Leonard, L M

Abstract Background Bicarbonate stability in serum depends on time, exposure to air, temperature, tube size and sample volume. With implementation of Cobas Connection Module (CCM) automation, the workflow for bicarbonate measurement needed to be re-evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine bicarbonate stability in filled 3.5 mL and 5 mL serum-separator tubes (SSTs) and capped and uncapped aliquot tubes on the CCM automation. Methods Bicarbonate was measured on a Cobas c701 (Roche Diagnostics) at various time points. SSTs (n=8) were centrifuged 6 min at 1649g ∼30 min post-collection. Serum was aliquoted (1 mL) into capped or uncapped tubes and kept ambient (15-25°C) on the CCM track for 0, 60, 90, 150, 180, 240 and 300 minutes (n=2 per time point). Primary SSTs (5mL n=4, and 3.5mL n=5) were uncapped on the CCM track and bicarbonate measured at baseline and 30 minute intervals through 6.5 hours. An absolute difference of +/- 4 mmol/L from baseline was considered acceptable. Results Bicarbonate concentrations decrease with time at rates dependent on whether the aliquot tube is capped or uncapped or the SST is 3.5 mL or 5 mL (Figure 1).Figure 1.Average decrease in bicarbonate concentration with time for capped aliquot tubes (black square), uncapped aliquot tubes (red circle), 3.5 mL serum separator tube (blue up triangle), 5 mL serum separator tube (green down triangle). Bars represent +/- 1SD. Conclusions Bicarbonate in serum is stable for testing for 2.5 hours in uncapped 1 mL aliquot tubes, 3.5 hours in capped 1 mL aliquot tubes, 3.5 hours in uncapped full 3.5 mL SST tubes and 6 hours in uncapped full 5 mL SST tubes at ambient temperatures (15-25°C). Bicarbonate testing can be accommodated by total laboratory automation but processes such as add-ons and retesting must be done with caution.

Abstract Background Thoroughly investigating single patient result errors may identify systemic, large-scale testing errors. The laboratory observed an event where a revision to a Total Bile Acid (TBA, Diazyme Laboratories, Inc.) patient result following a 22S quality control (QC) failure displayed a larger than expected difference (52 to 5mcmol/L). TBA is primarily used for diagnosis and monitoring of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with results >10mcmol/L considered elevated. Retrospective review of result revisions following QC failures (3/15/2017-5/30/2023) revealed that 50%(20/40) yielded result differences of >10mcmol/L(>20SD based on assay imprecision). The aim of this study was to apply a systematic approach to i) estimate the rate of TBA errors, ii) ensure accurate result reporting during investigation period, iii) perform root cause analysis (RCA), and iv) determine corrective and preventative action(s). Methods Residual samples from TBA testing (6/24-7/5/2023) were retested(n=158), differences >+/-3.0mcmol/L or 15% were confirmed on an alternate analyzer, and reports were revised. Automated repeat testing of TBA samples >10mcmol/L was operationalized 7/6/2023. Initial and repeat TBA results were compared(n=448) and results differing by >+/-20% were remeasured on an alternate analyzer. RCA was conducted using a fishbone diagram. NaOH reagent probe washes were implemented for TBA and the error rate was re-assessed. Assays run prior to TBA samples with errors (n=15) were identified. To assess reagent carryover a residual serum pool (TBA ∼5mcmol/L) was aliquoted into 5 tubes in a sample rack. The first sample in the rack was programmed to run an assay suspected of causing carryover followed by 4 TBA measurements. Mean±standard deviation(SD) TBA concentrations were calculated. TBA was also measured in the liquid reagent for amylase, lipase, acetylcholinesterase (ACE) and fructosamine. Results Initial TBA retesting yielded no errors when initial TBA was ≤10mcmol/L(n=51). For samples with TBA >10mcmol/L(n=107), 9(8.4%) had differences exceeding criteria with 8/9 being revised to ≤10mcmol/L. Analysis of automated patient repeat data showed a 3.8%(17/448) error rate when initial TBA >10mcmol/L. After NaOH reagent probe washes were implemented, the error rate decreased to 0.7%(3/448). Assays run directly before an erroneously high TBA result included: lactate, fructosamine, soluble transferrin receptor(STFR), lipase, and ACE. A serum TBA pool(mean±SD=5.1±0.4 mcmol/L,n=15) measured 37.6±1.2mcmol/L(n=3) and 6.7±0.7mcmol/L(n=3) after lipase and fructosamine, respectively. No other assays demonstrated carryover. TBA in lipase reagent compartment B and C was 653 and 649mcmol/L, respectively, and 653mcmol/L in fructosamine reagent compartment B. Conclusions A single patient TBA result revision was investigated and led to identification of reagent carryover causing erroneously high TBA results on the Roche c502 analyzer. Automatic, real-time, repeat testing was implemented to prevent reporting incorrect patient results until RCA could identify the cause. Occurrence rate of erroneous high TBA results decreased from 3.8% to 0.7% after implementation of NaOH washes on the instruments. Carryover experiments confirmed that lipase and fructosamine assays cause carryover when run prior to a TBA sample due to measurable TBA in the reagent. The lab is pursuing moving the fructosamine and lipase reagent to the Roche Cobas c701 to prevent the issue.

