Back to Authors

Zia, Maryam

Mayo Clinic

John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County

Citations 3

Mixed histiocytic neoplasms: A multicentre series revealing diverse somatic mutations and responses to targeted therapy
Friedman, Joshua, Yabe, Mariko , Petrova‐Drus, Kseniya , Pulitzer, Melissa , Busam, Klaus J. , Rampal, Raajit K. , Ulaner, Gary A. , Reddy, Ryan , Yeh, Randy , Rotemberg, Veronica , Hershkovitz‐Rokah, Oshrat , Shpilberg, Ofer , Abeykoon, Jithma P. , Fidai, Shiraz , Gannamani, Vedavyas, Zia, Maryam, Panageas, Katherine S. , Rosenblum, Marc K. , Durham, Benjamin H. , Reiner, Anne S , Mazor, Roei D , Hershkovitz-Rokah, Oshrat , Goyal, Guarav , Abeykoon, Jithma P , Diamond, Eli L , Ulaner, Gary , Reiner, Anne S. , Doǧan, Ahmet , Francis, Jasmine H. , Hatzoglou, Vaios , Lacouture, Mario E. , Mazor, Roei David , Goyal, Gaurav , Go, Ronald S. , Rech, Karen L. , Morlote, Diana M. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Diamond, Eli L.

British Journal of Haematology | April 13, 2024 | Volume: 205 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 127-137

10.1111/bjh.19462 Get It

Summary Histiocytic neoplasms are diverse clonal haematopoietic disorders, and clinical disease is mediated by tumorous infiltration as well as uncontrolled systemic inflammation. Individual subtypes include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai–Dorfman–Destombes disease (RDD) and Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), and these have been characterized with respect to clinical phenotypes, driver mutations and treatment paradigms. Less is known about patients with mixed histiocytic neoplasms (MXH), that is two or more coexisting disorders. This international collaboration examined patients with biopsy‐proven MXH with respect to component disease subtypes, oncogenic driver mutations and responses to conventional (chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive) versus targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) therapies. Twenty‐seven patients were studied with ECD/LCH (19/27), ECD/RDD (6/27), RDD/LCH (1/27) and ECD/RDD/LCH (1/27). Mutations previously undescribed in MXH were identified, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non‐V600‐BRAF, RAF1 and a BICD2‐BRAF fusion. A repeated‐measure generalized estimating equation demonstrated that targeted treatment was statistically significantly (1) more likely to result in a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) (odds ratio [OR]: 17.34, 95% CI: 2.19–137.00, p = 0.007), and (2) less likely to result in progression (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03–0.23, p < 0.0001). Histiocytic neoplasms represent an entity with underappreciated clinical and molecular diversity, poor responsiveness to conventional therapy and exquisite sensitivity to targeted therapy.
Trends and Inpatient Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism-Related Admissions in Patients with Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Katiyar, Vatsala , Uprety, Alok, Mendez-Hernandez, Andres , Andrade-Gonzalez, Xavier , Zia, Maryam, Fuentes, Harry E , Fuentes, Harry E

TH Open | July 17, 2019 | Volume: 03 | Issue: 03 | Pages: e203-e209

10.1055/s-0039-1692988 Get It

Background Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (MF), have a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aim to determine the trends in annual rates of VTE-related admissions, associated cost, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality in patients with MPN. Methods We identified patients with PV, ET, and MF from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2006 to 2014 using ICD-9CM coding. Hospitalizations where VTE was among the top-three diagnoses were considered VTE-related. We compared in-hospital outcomes between VTE and non-VTE hospitalizations using chi-square and Mann–Whitney U-test and used linear regression for trend analysis. Results We identified 1,046,666 admissions with a diagnosis of MPN. Patients were predominantly white (65.6%), females (52.7%), with a median age of 66 years (range: 18–108). The predominant MPN was ET (54%). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between groups (VTE: 3.4% vs. non-VTE: 3.2%; p = 0.12); however, VTE admissions had a longer LOS (median: 6 vs. 5 days; p < 0.01) and higher cost (median: VTE US$32,239 vs. 28,403; p ≤ 0.01).The annual rate of VTE admissions decreased over time (2006: 3.94% vs. 2014: 2.43%; p ≤ 0.01), compared with non-VTE–related admissions. Conclusion In our study, VTE-related admissions had similar in-hospital mortality as compared with non-VTE–related admissions. The rates of hospitalizations due to VTE have decreased over time but are associated with a higher cost and LOS. Newer risk assessment tools may assist in preventing VTE in high-risk patients and optimizing resource utilization.