Back to Authors

Bombard, Yvonne

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-4539

Mayo Clinic

University of Toronto

Citations 4

Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare
Allyse, Megan , Agam, Preya , Bombard, Yvonne , Feys, Roel , Horstmann, McKenna , Kokayi, Assata , Isasi, Rosario , Meagher, Karen M. , Michie, Marsha , Musunuru, Kiran , Ormond, Kelly E. , Yap, Jane Q. , Allyse, Megan A , Riggan, Kirsten A , Yap, Jane Q , Meagher, Karen M , Riggan, Kirsten A.

The American Journal of Bioethics | February 24, 2025 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 11-25

10.1080/15265161.2025.2457713 Get It

Translational Justice in Human Gene Editing: Bringing End User Engagement and Policy Together
Allyse, Megan , Meagher, Karen M. , Michie, Marsha , Isasi, Rosario , Ormond, Kelly E. , Bonhomme, Natasha , Bombard, Yvonne , Howard, Heidi , Musunuru, Kiran , Riggan, Kirsten A. , Rubeck, Sabina , Allyse, Megan A , Meagher, Karen M , Riggan, Kirsten A

The American Journal of Bioethics | June 20, 2023 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 55-58

10.1080/15265161.2023.2207513 Get It

Shared Decision Making in the Care of Patients With Cancer
Shickh, Salma , Leventakos, Konstantinos , Lewis, Mark A. , Montori, Víctor M. , Montori, Victor M , Bombard, Yvonne

American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book | June 20, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 43 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/edbk_389516 Get It

Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care that is suitable for the care of patients with cancer. It involves a collaborative conversation seeking to respond sensibly to the problematic situation of the patient, cocreating a plan of care that makes sense intellectually, practically, and emotionally. Genetic testing to identify whether a patient has a hereditary cancer syndrome represents a prime example of the importance for SDM in oncology. SDM is important for genetic testing because not only results affect current cancer treatment, cancer surveillance, and care of relatives but also these tests generate both complex results and psychological concerns. SDM conversations should take place without interruptions, disruptions, or hurry and be supported, where available, by tools that assist in conveying the relevant evidence and in supporting plan development. Examples of these tools include treatment SDM encounter aids and the Genetics Adviser. Patients are expected to play a key role in making decisions and implementing plans of care, but several evolving challenges related to the unfettered access to information and expertise of varying trustworthiness and complexity in between interactions with clinicians can both support and complicate this role. SDM should result in a plan of care that is maximally responsive to the biology and biography of each patient, maximally supportive of each patient's goals and priorities, and minimally disruptive of their lives and loves.
The Clinical Application of Gene Editing: Ethical and Social Issues
Ormond, Kelly E. , Bonham, Vence L. , Hoffman‐Andrews, Lily , Howard, Heidi , Isasi, Rosario , Michie, Marsha , Allyse, Megan , Allyse, Megan A , Bombard, Yvonne , Musunuru, Kiran , Riggan, Kirsten A.

Personalized Medicine | July 23, 2019 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 337-350

10.2217/pme-2018-0155 Get It