Back to Authors

Fothergill, Annette W.

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center

Citations 3

Multilaboratory Evaluation of In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes for ME1111
Ghannoum, Mahmoud A. , Diekema, Daniel J. , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Rennie, Robert , Walsh, Thomas J. , Wengenack, Nancy L. , Fothergill, Annette W., Wiederhold, Nathan P. , Chaturvedi, Vishnu P. , Wiederhold, Nathan

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | December 31, 2015 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 662-665

10.1128/jcm.03019-15 Get It

ABSTRACT ME1111 is a novel small molecule antifungal agent under development for the topical treatment of onychomycosis. Standardization of the susceptibility testing method for this candidate antifungal is needed. Toward this end, 8 independent laboratories determined the interlaboratory reproducibility of ME1111 susceptibility testing. In addition, we subsequently identified 2 strains as quality control (QC) isolates for the method. In the reproducibility study, 5 blinded clinical strains each of Trichophyton rubrum , Trichophyton mentagrophytes , and Epidermophyton floccosum were tested, while the QC study tested 6 blinded T. rubrum or T. mentagrophytes ATCC strains. Testing was performed in frozen microtiter panels according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 methodology. In the reproducibility study, 9 of 15 clinical strains showed interlaboratory agreement of >90% at the 80% inhibition endpoint, with a range of agreement of 76.2% to 100%. In the QC study, 4 of the 6 ATCC strains showed interlaboratory agreement of >90%. ME1111 demonstrated excellent interlaboratory agreement when tested against dermatophytes. Based on this data, the CLSI Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Tests approved the susceptibility testing of ME1111 against dermatophytes according to M38-A2 methodology, which stipulates RPMI 1640 as the test medium, an inoculum size of 1 to 3 × 10 3 CFU/ml, and an incubation time and temperature of 96 h at 35°C. The MIC endpoint should be 80% inhibition compared with the growth control. T. rubrum ATCC MYA-4438 and T. mentagrophytes ATCC 28185 were selected as QC isolates, with an acceptable range of 0.12 to 1 μg/ml for the two strains.
In Vitro Susceptibilities of 217 Clinical Isolates of Zygomycetes to Conventional and New Antifungal Agents
Almyroudis, Nikolaos G. , Sutton, Deanna A., Fothergill, Annette W., Rinaldi, Michael G., Kusne, Shimon

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | April 24, 2007 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2587-2590

10.1128/aac.00452-07 Get It

ABSTRACT We evaluated the in vitro susceptibilities of 217 zygomycetes to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, and flucytosine. The significant in vitro activity of posaconazole against several species appears to support its reported clinical efficacy. Decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B was noted with Cunninghamella bertholletiae .
Multicenter Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Advanced Colorimetric Yeast Identification Card
Hata, D. Jane , Hall, Leslie, Fothergill, Annette W., Larone, Davise H., Wengenack, Nancy L.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | February 3, 2007 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1087-1092

10.1128/jcm.01754-06 Get It

ABSTRACT The performance of the new VITEK 2 Advanced Colorimetry yeast identification (YST) card for use with the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared to that of the API 20C AUX (API) system (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) in a multicenter evaluation. A total of 12 quality control, 64 challenge, and 623 clinical yeast isolates were used in the study. Comparisons of species identification, platform reliability, and substrate reproducibility were made between YST and API, with API considered the reference standard. Quality control testing to assess system and substrate reproducibility matched expected results ≥95% of the time. The YST card correctly identified 100% of the challenge strains, which covered the species range of the manufacturer's performance claims. Using clinical isolates, the YST card correctly identified 98.5%, with 1.0% of isolates incorrectly identified and 0.5% unidentified. Among clinical isolates, the YST card generated fewer low-discrimination results (18.9%) than did API (30.0%). The time to identification with YST was 18 h, compared to 48 to 72 h with API. The colorimetric YST card used with the VITEK 2 provides a highly automated, objective yeast identification method with excellent performance and reproducibility. We found this system useful for timely and accurate identification of significant yeast species in the clinical microbiology laboratory.