Valeri, Anthony M.

Abstract Background Coexistence of fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) in the same kidney biopsy (FGN–IgAN) is rare, and the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of this dual glomerulopathy are unknown. Methods In this study, 20 patients with FGN–IgAN were studied and their characteristics were compared with 40 FGN and 40 IgAN control patients. Results Concurrent IgAN was present in 1.8% of 847 consecutive FGN cases and was the second most common concurrent glomerulopathy after diabetic nephropathy. FGN–IgAN patients were overwhelmingly White (94%) and contrary to FGN patients were predominantly (60%) males. Compared with IgAN patients, FGN–IgAN patients were older, had higher proteinuria, a higher incidence of renal insufficiency, and a lower incidence of microhematuria and gross hematuria at diagnosis. Six (30%) patients had malignancy, autoimmune disease or hepatitis C infection, but none had a secondary cause of IgAN or clinical features of Henoch–Schonlein purpura. Histologically, all cases exhibited smudgy glomerular staining for immunoglobulin G and DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 (DNAJB9) with corresponding fibrillary deposits and granular mesangial staining for IgA with corresponding mesangial granular electron-dense deposits. On follow-up (median 27 months), 10 of 18 (56%) FGN–IgAN patients progressed to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), including 5 who subsequently died. Serum creatinine at diagnosis was a poor predictor of renal survival. The proportion of patients reaching ESKD or died was higher in FGN–IgAN than in IgAN. The median Kaplan–Meier ESKD-free survival time was 44 months for FGN–IgAN, which was shorter than IgAN (unable to compute, P = 0.013) and FGN (107 months, P = 0.048). Conclusions FGN–IgAN is very rare, with clinical presentation and demographics closer to FGN than IgAN. Prognosis is guarded with a median renal survival of 3.6 years. The diagnosis of this dual glomerulopathy requires careful evaluation of immunofluorescence findings, and electron microscopy or DNAJB9 immunohistochemistry.

Abstract Abstract 3992 Little is known about the rare entities of heavy and light chain amyloidosis (AHL) and heavy chain amyloidosis (AH). In this study, we report the renal and hematologic characteristics, pathology, and outcome of 17 patients with renal AH/AHL including 5 with AH (4 IgG and 1 IgA) and 12 with AHL (7 IgGλ, 3 IgAκ, 1 IgAλ, and 1 IgMλ), and compare them with 202 patients with renal AL amyloidosis (AL) diagnosed during the same time period. All cases were diagnosed by kidney biopsy that showed Congo red-positive deposits. Amyloid typing was done by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry (LMD/MS) (12 patients) or by immunofluorescence (5 patients). All patients with renal AH/AHL were Caucasians, with a M:F ratio of 2.4 and a median age at biopsy of 63 years. Compared with patients with renal AL, those with renal AH/AHL had less frequent concurrent cardiac involvement, higher likelihood of having circulating complete monoclonal Ig, lower sensitivity of fat pad biopsy and bone marrow biopsy for detecting amyloid, higher incidence of hematuria, and better patient survival. The hematologic and renal responses to chemotherapy were comparable to renal AL. In 42% of patients, AH/AHL could not have been diagnosed without LMD/MS. In conclusion, renal AH/AHL is an uncommon but under-recognized form of amyloidosis, and its diagnosis is greatly enhanced by the use of LMD/MS for amyloid typing. The accurate histological diagnosis of renal AH/AHL and distinction from AL may have important clinical and prognostic implications. Table 1. Demographics and hematologic characteristics AH/AHL AL p value No. of patients 17 202 Gender: Male/female 12/5 (71%/29%) 126/76 (62%/38%) 0.61 Age, median (range) 63 (50–77) 62 (36–86) 0.73 Additional organ involvement 8 (47%) 126 (62%) 0.3 Cardiac involvement 3 (18%) 100 (50%) 0.01* % of plasma cells in bone marrow, median (IQR) 8 (5–15) 6 (5–10) 0.82 ≥30 plasma cells 4 (24%) 11/198 (6%) 0.02* Positive SPEP/SIF for paraprotein 15 (88%) 158/200 (79%) 0.53 Presence of whole monoclonal protein on SPEP 14 (82%) 108/200 (54%) 0.04* Positive UPEP/UIF for paraprotein 13/16 (81%) 158/189 (84%) 0.73 Presence of whole monoclonal protein on UPEP 10/16 (63%) 61/189 (32%) 0.03* Abnormal serum FLC ratio (<0.26 or >1.65) 9/12 (75%) 150/188 (80%) 0.71 Markedly abnormal FLC ratio (< 0.125 or > 8) 5/12 (42%) 100/188 (53%) 0.55 Positive bone marrow for amyloid 6/16 (38%) 135/183 (74%) 0.004* Positive fat pad biopsy for amyloid 2/14 (14%) 105/145 (72%) <0.001* IQR, interquartile range. Table 2. Renal characteristics at kidney biopsy AH/AHL AL p value No. of patients 17 202 24h urine protein in g, median (IQR) 5.1 (3.2–9.0) 6.0 (3.2–10.0) 0.9 Full nephrotic syndrome 9/16 (56%) 132/197 (67%) 0.42 Serum albumin in g/dl, median (IQR) 2.7 (2.2–3.3) 2.5 (1.9–2.9) 0.29 % albuminuria on UPEP, median (IQR) 68 (61–72) 70 (60–76) 0.47 Serum creatinine in mg/dl, median (IQR) 1.4 (1.1–2.1) 1.2 (0.9–1.8) 0.25 Serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dl 10/16 (63%) 92/201 (46%) 0.3 eGFR, median (IQR) 47 (27–67) 58 (36–75) 0.29 Decreased eGFR 10/16 (63%) 103/201 (51%) 0.44 Microscopic hematuria 9/16 (56%) 44/169 (26%) 0.02* IQR, interquartile range. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.