Hauri, Peter

The widespread use of actigraphy has led to the recognition that a number of methodological issues have to be addressed to facilitate an increased acceptability of this relatively new method. These methodological issues include actigraph placement, reliability, and sensitivity, and the phenomenon known as the “first night effect.” Our findings have demonstrated that actigraphy is a reliable instrument for assessment of sleep and wakefulness. In addition, actigraph placement and reliability do not constitute a significant methodological problem as no differences were found in all of these studies. We have also observed no first-night effects associated with sleep-wake monitoring with actigraphy.

Decades of empirical observations have established the validity of actigraphy primarily in individuals without sleep disorders. Methodological problems encountered thus far coupled with the widespread use of actigraphy signal the need for concentrated efforts to establish a consensus regarding scoring procedures. Currently available scoring methods show less reliability in clinical populations. To address these issues two validation studies were conducted: one for individuals without sleep disorders and the other for patients diagnosed with insomnia. The results of these two studies using the Actigraph Data Analysis Software as the scoring method have shown that the described system is fairly precise. It can be used for actigraphs with different features and mode of operation and is applicable to individuals with insomnia. These findings corroborate previous research showing that actigraphy is a valid instrument for assessment of sleep and wakefulness.

The authors measured ambient illumination exposure in healthy volun teers in San Diego, California (latitude 32° 43' N, n = 30), and Rochester, Minne sota (latitude 44° 1'N, n = 24), during each of the four quarters of the year, which were centered on the solstices and equinoxes. Subjects wore photosensors on their wrists and lapels (or foreheads while in bed) 24 h per day for an average of 5-6 days per quarter. The maximum of the two illumination readings was stored each minute. Annual average time spent per day in outdoor illumination (≥ 1000 lux) was significantly higher in San Diego than it was in Rochester (p <.04). Daily durations of illumination at or exceeding thresholds of 1,10,100,1000, and 10,000 lux were highly seasonal in the sample as a whole (p < .01 at 1 lux, p < .0001 at other thresholds). Seasonal variation in outdoor illumination was far more pronounced in Rochester than it was in San Diego (interaction p < .001) but remained significant in San Diego ( p ≤ .03). Seasonal variation in indoor illumi nation was generally similar in the two cities. The median Rochester subject experienced illumination ≥ 1000 lux for 2 h 23 min per day during summer and 23 min per day during winter. The corresponding times in San Diego were 2 h 10 min and 1 h 20 min. Neither age nor gender predicted illumination duration at any level. Both season and geographic location strongly influenced human illumination exposure, and behavior (choice of indoor vs. outdoor environment) was the most important mediating factor.