Abstract Introduction Measurement of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) is used for the diagnosis and management of patients with diabetes. Methods for measuring HbA1C are classified on the basis of charge differences (cation exchange chromatography) or structural differences (boronate affinity chromatography). Some cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyzers may be prone to interferences from hemoglobin variants. Historically, our lab used two methods to report HbA1C results: cation exchange HPLC (VariantII) with reflex to boronate affinity HPLC (Ultra2) methods. A new analyzer (BioRad D-100) with improved interference detection and thresholds for interference was evaluated. The objectives of this study were (1) assess the comparability of HbA1c results between D-100, VariantII, and Ultra2; (2) evaluate the need for maintaining a reflex method; and (3) calculate cancellation rates before and after implementing D-100. Methods HbA1c was measured by cation exchange methods using VariantII Turbolink, D-100 (BioRad), and boronate affinity using Ultra2Affinity (Trinity Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations with the following analytical measuring ranges (AMRs), 4.0% to 17.6%, 4.0% to 18.0%, and 4.0% to 17.6%, respectively. D-100 was compared to VariantII (n = 26) and Ultra2 (n = 31) using residual patient samples from provider-ordered HbA1c having no chromatography flags and with the following chromatography flags on VariantII (n = 113): variant window (n = 41), HbA1c <4.0% (n = 24), HbA1a + HbA1b >5% (n = 19), HbF >5% (n = 9), P3 >10% (n = 6), HbA1c >17.6% (n = 4), unknown peak (n = 3), labile 5% to 15% (n = 3), labile >15% (n = 3), and HbS >60% (n = 1). The cancelation rates were calculated at baseline (January 1-31, 2018) and postimplementation of D-100 (September 20, 2018, to January 22, 2019). Results HbA1c results from D-100 were within ±0.3 or 5% with the following frequencies: Ultra2 in 96.2% (25/26) with VariantII in 96.8% (30/31) using samples with no chromatography flags. A total of 113 samples with abnormal VariantII flags were tested using D-100 with 82% (n = 92) not exceeding interference limits for result reporting. These D-100 results were within ±0.3 or 5% of Ultra2 results with the following frequencies: 38.5% (10/26) of samples below (n = 23) or above (n = 3) the AMR, 85.3% (29/34) of results with Hb variant flags, 68.0% (17/25) with unknown/minor peaks, and 71.4% (5/7) with HbF <15%. The clinical concordance was also assessed according to the following decision limits: normal <5.6%, prediabetic = 5.7% to 6.4%, and diabetic >6.5%. Results were concordant in 88% with variant peaks (12/13 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 8/11 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 10/10 w/HbA1c >6.5%), 84% with minor peaks (5/6 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 0/2 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 16/17 w/HbA1c >6.5%), and 86% with HbF (3/3 w/HbA1c <5.6%, 2/3 w/HbA1c = 5.7%-6.4%, 1/1 w/HbA1c >6.5%). Results above/below AMR had 100% concordance (>16.0% or <4.4%). The frequency of VariantII rule violation was 2.1% in January 2018, with 53 of 117 having results confirmed as <4.0% or >16.0% by Ultra2, 2 of 117 reported by Ultra2, and 62 being cancelled due to HbF >15% (n = 23) or variant Hb >60% (n = 39). The frequency of rule violation using only D-100 since implementation was 2.2%. Conclusion Implementation of D-100 has removed the need for boronate affinity reflex testing and maintained similar cancellation rates.