dose (RP2D) of adavosertib was 200 mg/m2/d during days of CRT. Dose limiting toxicity included ALT elevation (n = 1, DL4) and neutropenia (n = 1, DL7). The mean Tmax, T1/2 and Clp on Day 1 were 2 h, 4.4 h, and 45.2 L/hr/m2, respectively. Modest accumulation of adavosertib was observed comparing day 5 versus day 1 AUC0-8h (accumulation ratio = 1.6). OS was 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.4, 12.5) and did not differ from historical control.ConclusionAdavosertib in combination with CRT is well tolerated in children with newly diagnosed DIPG, however, compared to historical controls, did not improve OS. These results can inform future trial design in children with high-risk cancer.

Abstract Introduction: Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS) penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the sole nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. Selinexor is FDA-approved for refractory multiple myeloma and DLBCL and has been evaluated in a phase 1 trial in children with leukemia. We report a phase 1 trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors, including lymphoma (NCT02323880). Methods: A rolling-six design was used to evaluate selinexor (10 or 25 mg tablets) administered twice or once weekly during a 28-day cycle. Dose determination was based on protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using CTCAEv4 during cycle 1. First dose pharmacokinetics (PK) were performed. Results: 43 subjects were enrolled (17 males); median (range) age was 15 (6-20) years. 27 (63%) had CNS tumors, most commonly high-grade glioma (n=12); 16 (37%) had extracranial solid tumors. 42 were evaluable for DLT. At the starting dose (35 mg/m2/dose, twice weekly), no DLTs were observed in 6 subjects, however, 2 subjects had unexpected late myelosuppression delaying initiation of cycle 2. The dosing schedule was amended to twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1 week break. 12 subjects received 35 mg/m2/dose; 4 experienced DLTs [grade 3 fatigue (n=2), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n=1), or grade 3 ALT increase (n=1)]. The dose was de-escalated to 20 mg/m2/dose, 3 weeks on, 1 week off. 12 subjects enrolled; 3 experienced a DLT [grade 3 increased AST/ALT, acute reversible neurologic changes, or neutropenia (each n=1)]. At the 20 mg/m2 (n=12) and 35 mg/m2 (n=19) dose levels, respectively, the mean ± SD Cmax (ng/ml) was 324±116 and 535±174, and AUC (hr•ng/ml) was 3092 ± 842 and 5156 ± 1227. This was comparable to PK in adults receiving 35 and 50 mg/m2. Based on a desire to achieve a higher Cmax and avoid breaks in schedule, and emerging evidence for similar effectiveness with decreased toxicity in adults receiving continuous once weekly dosing, we evaluated a dosing schedule with once weekly dosing for all 4 weeks of each cycle. At the initial dose level (45 mg/m2 weekly), 2 of 6 subjects had DLTs [prolonged grade 2 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 seizure in a primary CNS tumor patient]. Six subjects received 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly; 1 DLT [grade 3 thrombocytopenia] was observed. Non-dose-limiting toxicity (Grade ≥2 occurring in &gt;10% of subjects during cycle 1) included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. Subjects received a median (range) of 1 (1-9) cycle; 13 received 2-3 cycles, and 6 received 5-9 cycles. Conclusions: Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematological and gastrointestinal. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 20 mg/m2/dose twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by one week off. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD and recommended phase 2 starting dose of selinexor is 35 mg/m2/dose. Citation Format: Adam L. Green, Charles G. Minard, Xiaowei Liu, Joel M. Reid, Kerice Pinkney, Stephan Voss, Marvin D. Nelson, Elizabeth Fox, Brenda J. Weigel, Julia Glade Bender. Phase 1 trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent/refractory solid and CNS tumors (ADVL1414): A Children’s Oncology Group Phase 1 Consortium trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P162.

