Paulsen, Athena

Abstract Abstract 349 Failure to collect enough CD34+ cells following poor hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization is generally thought to be due to marrow damage following previous therapies. However, marrow damage alone cannot account for all poor mobilizations since there are donors who have good marrow cellularity but fail to adequately mobilize. In addition, the relationship between CD34+ cell dose and engraftment rate is not linear, suggesting other factors play a role during engraftment. Previous animal studies suggest CD8+ T cells are important for CD34+ cell homing to the marrow. We hypothesized that CD8+ T cells have dual roles by inhibiting CD34+ cell mobilization and facilitating engraftment. To test our hypothesis, we followed 192 autologous HPC donors to assess the role of CD8+ T cells in HPC mobilization and engraftment. The median donor age was 58.5 years (range 18 – 76), and 110 of the 192 patients were males. Donors were diagnosed with plasma cell disease, primarily multiple myeloma, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CD34+ and CD8+ T cell content in the patients' apheresis products were enumerated using flow cytometry, quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry. The median CD34+ cell/kg was 4.7 × 106. Patients were categorized as low, moderate or high mobilizers according to their total CD34+ cell collection quartile distribution: <3.7, 3.8 – 5.5 and ≥5.6 × 106/Kg respectively. We found that HPC products from low mobilizers contained significantly more CD8+ T cells (median 1.25 × 108/Kg) than HPC products from moderate and high mobilizers (Table 1 p = 0.04). Therefore, the ratio of CD8+ T cells to CD34+ cells was 4 – 8 folds higher in low mobilizers than in moderate and high mobilizers. Moreover, CD8 antigen expression measured using qPCR, normalized with 18s ribosomal RNA, was significantly higher in low mobilizers than in moderate or high mobilizers. Similar analysis with CD4+ T cells did not demonstrate significant correlation with mobilization. To assess the role of CD8+ T cells in HPC mobilization, we purified CD8+ T and CD34+ cells from both low and moderate or high mobilizers. Using chemotaxis assay, we assessed the effect of CD8+ T cells on CD34+ cell migration away from high stromal cell derived factor (SDF1-a) concentrations. Purified CD34+ cells were plated in bone marrow epithelial cell coated trans-wells and co-cultured with purified CD8+ T cells at 1:2 and 1:5 ratios in the presence of SDF-1a at 0, 200 and 400ng/ml concentrations. Cells that migrated through the micro-pores of the trans-well into the lower wells were enumerated and analyzed. Our studies showed CD8+ T cells inhibit migration of CD34+ cells in-vitro independent of SDF1-a concentration. (Figure 1) The inhibitory properties of CD8+ T cells were more pronounced on CD34+ cells from low mobilizers than on CD34+ cells from moderate or high mobilizers. We also assessed if CD8+ cell content was associated with days to neutrophil engraftment. Our analysis showed the higher the CD8+ T cell content per unit CD34+ cell, the faster the rate of neutrophil engraftment. In summary, HPC products from low mobilizers contained significantly higher numbers of CD8+ T cells. CD8+ T cells, independent of SDF1-a concentration, significantly inhibited migration of purified CD34+ cells. In addition, CD8+ T cell content per unit CD34+ cell was inversely proportional to the time to neutrophil engraftment. These findings suggest CD8+ T cells may play dual roles by inhibiting CD34+ cell mobilization and facilitating its homing and engraftment. Table 1 Association of CD8+ T cell number with CD34+ cell mobilization capacity Mobilization Quartiles Low Moderate High p-value Median CD34+ Cell × 106/Kg 3.03 4.55 6.73 <0.001 Median CD8+ T cell × 108/Kg 1.25 0.50 0.33 0.04 CD8+ T: CD34+ cell ratio 41 11 5 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1184 Lenalidomide, a second generation immunomodulatory derivative of thalidomide, has demonstrated significant clinical benefit in myelodysplastic syndrome, multiple myeloma and B-cell malignancies. Its side effects include myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia, and impaired filgrastim induced stem cell mobilization in patients with myeloma. The precise mechanism of action of lenalidomide on hematopoietic and bone marrow microenvironment remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the effect of lenalidomide on survival, lineage commitment and differentiation of normal purified CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) were obtained from a normal allogeneic stem cell donor with an informed consent, and were subjected to positive selection with the EasySep magnetic cell selection system to purify CD34+ cells (purity of 95%). Unsorted and CD34- accessory cells were used as controls. To assess the direct cytotoxic and proliferative effect of lenalidomide on purified CD34+ cells, lenalidomide (Celgene, NJ) was dissolved in DMSO and was diluted in culture medium to final concentration of 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 μM. Purified CD34+, CD34- and unsorted cells were plated in triplicates at a density of 2×104/mL in serum-free StemSpan® medium supplemented with growth factors and cytokines. 24 hours after plating the cells, lenalidomide or 0.1% DMSO as control was added. 72 hours following treatment, cells were counted with Beckman coulter counter and phenotypically analyzed using Accuri C6 flow-cytometer. The percentage of viable cells was determined using 7AAD staining. While no difference in viability was noted in the treated vs. untreated purified CD34+ cells, the viability of CD34- cells and unsorted cells was reduced to 30% and 40% respectively by lenalidomide. Contrary to our assumption, lenalidomide, in a dose dependant manner, induced proliferation of purified CD34+ cells. Maximal increase in proliferation was observed between 1mM and 10mM concentrations. The rate of growth plateaued beyond the 10mM concentration and 100mM concentration appeared to have no additional effect. At the peak of growth (10mM), the cell count nearly tripled. (Fig. 1) Lenalidomide appeared to be cytotoxic to CD34- and unsorted cells in a dose dependant manner. At 100mM concentration, the CD34- cell proliferation dropped by 4 fold and the unsorted cells by 7 fold. To examine the effect of lenalidomide on the clonogenic potential of purified CD34+ cells, 2,000 cells were seeded onto MethoCult® media (Stem cell technologies) supplemented with growth factors and cytokines. Cells were cultured in the presence of lenalidomide (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM) or 0.1 % DMSO as control. BFU-E, CFU-GM and CFU-mix were scored on day 14 with the use of an inverted microscope and standard morphological criteria. Significance of difference between groups was determined by student's t test for paired samples. Lenalidomide induced a significant increase in clonogenic activity of CD34+ cells (148 ± 27 colonies per 103 CD34+ cells, p = 0.01), most evident at the dose of 10 μM with enhanced formation of BFU-E (102 ± 23/ per 103 CD34+ cells, p = 0.01) but demonstrated no significant impact on CFU-GM (36 ± 14 per 103 CD34+ cells, p = 0.83) compared to control. (Fig. 2) This study demonstrates that lenalidomide has pronounced effects on both CD34+ and CD34- components of mobilized PBPCs. It enhances the proliferative and clonogenic potentials of CD34+ cells with lineage commitment towards erythroid differentiation. It also has cytotoxic activity towards CD34- cells. It is likely that neutropenia and impaired mobilization of stem cells in patients treated with lenalidomide is mediated via its impact on CD34- accessory cells in the bone marrow microenvironment. Further studies exploring the impact of lenalidomide on normal bone marrow stromal cells, T and NK cell mediated signaling are needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.