Kawkgi, Omar El

Abstract Introduction: Anti-thyroid Drugs (ATD) have become the most frequently used treatment for Graves’ disease (GD) in the United States. However, the response to this therapy is variable. Factors that predict biochemically responsive vs. biochemically persistent disease remain unknown. Identifying predictors of disease poorly responsive to ATD can help guide treatment decision making, follow up planning and prognosis. Methods: From a database of patients with GD treated with ATD and receiving care at an academic medical center between 2009–2019, we selected adults with incident GD treated with ≥14 days of ATD. Results: 172 patients (from a database of 730 patients with GD on ATD) were sampled for the purpose of this pilot and 97 of these met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median age of 50 (18–90); female, 70.1%; never smokers, 64.9%; median goiter size of 40 g (15–100); and median TRAb on presentation of 8.1 mIU/L (1.0- 60). Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) was present in 13.4% at baseline. Patients (100%) were started on methimazole at a median dose of 20 mg (2.5–60). The median time from presentation until biochemical improvement (defined as the first instance of FT4 ≤1.7 ng/dL) was 120.9 days (18–1525), and to biochemical euthyroidism (normal TSH & FT4) was 251 days (41–1259) including a median of 3 (0–17) dose adjustments. In a univariate analysis, response to ATD was divided into two groups; biochemically responsive and biochemically persistent disease (based on reaching biochemical improvement in ≤6 months, or >6 months respectively). Biochemically persistent disease was more common in those with GO at presentation (38.5% vs.11.1%) (p .024). There was a trend towards greater prevalence of biochemically persistent disease in those with TRAb ≥ 8.0 mIU/L (46.2% vs. 27.8%) (p .204), and goiter estimated 30 grams or above by physical examination (30.8% vs. 19.4%) (p .460). Biochemically responsive disease was associated with higher frequency of hypothyroidism during treatment (p .047). Conclusion: Our preliminary results illustrate the spectrum of response to ATD and predictors of biochemically persistent disease. We aim to expand this analysis utilizing a large database. As use of ATD increases, clinicians and patients can apply this data to estimate response to therapy, and identify patients that may require more aggressive therapy, thereby tailoring management plans.

Abstract Background: It is estimated that 10-25% of patients with hypothyroidism use desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) as their primary thyroid hormone replacement medication, despite concerns about the risk of thyrotoxicosis associated with DTE use. It is unclear why many patients prefer the use of DTE as a thyroid hormone replacement formulation over guideline-concordant therapies such as levothyroxine (LT4). Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study by analyzing patient-reported information from patient online forums to better understand patient preferences for and attitudes toward the use of DTE to treat hypothyroidism. We searched the 10 most popular patient forums based on number of users (WebMD, Topix, Health questions, Patients like me, Drugs.com, Endocrine Web, Everyday Health, Talk Health Partnership, Spark People and Patients.info) using the key terms: desiccated thyroid extract, desiccated thyroid treatment, thyroid USP, commercial names of DTE (Armour Thyroid® or Natural Thyroid®), thyroid extract, AND hypothyroidism. Unique posts were retrieved from those websites between each forum’s inception to March 2018. From these posts, we extracted descriptive information on patient demographics and clinical characteristics and qualitatively analyzed posts’ content to further explore patient perceptions on DTE and other thyroid hormone replacement therapies. Results: Unique 1,235 posts were initially retrieved from the included patient forums. After the initial screening, we selected data from three of these forums (WebMD, Patients Like Me, and Drugs.com) based on the completeness of the available information (673 posts). Nearly half (45%) of patients reported that a clinician initially drove their interest in trying DTE. Patients described many reasons for switching from a previous therapeutic approach to DTE, including lack of improvement in symptoms (58%) and the development of side effects (22%). Among a majority of patients, DTE was described as moderately-to-majorly effective overall (81%) and more effective than the previous therapy (77%). The most frequently described benefits associated with DTE use were an improvement in clinical symptoms (56%) as well as a change in overall well-being (34%). One-fifth of patients described side effects related to the use of DTE. Qualitative analysis of posts’ content supported these findings and raised additional issues around the need for individualizing therapy approaches for hypothyroidism as well as difficulties obtaining DTE. Conclusions: Among patients with hypothyroidism, a subset may prefer DTE over guideline-concordant therapies for many reasons, including perceived effectiveness, despite the risks associated with DTE. Future work should incorporate patient-reported outcomes to better elucidate the mechanisms responsible for therapy preferences in this subset of patients.

Background and objectives: It is unclear why many patients with hypothyroidism prefer the use of desiccated thyroid extract (DTE) as a thyroid hormone replacement formulation over levothyroxine (LT4) treatment, as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. We analyzed patient-reported information from patient online forums to better understand patient preferences for and attitudes toward the use of DTE to treat hypothyroidism. Materials and Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study by evaluating the content of online posts from three popular hypothyroidism forums from patients currently taking DTE (n = 673). From these posts, we extracted descriptive information on patient demographics and clinical characteristics and qualitatively analyzed posts’ content to explore patient perceptions on DTE and other therapies further. Results: Nearly half (46%) of the patients reported that a clinician initially drove their interest in trying DTE. Patients described many reasons for switching from a previous therapeutic approach to DTE, including lack of improvement in hypothyroidism-related symptoms (58%) and the development of side effects (22%). The majority of patients described DTE as moderately to majorly effective overall (81%) and more effective than the previous therapy (77%). The most frequently described benefits associated with DTE use were an improvement in symptoms (56%) and a change in overall well-being (34%). One-fifth of patients described side effects related to the use of DTE. Qualitative analysis of posts’ content supported these findings and raised additional issues around the need for individualizing therapy approaches for hypothyroidism (e.g., a sense of each patient has different needs), as well as difficulties obtaining DTE (e.g., issues with pharmacy availability). Conclusions: Lack of individualized treatment and a feeling of not been listened to were recurrent themes among DTE users. A subset of patients may prefer DTE to LT4 for many reasons, including perceived better effectiveness and improved overall well-being, despite the risks associated with DTE.