10019 Background: Pevonedistat (PEV), a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE), prevents the activation of Cullin-RING ligases (CRL) necessary for proteasome mediated degradation of key regulatory proteins important in cell survival. In adults with solid tumors, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with chemotherapy is 20-25 mg/m2. Antitumor activity of PEV has been demonstrated in preclinical models of childhood cancer. In vivo additive activity has been demonstrated for PEV in combination with IRN and alkylating agents. The objectives of this study are to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose of PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ and describe the toxicities, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) properties of this combination. Methods: We conducted a phase 1 trial of PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients (pts) with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and brain tumors. During cycle 1, PEV was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100mg/m2), on days 8-12 of a 28 day cycle. In subsequent cycles, PEV was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN and TMZ on days 1-5 of a 21 day cycle. Dose escalation was determined using the Rolling 6 Design. Results: 30 pts enrolled. All pts were eligible and evaluable for cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment. Median (range) age was 13 (1-21) years; 19 (63%) were male. Eleven pts had brain tumors, and 19 pts had solid tumors. Six pts each enrolled on PEV dose levels (DL) 1 (15mg/m2), 2 (20mg/m2), 3 (25mg/m2) and 4 (35mg/m2) as well as an expanded PK cohort at DL4. Cycle 1 grade 3/4 toxicities include lymphopenia (n = 5), leukopenia (n = 4), neutropenia (n = 2), elevated ALT (n = 2), elevated AST (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), flu-like symptoms (n = 1). The most frequent non-dose limiting AEs in cycle 1 were anemia (87%), WBC decreased (77%), nausea (57%), diarrhea (53%), ALT increased (50%), AST increased (50%), and vomiting (50%). PK analyses showed the mean area under the curve at the 25 mg/m2 dose level on day 8 (in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide) was 1300 hr•ng/mL, half-life (T ½) was 5-6 hours, time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 1 hour, and mean clearance was 20 L/hr/m2. There were 3 DLTs, 2 of which were related to protocol therapy (diarrhea and thrombocytopenia), among 12 patients on DL4. Thus the MTD was not exceeded at any dose level. PK at the 25 mg/m2 dose level are comparable to those in adult patients. PK from the 12 patients on DL4 (35mg/m2) as well as responses of all patients are pending. Conclusions: PEV in combination with IRN and TMZ is well tolerated in children with solid or brain tumors. PEV PK was not altered by the addition of irinotecan and temozolomide. Further PK and PD analyses are ongoing to establish the recommended phase 2 dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03323034.

10018 Background: Outcomes for children with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML and MDS are poor and new therapies are needed. Pevonedistat is an inhibitor of the NEDD-8 activating enzyme, a key regulator of the ubiquitin proteasome system that is responsible for protein turnover, cell growth and survival. In preclinical models, pevonedistat was synergistic with cytarabine (AraC) and azacitidine (aza). The combination of pevonedistat + aza in adults with AML demonstrated improved responses compared to either single agent. We evaluated the feasibility, toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pevonedistat in combination with aza, fludarabine, AraC (Aza-FLA) in children with R/R AML and MDS. Methods: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m2, IV days 1, 3, 5, the recommended adult dose, was administered in combination with aza (75 mg/m2, days 1-5), fludarabine (30 mg/m2, days 6-10), and AraC (2000 mg/m2, days 6-10). Intrathecal AraC was administered at the start of therapy and additional doses given to patients with CNS leukemia. If < 33% of the initial 6 enrolled patients experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1 the regimen would be considered tolerable and 6 additional patients could enroll to further assess tolerability and PK. Pevonedistat PK was determined during cycle 1 following doses 1 and 5. Response was evaluated after cycle 1. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled, median age was 13 years (range 1-21). All patients received prior chemotherapy, median number of prior regimens was 2 (range 1-5) and 3 (25%) patients had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Diagnoses were AML NOS (n = 10, 83%), acute monocytic leukemia (n = 1), and therapy related AML (n = 1). One of the initial 6 patients had DLTs (hypertension, GGT elevation, and proteinuria); pevonedistat 20 mg/m2 + Aza-FLA was considered tolerable. Six additional patients were enrolled, two had DLTs (weight loss, hypoxia). Overall, 3/12 (25%) of patients experienced DLTs. As expected, using the intensive Aza-FLA backbone, myelosuppression, electrolyte abnormalities, and hepatic transaminase elevation were common. Day 1 PK parameters (n = 12, mean±SD) were: Cmax= 223±91 ng/mL, AUC0-24h= 892±216 ng/hr/mL, T1/2=4.3±1.2 hours, CL = 23.2±6.9 L/hr/m2. PK parameters were similar following doses 1 and 5, for patients < 12 (n = 6) and ≥ 12 (n = 6) years, and to adult PK profiles. Ten patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 30% (95% CI: 7,75) with 3 patients achieving a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Conclusions: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m2 combinedwith Aza-FLA was tolerable in children with R/R AML. The toxicity of the regimen was similar to other intensive AML regimens. PK parameters were similar among the two age groups and were comparable to adults. Within the confines of a phase I study, there was limited anti-leukemic activity of the combination of pevonedistat +Aza-FLA in R/R AML. Clinical trial information: NCT03813147.